View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Fantastic work, thanks for sharing! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 1922 Location: Slovenija
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NikonD wrote:
Couldn't resist the tempetation and clicked "Sofort-Kaufen" on this lens, should be getting it next week... my wife's gonna kill me "yes honey no more lenses"
someone should take responsibility for my actions |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Thx for all feedback
Olivier wrote: |
What are the Exifs, please ? |
f/2; 1/200s; iso 100
One more:
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
I like this one more than the previous one. It's more natural to my eyes. Great portrait _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Yes, extremely nice portrait and looking professional, of course you Karabud know what do !
A very little criticism if you allow... I think that the skin was smoothed a bit too much compared to the hair.
Of course it looks great, but I think there should be a "balance" between the various elements: if the hair and browse are extremely detailed, like in this case, the skin must retain also some fine detail, for optical coherency.
Or, if you prefer the skin super smooth, you should apply a little "beauty blur" to the hair and browse as well, to make them stand out less and be a better match.
The way it is now, the hair overpowers and "dominates" the attention.
This, in my personal opinion of course! _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Carlsson
Joined: 26 Jul 2008 Posts: 793 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Carlsson wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Of course it looks great, but I think there should be a "balance" between the various elements: if the hair and browse are extremely detailed, like in this case, the skin must retain also some fine detail, for optical coherency. |
+1
I second that _________________
Contax III, Zeiss Ikon ZM, Contax AX, EOS 5D, R-D1
https://mariaeero.com/contax/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Thanks for the comments, surely they will use to make my pictures were better. I am still learning... Remember that it was pictures of my girlfriend, she always wants to have great skin
Another night shot, bw this time
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
NikonD
Joined: 29 Jul 2008 Posts: 1922 Location: Slovenija
|
Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2010 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NikonD wrote:
cant wait to get my sample of this superb lens
great shots! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
Does the rear optical elements move when focusing, or does it stay always in the same position? Could any owner of the 85/1.4 tell me? Thanks. _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
no-X wrote: |
Does the rear optical elements move when focusing, or does it stay always in the same position? Could any owner of the 85/1.4 tell me? Thanks. |
yes ! - karabud -- excellent pictures !!
It seems to be great piece of glass at reasonable price!
@ no-x - I have found ONLY this - I know you were asking for REAR ELEMENT - :
... " This lens is internal focus. The front optical element does not rotate and the body does not rack in/out when you focus. A very nice feature. We’ll come back to this shortly. .. "
full article here:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/46479-review-samyang-85mm-f1-4-aspherical-if.html
ONE of the reasons to have FIXED rear GLASS implemented is FLOATING ELEMENT.
Well, NOT ALWAYS - some lenses don't have fixed rear lens and do have floating element..
It's not possible to find the info about floating element of Samyang 85 f/1.4 -- if you find it -- the lens must have it then ...
I would say NO -- but this is question to karabud
tf _________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
no-X wrote: |
Does the rear optical elements move when focusing, or does it stay always in the same position? Could any owner of the 85/1.4 tell me? Thanks. |
Yes, it moves.
next one:
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Excellent shot, looks like a page from Vogue! _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5083 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
karabud wrote: |
Thx for all feedback
f/2; 1/200s; iso 100
One more:
|
Thank you Karabud.
The lighting must be very good to have those figures.
I like the previous page softer portrait very much too.
You clearly have this lens at your hand. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
Excellent pictures! What I understand is that this lens is very good for portrait shots, because of it's performance wide open. It does not seem to improve so much stopped down, so it is a specialized lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2010 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
eeyore_nl wrote: |
It does not seem to improve so much stopped down, so it is a specialized lens |
seems so, and safer to stay wide open because the aperture mechanism of the Samyang die after 1000 shots
http://www.flickr.com/groups/vivitar_85_14/discuss/72157622354242477/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Thx for feedback
next one
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Next one:
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bogolisk
Joined: 20 Dec 2009 Posts: 448
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bogolisk wrote:
Just discovered this thread...
looks like professional work. Outstanding. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bogolisk
Joined: 20 Dec 2009 Posts: 448
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2010 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bogolisk wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Yes, extremely nice portrait and looking professional, of course you Karabud know what do !
A very little criticism if you allow... I think that the skin was smoothed a bit too much compared to the hair.
Of course it looks great, but I think there should be a "balance" between the various elements: if the hair and browse are extremely detailed, like in this case, the skin must retain also some fine detail, for optical coherency.
Or, if you prefer the skin super smooth, you should apply a little "beauty blur" to the hair and browse as well, to make them stand out less and be a better match.
The way it is now, the hair overpowers and "dominates" the attention.
This, in my personal opinion of course! |
*bogolisk wrote down Orio's words of wisdom* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2010 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Thx bogolisk
One more
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Right side nikkor 50 1.4@1.6 K
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/
Last edited by karabud on Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:36 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
#2 portrait is so great! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tharos
Joined: 03 Nov 2009 Posts: 322 Location: Istanbul/TURKEY
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tharos wrote:
No2 and 4 great. I like the PP you made on No4 _________________ Camera : Yashica Electro 35 GS, Canon 450D, Konica C35 AF
28mm : Asahi Pentax SMC Takumar F3.5, Yashica ML F2.8
35mm : Distagon F2.8 (soon)
50mm : Carl Zeiss Jena Tessar F2,8 // aus Jena Pancolar F1.8 // SMC Tak F1.4 // Planar F1.7
55mm : Auto-Rikenon F1.8
58mm : Helios 44-3 F2
85mm : Jupiter 9 F2
135mm : Pentacon auto 6-blade F2.8 // Super Tak F3.5 // CZJ Sonnar F3.5 Zebra |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
I like #3! _________________ Fujifilm X-Pro2 / Fujifilm X-T1 / some Sonnar & Takumar lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Fri Apr 16, 2010 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Manual tilt:
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|