View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 6:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Another "must have lens". I really don't want to thank you for that, but what a fine series
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2011 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Well the word is out now on that lens. Just checked eBay and they have two listings, both BINs, with sky high prices. 55mm f/1.2 Nikkors and Canons are substantially cheaper. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Really cool series. You are lucky to have this lens!
Excellent write here about this lens:
http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/minolta-rokkor-58-to-canon-eos-conversion.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bogolisk
Joined: 20 Dec 2009 Posts: 448
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
bogolisk wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
Well the word is out now on that lens. Just checked eBay and they have two listings, both BINs, with sky high prices. . |
I blame karabud for this! he should have shot some ugly brick walls instead of those gorgeous pictures! _________________ When I try to be a photographer I manage to add an f to art. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
goombles
Joined: 08 Apr 2010 Posts: 136 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 1:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
goombles wrote:
Are every single one of these photos taken wide open? The lens resolves a lot of detail to my eye. Great lens in the hands of a great photographer _________________
Cameras: Canon 7D, Olympus OM-2n, Spotmatic SPII
M42: Sonnar 135/3.5, Flektogon 35/2.4, SMC Takumar 50/1.4, SMC Takumar 55/1.8, SMC Takumar 35/3.5
Tamron: SP 90/2.5 Macro |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 8:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
goombles wrote: |
Are every single one of these photos taken wide open? The lens resolves a lot of detail to my eye. Great lens in the hands of a great photographer |
Thx guys!
Yes, almost or all are wide open. This lens is very strange. Contrast and sharpness(sharpness at@1.2 is same as takumar or zeiss planar at@1.4 but at @1.4 rokk is better) isn`t very high when shooting wide open. But after adding it in pp it looks great and very sharp; none of my lenses are so susceptible to pp sharpening. Btw this lens is faster more than 1/2 stop than takumar.. and more than 1/3 than planar. Now i`m selling all my 50` and i keep Rokk and C/Y Planar, this 2 are very different and every special _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Hmmm . . . it could be that the sharpness is there, but just that the contrast is a bit soft, so it isn't as evident. And that during pp, by increasing contrast, the existing sharpness is revealed. I have lenses that are like this. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Thu Feb 10, 2011 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Few from today:
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
3 pics more
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shauttra
Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Posts: 778 Location: Latvia
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shauttra wrote:
that`s one great lens!!!!! _________________ Mto-1000, Tair-3, Auto Exaktar 135mm 2,8, Samyang 14mm 2.8,
Jupiter 37A, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135/3.5,
Helios-44, Mir-1, Revuenon 50/1.4,
Carl Zeiss Pancolar 50/1.8, Samyang 24/1.4, Auto Vivitar 35/2.8
www.radosi.lv
http://shauttra.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
shauttra wrote: |
that`s one great lens!!!!! |
Thx, yes it`s great lens, my favourite 40-60mm lens _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shauttra
Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Posts: 778 Location: Latvia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
shauttra wrote:
karabud wrote: |
shauttra wrote: |
that`s one great lens!!!!! |
Thx, yes it`s great lens, my favourite 40-60mm lens |
few years ago i had rokkor 50/1.2 but it wasn`t so good.. _________________ Mto-1000, Tair-3, Auto Exaktar 135mm 2,8, Samyang 14mm 2.8,
Jupiter 37A, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135/3.5,
Helios-44, Mir-1, Revuenon 50/1.4,
Carl Zeiss Pancolar 50/1.8, Samyang 24/1.4, Auto Vivitar 35/2.8
www.radosi.lv
http://shauttra.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
shauttra wrote: |
few years ago i had rokkor 50/1.2 but it wasn`t so good.. |
What was wrong with it? The usual story I hear is that it has bad bokeh but should be sharper/etc. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shauttra
Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Posts: 778 Location: Latvia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2011 12:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shauttra wrote:
Arkku wrote: |
shauttra wrote: |
few years ago i had rokkor 50/1.2 but it wasn`t so good.. |
What was wrong with it? The usual story I hear is that it has bad bokeh but should be sharper/etc. |
I used it only on film, bokeh was great and sharpness looks ok, i loved that lens.
Then i put it on DSLR with adapter(without correction lens) , and without possibility focus to infinity, and sharpness realy was bad.. all pictures from a DSLR I deleted..
Lens was not my own, I had borrowed it, but i will try to get it again
There is sample on film, looks great.
_________________ Mto-1000, Tair-3, Auto Exaktar 135mm 2,8, Samyang 14mm 2.8,
Jupiter 37A, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135/3.5,
Helios-44, Mir-1, Revuenon 50/1.4,
Carl Zeiss Pancolar 50/1.8, Samyang 24/1.4, Auto Vivitar 35/2.8
www.radosi.lv
http://shauttra.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Shauttra, I find that puzzling. I have some fast Canon FD lenses -- 85/1.2, 55/1.2, 50/1.4 -- and with my FD-EOS adapter, I can't focus very far, but the images look good at close distances. If I mount the correction lens in the adapter, then when I try to use the lenses wide open, yes, I get really bad flare.
Here's a yellow rose I shot with my 85mm f/1.2 SSC and FD-EOS adapter, lens wide open at 1.2:
If anything, photos with this lens and my DSLR are sharper than they are with my film cameras. Same is true with my FL 55/1.2 and my FD 50/1.4 SSC. Focusing with my DSLR is tricky though. It lies to me about what's in focus at fast f-stops. So I have to use Live View to make sure the subject is actually, really, and truly in focus.
The B&W photo you're showing looks very nice. If you have a chance to use the lens again, please post the photos next time before deleting them. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/
Last edited by cooltouch on Mon Feb 14, 2011 5:56 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shauttra
Joined: 17 Nov 2009 Posts: 778 Location: Latvia
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
shauttra wrote:
Ok, i will try this lens again, maybe i was young and stupid when i use it first time _________________ Mto-1000, Tair-3, Auto Exaktar 135mm 2,8, Samyang 14mm 2.8,
Jupiter 37A, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 135/3.5,
Helios-44, Mir-1, Revuenon 50/1.4,
Carl Zeiss Pancolar 50/1.8, Samyang 24/1.4, Auto Vivitar 35/2.8
www.radosi.lv
http://shauttra.blogspot.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gearsNcogs
Joined: 20 Oct 2010 Posts: 215
|
Posted: Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
gearsNcogs wrote:
karabud wrote: |
Few from today:
|
Your shots are fantastic! this one (above) in particular. this lens can yield some wonderful results! _________________ Stills: SLR: Asahi Pentax Spotmatic SP, DSLR: Canon EOS Rebel XTi, Canon EOS 7D
Cine: 16mm: Krasnogorsk-3 (M42 mount) 8mm: Revere Model 88 Super 8: Bell and Howell 1235 XL Filmosonic
MF Lenses: M42: Meteor 5-1 KMZ 17-69mm 1:1,9 (Cine Only), Asahi Super Takumar 50mm 1:1.4, Focal MC 28mm 1:2.8, Tele-Lentar 135mm 1:2.8, Helios-44 KMZ 58mm 1:2, Helios-44-2 KMZ 58mm 1:2 M39: Industar-26M 50mm 1:2.8 F: Nikon Nikkor 50mm 1:1.8 EF: Lensbaby Composer f2 w/Double Glass Optic, Rokinon 35mm 1:1.4 AS UMC, Rokinon 85mm T1.5 AS IF UMC
AF Lenses: EF-S: Canon EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 II, EF: Tamron AF 70-300mm 1:4-5.6 TELE-MACRO (1:2), Canon EF 50mm 1:1.8 II
Fixed-Focus Lenses: D: Elitar 6.5mm 1:1.9, Wollensak-Revere 13mm 1:2.5 Velostigmat |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Siswono
Joined: 06 Jan 2009 Posts: 98 Location: Hamburg - Germany
|
Posted: Wed Feb 23, 2011 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Siswono wrote:
woo ... sharp and nice bokeh |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 11:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
New pics:
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vovan
Joined: 16 Apr 2011 Posts: 43 Location: Russia
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 9:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Vovan wrote:
Great 3D look in last serie! Color, contrast and sharpness are perfect too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
Very nice, as I am used to see from this lens. I think you are bumping the contrast a bit too much though. The soft color rendering is one of the things that make this lens special.
You should also try the lens stopped down a bit to f/1.6-2.0 more (for variety) -- it transforms the bokeh a lot to become MUCH softer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
great Rokkor pics!
AhamB wrote: |
I think you are bumping the contrast a bit too much though |
with my last Rokkor series, I was frustrated to not be able to play with the contrast, slightest adjustment blocked the shadows and I preferred to let it
karabud contrast bump give lot of pop, it attract attention, I like it but I guess it could be boring after a while _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2011 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Few with strobes:
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 7:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
Few more
_________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kram
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1344 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kram wrote:
Fantastic! Popping colour! I want one! I want the lens too!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|