View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:36 pm Post subject: Stasia - Moskva 5 - Provia 100F |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
I was excited to get this roll back. I took this alongside some of the Helios 40 and Jupiter 9 pictures that were posted several weeks ago. I really wanted to try the lens at wide-open (f3.5) and close distances to see what kind of character it had. The first picture was the only one where lighting allowed that. It is the closet that the moskva can focus. The others were stopped down a bit. All were taken at 1/250th, handheld. Scanned on the v700.
On a side note: I was having a really rough day. I initially mounted my m39 mir-1 on the A850 but chose not to use that. I only had one m39 to m42 adapter with me so I had to switch it from lens to lens. But when trying to take that adapter off it sliced up my hand. Imagine really deep paper cuts. I gave up on the a850 for a little while, switching to the moskva. The moskva literally had blood all over it when I got it home. So truly, a serious part of myself went into these photos.
~Marc
Last edited by themoleman342 on Tue May 31, 2011 10:19 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Nice result ! Lot better than I got from my Moskva-5. I especially like first one. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Nice results.
You should photoshop some biceps on the 2nd from last image _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Really beautiful photos with an incredibly beautiful light.
This shows to anybody who think you can only take pictures with full sunlight, how wrong they are!
Was the last one posed, or a snapshot? I would have used that beautiful location for a more romantic portrait. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Quote: |
Was the last one posed, or a snapshot? I would have used that beautiful location for a more romantic portrait. |
The last is just a 'quick' snap. I probably should have taken another, more formal picture. We were on top of a stone look-out tower in Litchfield Connecticut. It was fairly early in the walk so I wanted to reserve some of the last photos for later on. Unfortunately for that set I exposed more for Anastasia's surroundings than for her, so there wasn't much detail to be pulled from her dark attire. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
themoleman342 wrote: |
Unfortunately for that set I exposed more for Anastasia's surroundings than for her, so there wasn't much detail to be pulled from her dark attire. |
I see no problem with the exposure. It was correct to expose for the ambient there. I oppose the idea that every detail must be made visible in any part of the photograph. Dark colours are supposed to be dark and you can't see much detail in the dark. Also psychologically this exposure fits well in the scene. I regard it as perfect.
My only objection is that what she's doing takes some of the poetry away. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Quote: |
I see no problem with the exposure. It was correct to expose for the ambient there. I oppose the idea that every detail must be made visible in any part of the photograph. Dark colours are supposed to be dark and you can't see much detail in the dark. Also psychologically this exposure fits well in the scene. I regard it as perfect.
My only objection is that what she's doing takes some of the poetry away. |
I agree with you 100%. Actually I was referring to the set taken after the tower. Those were exposed in a way that made her figure very dark. I don't mind her black shirt being dark but without acceptable exposure for the face, the image doesn't work. I can post them if you're interested. Just let me know.
The ones I've shown here are good exposure wise, I think. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mmelvis
Joined: 24 May 2010 Posts: 1326 Location: Florida,USA
Expire: 2015-05-09
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mmelvis wrote:
Your rough days produce some great work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
mmelvis wrote: |
Your rough days produce some great work. |
+1
I was going to say that these are damn GREAT images for a "rough" day! _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|