View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 11:27 pm Post subject: Reuse Rodinal ? |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Can I reuse the Rodinal developer I used for one roll?
If so, how does the developing times change? _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
kds315*
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16621 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
If I remember correctly (it is years ago) it cannot be used again. Just found that also on wikipedia (but in german) _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
thanks. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
kds315*
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16621 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
But there is RODINAL SPECIAL, that can be reused (page 7)
http://vietnam-photo.com/pdf/agfa_datenblatt.pdf
(sorry, found only the german one...)
There is a discussion about that here:
http://www.flickr.com/groups/rodinal/discuss/72157622340517487/ _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
Last edited by kds315* on Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:47 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Ah, so that is the difference with "special"! I always wondered.
Anyone has experience with special? _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
marty
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 767 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 1:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
marty wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Ah, so that is the difference with "special"! I always wondered.
Anyone has experience with special? |
As far as I know they are total different stuff, the only connection is in the name. More than that I do not know, since I've never used Rodinal Special. I would not reuse Rodinal since it's common to use it at high dilutions and thus when used once it's almost surely depleted.
Cheers, Marty. _________________ Canon FD
Bodies: AT-1, A-1, T-90
Lenses: nFD 20mm f2.8, 24 f2.8, 28 f2.8, 35 f2, FD 50 f1.8 S.C., 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8, 135 f2.8, 200 f4, 300 f4
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
F16SUNSHINE
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
I think I'm in the super minority in that I don't love Rodinal simply because it is one use.
T-max may cost more but I still find it a better value.
Rodinal is difficult to dispose of for me (all are). My house is on a septic system and I refuse to use the toilet to dump developer.
I know the label says ok but, no way! _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
In Italy we have so called "Ecological Stations", where you can take these liquids to for disposal. I have a can where I put exhausted liquids in, when it is full I take it to the eco station. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
martinsmith99
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Rodinal is not expensive, so I doubt I would consider reuse.
I'm on a septic system too. I have been pouring it down the drain with no ill efects......yet. I may store it and dispose elsewhere. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
kds315*
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16621 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Even it it could be poured down the drain, I would certainly NOT do it
and also rather collect it and bring it then to an ordered disposal station (we have those here to). Simply for eceological reasons. _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Scoo
![Level 1 Level 1](rating1.gif) Joined: 16 Jun 2009 Posts: 62 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scoo wrote:
I like one-shot developers in the summer because then the ambient room temperature often reaches 25°C or more and the tap water isn't as cold as it could be -> a lot of bottles cooling in the sink -> angry wife. A one-shot developer leaves me with just the fixer and stop bath which is more manageable.
Apart from that, I've see no problem with either kind. Will try a bottle of Fomadon LQN I recently got to try out (some say it's intended as a paper developer and not for film), the first one-shot I'll try apart from Rodinal and the old recipe Foma R09 (1+40 dilutions instead of Rodinal's 1+50 and so on). _________________ Has GAS and annoyed wife, has yet to meet flying frying pan or heavy lens though. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Helios
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 537 Location: East of France
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Helios wrote:
Single use , especially when the dilution ratio is 1/100 or 1/75 .... The developper energy is almost completely exhausted when you process a 36 exposures 35mm film .... Same thing with the Neofin "Blue". These developpers are excellent for very slow films , 25 to 50 iso. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
berraneck
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 972 Location: prague, czech republic
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
berraneck wrote:
Scoo wrote: |
Will try a bottle of Fomadon LQN I recently got to try out (some say it's intended as a paper developer and not for film) |
You mean Foma(the producer) says that?
Helios wrote: |
These developpers are excellent for very slow films , 25 to 50 iso. |
You mean rodinal? Have you tried Tri-X pushed to ISO1600 and developed in Rodinal 1+100? nice combination for reportage;) _________________ equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Scoo
![Level 1 Level 1](rating1.gif) Joined: 16 Jun 2009 Posts: 62 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scoo wrote:
berraneck wrote: |
Scoo wrote: |
Will try a bottle of Fomadon LQN I recently got to try out (some say it's intended as a paper developer and not for film) |
You mean Foma(the producer) says that? ![Smile](images/smiles/icon_smile.gif) |
Nope, just some speculation on another forum I think (maybe a bit silly to keep that rumour going by re-posting it here) Foma certainly labels it as a film developer, have not had time myself to use it yet but it will be the next one-shot developer I'll try out.
Ditto the high-dilution usage of Rodinal, it makes for a certain 'look'. _________________ Has GAS and annoyed wife, has yet to meet flying frying pan or heavy lens though. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
berraneck
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 972 Location: prague, czech republic
|
Posted: Thu Jan 28, 2010 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
berraneck wrote:
Scoo wrote: |
Nope, just some speculation on another forum I think (maybe a bit silly to keep that rumour going by re-posting it here) Foma certainly labels it as a film developer, have not had time myself to use it yet but it will be the next one-shot developer I'll try out. |
Yay, i switched Fomadon LQN(negative) and Fomatol(positive).. sorry, you´re right. _________________ equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
victorpatrick
Joined: 13 Jul 2023 Posts: 4 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2023 6:47 am Post subject: good |
|
|
victorpatrick wrote:
Yes, you can reuse Rodinal developer for multiple rolls of film. Rodinal is a highly concentrated developer that has a long shelf life and can be reused. Reusing developer can help you save costs and is a common practice among film photographers. Bitlife |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
philslizzy
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4743 Location: Cheshire, England
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2023 3:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
Ive tried it no.
1+50 rodinal used once, then immediately again - zero result. _________________ Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Doc Sharptail
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1145 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2023 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
It deteriorates pretty quickly when mixed, even at 1:25.
Once used 1:25 will almost develop matte papers~ if it's used immediately after the film. The murky, muddy results aren't really worth the effort.
To me, the original Rodinal system made a lot of sense on my highly varied schedules. No puttering around with replenishing powders etc, which ended up with a lot of good developer wasted in my experience.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
visualopsins
![Level 4 Level 4](rating4.gif) Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 10946 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2023 6:19 pm Post subject: Re: good |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
SPAM! See the url tags at the end?
Code: |
[quote="victorpatrick"]Yes, you can reuse Rodinal developer for multiple rolls of film. Rodinal is a highly concentrated developer that has a long shelf life and can be reused. Reusing developer can help you save costs and is a common practice among film photographers. [URL=https://bitlife2.com/][color=#FFFFFF][size=1]Bitlife[/size][/color][/URL][/quote] |
victorpatrick wrote: |
Yes, you can reuse Rodinal developer for multiple rolls of film. Rodinal is a highly concentrated developer that has a long shelf life and can be reused. Reusing developer can help you save costs and is a common practice among film photographers. (url deleted) |
_________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Doc Sharptail
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1145 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
berraneck wrote: |
You mean rodinal? Have you tried Tri-X pushed to ISO1600 and developed in Rodinal 1+100? nice combination for reportage;) |
Tri-X developed this way worked very well for me, especially with Ilford's multigrade matte/pearl papers.
Loved it with tri-x at ASA/ISO 320 and 1:50.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
titrisol70
![Level 1 Level 1](rating1.gif) Joined: 14 Dec 2021 Posts: 177 Location: State of Denial
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2023 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
titrisol70 wrote:
Yes, it was aimed at home-developing where only a few plates were developed at a time (1890s)
Very practical, highly concentrated, not too sensitive to temperature and fast acting.
It fell out of love in the 70s, when grain was underrated but came back in the 90s.
https://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/Rodinal/rodinal.html
Doc Sharptail wrote: |
To me, the original Rodinal system made a lot of sense on my highly varied schedules. No puttering around with replenishing powders etc, which ended up with a lot of good developer wasted in my experience.
-D.S. |
I made a mistake recently and used 1:10 instead of 1:25 for AGFA APX100, luckily I realized the mistake before the 1st minute and made a quick calc in my head. Negs are salvageable. _________________ Pentaxian and proud
Cameras: Spotmatic, I and F, Pentax ME, MESuper, ME-F, P30t, K-x, MZ-5, Mz-7 // K100D, Kx, K5IIs, K3-iii
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses:
Super Takumar 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/28, 1:1.8/55, 1:1.4/50 (7-element), 1:3.5/135
Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/55, 1:1.4/50, 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:4/200
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50
Lots of M, A, F, FA, DA series lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
Doc Sharptail
![Level 3 Level 3](rating3.gif) Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1145 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 17, 2023 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
titrisol70 wrote: |
I made a mistake recently and used 1:10 instead of 1:25 for AGFA APX100, luckily I realized the mistake before the 1st minute and made a quick calc in my head. Negs are salvageable. |
Good for you. I sometimes (not often) am that quick on my toes...
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
fotografiasol
![Level 1 Level 1](rating1.gif) Joined: 15 Dec 2013 Posts: 63 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Fri Aug 09, 2024 7:05 am Post subject: commercial lab and they reused Rodinal |
|
|
fotografiasol wrote:
In the 1980s I worked in a commercial lab and they reused Rodinal for a week. They used a liter already diluted to develop about 5 36 exp 135 films. They kept it in the refrigerator between work days. I was surprised since it was a single-use developer but everything was of sufficient commercial quality. Regards _________________ fotografiasol |
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/mflenses/images/spacer.gif) |
|