View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jito
Joined: 29 Nov 2011 Posts: 113
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:00 pm Post subject: Question about average 28mm lenses |
|
|
jito wrote:
I looked into manual focus lenses because I wanted to be able to take a bit better pictures without going bankrupt. I started by a zuiko 50mm and a jupiter 37a. I was very happy with the results so I continued bargain hunting and bought a few more lenses.
Even an old vivitar 85-205 zoom (not a series 1) is able to deliver solid results.
All was going fine until I needed a bit wider angle lenses than my mir1. I ordered two 28mm f2.8 from ebay. A yashica ML and a tokina, I didn't have very high expectations on the tokina but I was expecting much more from the yashica.
I haven't thoroughly tested their color rendition and contrast, but after using them quite a bit for family portraits I can't get tak sharp images. Both have similar resolution, somewhere in between my kit lens and my sharp mflenses. Not particularly bad, but on the border to not be worth to bother.
I've noticed that almost every 135mm lens is capable of very good results. The same appears to apply to 50mm lenses to some extent. My question is: is similar quality more difficult to achieve on 28mm lenses?
Or, in other words, is the average 28mm inferior than, say, the average 50mm? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Yes, in short.
However, the two you had should both be good ones, the Tokina is definitely sharp, the Yashica ML too, so I suspect you might have got unlucky and got bad copies, the Yashicas certainly are known to have some lemons, I think QC wasn't their strong point. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arninetyes
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 312 Location: SoCal
Expire: 2013-03-26
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arninetyes wrote:
My understanding is that yes, it is easier to make an excellent quality lens for an SLR if the focal length ranges from normal to short telephoto. I don't think anyone makes a bad 50mm or 85mm, but there are some dreadful wide angle lenses, and lots of terrible long telephotos.
Also, a brand name doesn't guarantee a good 28mm. You need to know the model. For example: a Nikkor 28/2.8 Ai is an unimpressive lens that is soft and doesn't do anything particularly well. It's replacement, the 28/2.8 Ais, is regarded as one of the best 28s around. There are plenty of people on this forum who can fill you in on which 28s might suit your needs, ranging from spare-no-expense (Zeiss, Leica, etc), to bargains that perform very nearly as well as the best.
Speaking of bargains, don't count Tokina out. My experience with Tokina lenses is that the better ones are very, very good--you just have to know the correct model before you buy.
There is one other factor as well: condition of the lens. I've had used wide-angle lenses that had enough haze and dust to prevent getting sharp images. Check that there is little haze and dust, as well as no fungus, in your lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
There are plenty of cheap (well when I bought them) good 28mm lenses if used stopped down (well on a film camera):-
I can recommended, from my copies, these lenses stopped down...may be good wide open but I've never tested them:-
FD& FDn Canon 28mm
Vivitar 28mm close focus
CZJ east German 28mm
Hexanon 28mm
Tamron 28mm
For a gamble and if bought for peanuts..my Makinon and Sigma are good others say they are crap.
Makinon 28mm
Yashica DSB 28mm
Sigma mini wide II 28mm
My 28mm lenses that are poor are:-
Osawa
Hanimex _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent.
Last edited by Excalibur on Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Super Takumar 28/3.5
Not the cheapest but good results are certain.
You can still get them on US ebay for $50 or a bit more. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Also the original Sigma Mini-wide is not bad at all. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arninetyes
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 312 Location: SoCal
Expire: 2013-03-26
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arninetyes wrote:
Hmm. I made an overly windy reply without giving recommendations, so here are the ones I've used:
Nikkor 28/3.5 Ai
Asahi Super Takumar 28/3.5
Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais
Nikkor 28/2 Ai (my favorite)
NOT recommended:
Nikkor 28/2.8 Ai
Nikon Series E 28/2.8 (same optics as the Ai, cheaper package) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andrew G.
Joined: 18 Jul 2010 Posts: 159 Location: Pennsylvania, USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andrew G. wrote:
Arninetyes wrote: |
NOT recommended:
Nikkor 28/2.8 Ai
Nikon Series E 28/2.8 (same optics as the Ai, cheaper package) |
This is incorrect. The Ai version used a 7 element/7 group optical design, whereas the Series E (and subsequent AF non-D version) used a different, cheaper optical design (5 elements/5 groups) which is probably the single worst 28mm that Nikon ever produced for the F mount. _________________
DSLR: Nikon D40x
SLR: Nikon N2000, Nikomat FTn
Glass:
Nikon:28mm f/2.8 Ai, 28mm f/2.8 Ai-S, 2.8cm f/3.5 F, 28mm f/3.5 Ai-S, 50mm f/1.8 Ai, (2) 50mm f/1.8 Series E, 55mm f/3.5 Micro K, 55mm f/3.5 Micro Ai, 100mm f/2.8 Series E, 105mm f/2.5 F, 105mm f/2.5 Ai, 105mm f/2.5 Ai-S, 200mm f/4 Ai-S, Process-Nikkor 260mm f/10, TC-200
Third-Party: Vivitar 28mm f/2.5 preset, Vivitar 28mm f/2.5 TX, Tamron 28mm f/2.8 Adapt-A-Matic (v. 1), Vivitar 35mm f/1.9 (Canon FD), Vivitar 35mm f/2.8 T4, Tamron 135mm f/2.8 Adapt-A-Matic, Vivitar 135mm f/3.5 preset, Vivitar 200mm f/3.5, Soligor 200mm f/3.5 T4, Star-D 500mm f/8 Mirror, Sigma 15-30mm f/3.5-4.5 AF, Tamron 28-70mm f/3.5-4.5 Adaptall-2 (44A), Hanimex 35-70mm f/2.8-3.8, [x2] Tamron SP 35-80mm f/2.8-3.8 Adaptall-2 (01A), Tokina AT-X 50-250mm f/4-5.6, Soligor 55-135mm f/3.5 T4, Vivitar 70-150mm f/3.8 (one-touch), Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 (one-touch), Soligor C/D 78-210mm f/3.5, Soligor C/D 100-300mm f/5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
In short what Ian said, although I would put accents differently.
The usefulness of 50mm lenses that you can buy cheaply is far greater than the usefulness of cheap 28mm lenses. Cheap 28mm means f2.8 and slower. Most kit zooms are F3.5-F4 at 28mm and close to their optimum performance. So you gain 1 stop maximum by going manual. With 50mm lenses you can get even f1.4 on the cheap if you are lucky and gain 3.5-4 stops. That's a huge difference.
That being said, there is a number of good 28mm lenses and a number of crap ones. In general 1st tier brands, such as Canon, Nikon, Minolta, Konica, Pentax, Olympus are from good to excellent and 2nd tier brands such as Vivitar, Hoya, Tokina could be good and could be crap.
I have a number of 28mm/f2.8 on sale on dpreview
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1056&message=39915755 The prices do reflect what I think about the lens.
Soligor - crap
Cosina - decent, but nothing special
Hoya HMC 28/f2.8 Wide-Auto - decent and interesting character
Vivitar (Komine) Auto Wide-Angle - very good
Canon FD and Minolta MD - excellent.
Canon FD is my favorite. Keep in mind though, that performance varies from copy to copy, so I wouldn't be surprised if someone claims that Canon is crap and his Soligor is the best lens he ever owned. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Other advantages to cheap 28mm manual lenses over kit lenses -
- focus control, which can be pretty random in many cases with AF, and most AF kit lenses are very hard to focus manually.
- zone focusing - hard to do with AF kit lens - this is the fastest "street photography" method. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Aanything
Joined: 27 Aug 2011 Posts: 2187 Location: Piacenza, Italy
Expire: 2014-05-30
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Aanything wrote:
My mamiya sekor sx 28/2.8 (found at a flea market, no expectations on it) is a good lens, so much that it soon became my standard walk-around lens (on aps-c). _________________ C&C and editing of my pics are always welcome
Samples from my lenses
My gear
My Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 1974
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Other advantages to cheap 28mm manual lenses over kit lenses -
- focus control, which can be pretty random in many cases with AF, and most AF kit lenses are very hard to focus manually.
- zone focusing - hard to do with AF kit lens - this is the fastest "street photography" method. |
+1. Also real aperture ring is very handy on small mirroless as they often lack direct controls. Still the point stands that MF 50mm lenses (and longer teles) offer more bang for the buck than wider lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Aanything wrote: |
My mamiya sekor sx 28/2.8 (found at a flea market, no expectations on it) is a good lens, so much that it soon became my standard walk-around lens (on aps-c). |
I just bought one of those for 30eu, I'm interested in it as it has 8 elements which suggests it should be rather good as most 28mm have 6, the wonderful Hexanon 3.5/28 has 7 so I hope the Mamiya is a rival to the Hexanon. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jito
Joined: 29 Nov 2011 Posts: 113
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jito wrote:
Thank you all for the feedback.
I think I got so-so copies. I wouldn't call them lime copies, but definitely they are incapable of delivering solid results. I guess for some people they are fine. Still better than my kit lens.
From the diversity of suggestions I take it that affordable 28mm are a gamble, far from a safe bet.
I think I may grab an om zuiko 28mm one of these days, but for the moment I'm a bit off-put.
How does the zuiko compares to a nikkor (assuming I pick the right model), which one is more likely to be a safe bet? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
jito wrote: |
Thank you all for the feedback.
I think I got so-so copies. I wouldn't call them lime copies, but definitely they are incapable of delivering solid results. I guess for some people they are fine. Still better than my kit lens.
From the diversity of suggestions I take it that affordable 28mm are a gamble, far from a safe bet.
I think I may grab an om zuiko 28mm one of these days, but for the moment I'm a bit off-put.
How does the zuiko compares to a nikkor (assuming I pick the right model), which one is more likely to be a safe bet? |
The slow model of Zuiko 28/3.5 is superb. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I can highly recommend the Pentacon 2.8/28 in PB mount, it is so cheap but really excellent. It can be used on EOS but needs a small adjustment for infinity. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arninetyes
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 312 Location: SoCal
Expire: 2013-03-26
|
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arninetyes wrote:
Andrew G. wrote: |
Arninetyes wrote: |
NOT recommended:
Nikkor 28/2.8 Ai
Nikon Series E 28/2.8 (same optics as the Ai, cheaper package) |
This is incorrect. The Ai version used a 7 element/7 group optical design, whereas the Series E (and subsequent AF non-D version) used a different, cheaper optical design (5 elements/5 groups) which is probably the single worst 28mm that Nikon ever produced for the F mount. |
You're quite correct. My original source was wrong.
I will say that I've used both, and both seemed about the same and very unimpressive. The E flared and ghosted more easily, but both were soft, especially in the edges and corners. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heartcat
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Posts: 371
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
heartcat wrote:
My RMC Tokina 28mm 2.8 in M42 mount is an excellent lens, perhaps my favourite! Sharp from wide open, close focusing, good contrast, and beautiful, natural colour straight out of the camera. Photos need little processing.
Perhaps you did get a bum copy. _________________ Canon 50D; CZJ Sonnar 135mm 3.5; SMC Takumar 55mm 1.8; Helios 44-2 58mm 2; Jupiter 37-A 135mm 3.5; Jupiter 11A 135mm 4; Pentacon 135mm 2.8; Nikkor-P 105mm 2.5;(Tokina) Vivitar 35mm 2.8; Tokina RMC 28mm 2.8; Vivitar 19mm 3.8; RMC Tokina 80-200mm 4.5; RMC Tokina 35-70mm 3.5; Panagor 90mm 2.8; Asahi Pentax extension tubes; 2xAuto Prinz teleconverter M42 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
I can highly recommend the Pentacon 2.8/28 in PB mount, it is so cheap but really excellent. It can be used on EOS but needs a small adjustment for infinity. |
+1 it's an awesome lens, Orestegon in disguise I'm regretting getting rid of my Praktica B series kit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
GrahamNR17 wrote: |
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
I can highly recommend the Pentacon 2.8/28 in PB mount, it is so cheap but really excellent. It can be used on EOS but needs a small adjustment for infinity. |
+1 it's an awesome lens, Orestegon in disguise I'm regretting getting rid of my Praktica B series kit |
It's a different design to the Orestegon, although I think they are pretty similar. The Orestegon has a colder colour rendering and softer corners, especially wide open, I sold my Orestegon and Lydith and kept both copies of the 28mm.
I have stunning copies of the PB 1.8/50 and 2.8/28, better than any of the several M42 Meyer/Pentacons I've owned. Sadly my copy of the PB 2.8/135 is a bit of a dog but I just bought another copy for a tenner that I hope will be great like the 28 & 50 I have. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7788 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I've had very good results from the Pentacon 30 3.5, it does colours superbly. But my recommendation would be the Vivitar 28 2.8 Close Focus from Komine ( serial numbers 28------- ) There are many versions of the Vivitar 28, some way better than others, have a look at the THE GREAT VIVITAR 28MM BESTIARY - http://photografica.robinparmar.com/vivitar.html - it's interesting reading. Don't discount the Vivitar, it's my auto pilot lens out of 8 lenses in that range. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
I had M42 Pentacon 30/3.5 and M42 Tokina RMC 28/2.8 which were both usable an cheap.
Here are some sample pics with the Pentacon 30/3.5 made by me (mostly under very bad light conditions though) http://forum.mflenses.com/little-test-of-m42-pentacon-30mm-f3-5-on-nex-t46882,highlight,%2Bpentacon.html
It has good natural colors and is also fairly sharp and fairly contrasty wide open
The Tokina RMC 28/2.8 is also good but I never made a direct comparision to the Pentacon
The Pentacon 29/2.8 plays in the same league (but is a little softer wide open as far as I know).
In the meanwhile I got an (expensive) Carl Zeiss Biogon T* 28/2.8 and now they are all looking like crap for me
(The Biogon is somewhat better in all attributes and also rules out even most modern lenses)
EDIT
I also had a M42 Revue ~30/2.8 Macro (a plastic casing lens made by Enna München and not a real macro - only good close up function) which good (at least sharp in center but it had a little low contrast) and a M42 Auto Revuenon 35/2.8 which was crap (maybe a bad copy though). _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3704 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Mar 20, 2012 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
+1 for Prakticar.
_________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ivoverboon
Joined: 07 Mar 2012 Posts: 43 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ivoverboon wrote:
I have the Vivitar 2.8/28 MC wide angle. It comes from Komine. It is cheap and fantastic.
greetz.....Ivo
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Arkku
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1416 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Arkku wrote:
Ivoverboon wrote: |
I have the Vivitar 2.8/28 MC wide angle. It comes from Komine. It is cheap and fantastic. |
Yes, the Komine-made Vivitar 28mm f/2.8 is optically superb, I recommend it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|