| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
hk300
Joined: 30 Oct 2008
Posts: 1041
Location: Hong Kong
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:17 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
hk300 wrote:
| Aykman wrote: |
Gratulations, Yalcin!
Today I bought approx. 60 issues of the german COLOR FOTO Magazine and 35 FOTOMAG issues from 1976 -1981. If I find some useful information about Rollei Lenses i will post it here.
cheers
Aykman |
That would be very interesting. Perhaps it would also make sense to make a new thread for the scans!
Thank you for the effort!
_________________
No longer member , please don't try to contact to him
Last edited by hk300 on Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yalcinaydin
Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 825
Location: Izmir, Turkey
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yalcinaydin wrote:
| hk300 wrote: |
That would be very interesting. Perhaps it would also make sense to do the scans in a new thread!
Thank you for the effort! |
Alex, publishing is not a good idea  Forming a private group and mailing is a better idea 
_________________
My name is "Yalcin", and exactly "Yalçın" and here you can find my MF samples:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/yalcinaydin/sets/
Right now switching back to AF because of work needs but I still love the MF lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hk300
Joined: 30 Oct 2008
Posts: 1041
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hk300 wrote:
| yalcinaydin wrote: |
| hk300 wrote: |
That would be very interesting. Perhaps it would also make sense to do the scans in a new thread!
Thank you for the effort! |
Alex, publishing is not a good idea Forming a private group and mailing is a better idea |
LOL
_________________
No longer member , please don't try to contact to him |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vintage_Photographer
Joined: 10 Jun 2024
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 9:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vintage_Photographer wrote:
Another 135/2.8 Rolleinar owner here.
A superb lens which excellent sharpness, contrast, colour and bokeh.
I'm very pleased with mine (used with a Rolleiflex SL35 and Fuji X-T4 and X-E2 via an adapter).
_________________
Current gear list:
Mamiya 645 TL Pro with 80mm and 110mm Sekor C, Rolleiflex SL35 with Rollei HFT 50mm/1.8, Rolleinar 135/2.8, 200/3.5, Pentacon 28/2.8 and Horizont 35/2.8, Minolta SRT100X, Rokkor 35-70mm f/3.5, Rokkor 100-300mm f/5.6.
Fuji X-E2 and X-T4 with Fuji 18-55 AF, 18-135 AF, TTArtisans 27/2.8 AF, 7.5/2 Fisheye, 35/1.4, 7Artisans 18/6.3, Samyang 12mm/2 AF, Tamron SP90 (on Nikon adapter), Ilford Sportsman, Zeiss IKon Contina II and Zeiss Ikoflex 1 TLR. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3225
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Congratulations. I have the Mamiya SX version of this lens. It is excellent at wider apertures.
I noticed however, that once stopped down to f/5.6 and smaller, the image loses contrast (centrally). Here is what I mean:
 comparisonbokeh by devoscasper, on Flickr
 COMPARISON by devoscasper, on Flickr
Curious if you have the same 'issue' with the Rolleinar? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vintage_Photographer
Joined: 10 Jun 2024
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vintage_Photographer wrote:
Mine is pretty much the opposite. Just did a quick test and wide open it's a little less contrasty than at 5.6 which is the same as 11 ithen at 22 it drops slightly..
Wasn't the best light to test properly so as soon as we get a decent day I'll try again.
_________________
Current gear list:
Mamiya 645 TL Pro with 80mm and 110mm Sekor C, Rolleiflex SL35 with Rollei HFT 50mm/1.8, Rolleinar 135/2.8, 200/3.5, Pentacon 28/2.8 and Horizont 35/2.8, Minolta SRT100X, Rokkor 35-70mm f/3.5, Rokkor 100-300mm f/5.6.
Fuji X-E2 and X-T4 with Fuji 18-55 AF, 18-135 AF, TTArtisans 27/2.8 AF, 7.5/2 Fisheye, 35/1.4, 7Artisans 18/6.3, Samyang 12mm/2 AF, Tamron SP90 (on Nikon adapter), Ilford Sportsman, Zeiss IKon Contina II and Zeiss Ikoflex 1 TLR. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 11061
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Which version is that f/2.5 Tak?
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3225
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 11:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| Vintage_Photographer wrote: |
Mine is pretty much the opposite. Just did a quick test and wide open it's a little less contrasty than at 5.6 which is the same as 11 ithen at 22 it drops slightly..
Wasn't the best light to test properly so as soon as we get a decent day I'll try again. |
Please do, maybe it’s just my sample. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010
Posts: 3225
Location: The Netherlands
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
| visualopsins wrote: |
| Which version is that f/2.5 Tak? |
That’s the v2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
