| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
 Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:03 am Post subject: |
 |
|
fotkino wrote:
Test photos + 100% center/near the center crops
Canon 5D mkII
Av
f:1.5
Сloudy
Sharpness: +3
Contrast: 0
WB: auto
Exposure correction: the first frame 0, the remaining -1
RAW to Jpeg: Canon DPP
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
[url=http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/201210/big_4233__MG_9923_Origin_1.jpg]
 [/url]
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011
Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
Interesting. Thanks for sharing.
Not so sharp at f1.5.
While you are on it, can you post some photos with different distances? 3m, 5m, 6m, 7m, 20m, infinity?
_________________
La migliore cura di LBA � imparare una nuova lingua. Le meilleur rem�de de LBA est d'apprendre une nouvelle langue. La mejor cura del LBA es aprender una nueva lengua. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
fotkino wrote:
| hoanpham wrote: |
Interesting. Thanks for sharing.
Not so sharp at f1.5.
While you are on it, can you post some photos with different distances? 3m, 5m, 6m, 7m, 20m, infinity? |
Rainy, I hope tomorrow the weather will be better.
Plan to test both my lens in the same conditions.
#1 #2 - approx 1 meter
#3 - approx 2 meters
#4 #5 approx 1,5
#6 - approx 2 meters
#7 #9 approx 1,5 meters
#8 - at min distance - 38cm
This lens has a very tight focus ring.
Approaching the minimum focusing distance, the lens has to get out of the adapter, had to hold on tight.
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009
Posts: 1632
Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
fotkino, thank you for your testing and your translations and such!
Are this test photos without a lens shade / hood?
I suppose with a long hood or probably hand contrast would be higher?
I have the old chrome Helios 40, will not buy the new one. But I am very fascinated about an old well known lens manufacturer that seem to want to "restart" its production. Even more than this Helios 40 lens I am interested what all will come...
Have seen nice things on theri Photokina booth.
_________________
Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
| fotkino wrote: |
This lens has a very tight focus ring.
Approaching the minimum focusing distance, the lens has to get out of the adapter, had to hold on tight. |
+1. Yes, it's what frequently happened when I use my old Helios 40-2.
I come up with a solution, to pinch the lens barrel with my thumb & forefinger and the do the focusing using my middle finger.
Fotkino, could you do some shots for flare test? With the sun is just outside the frame.
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
fotkino wrote:
| ZoneV wrote: |
fotkino, thank you for your testing and your translations and such!
Are this test photos without a lens shade / hood?
I suppose with a long hood or probably hand contrast would be higher?
|
You're right, photo taken without the lens hood. With the hood is likely to be exactly as you say.
I looked that's an option
http://samyang.ru/aksessuary/blendy/blenda_dlya_obektiva_samyang_500_8_preset/
but it may be necessary to cut it short 
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
fotkino wrote:
[quote="nixland"]
| fotkino wrote: |
Fotkino, could you do some shots for flare test? With the sun is just outside the frame. |
OK. I already typed a list of tests that need to be done
Now the sun behind the clouds, as soon as possible - I'll do it.
- Test with different distances
- Flare test
...what else?
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
fotkino wrote:
[quote="nixland"]
| fotkino wrote: |
Fotkino, could you do some shots for flare test? With the sun is just outside the frame. |
Hooray! The sun!
I caught the sunbeams, in the picture the best results that I got. When the sun is not in line of sight of the lens - is the expected loss of contrast. When the sun is in the frame - depending on the angle. From a small flare up of the rainbow
If we compare with a silver version of the lens - excellent protected from flare I think.
(Full frame and some сrops to see the chromatic aberration)
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
But the flare has its charm And in this version of the lens that I will miss...
This photo was taken specifically with flare on the old silver Helios 40 with violet-blue coating:
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
The performance and flare look identical to my experience with copies from the 70s and 80s, therefore I suspect that
the coating has not been improved.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Misha_M
Joined: 08 Oct 2012
Posts: 178
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Misha_M wrote:
Looks great!
Thank you for doing the tests...
But now I would like to ask for another set of tests, more "purpose wise" 
Can you please shoot some portraits with the lens, maybe over the weekend?
Also, can you do it with comparison to the old chrome \ silver \ white version that you own, please?
That would be very interesting!
_________________
Tair 11 133 f/2.8 1958
Jupiter 9 85 f/2 1959
Helios 44M 58 f/2 1978
Helios 44-2 58 f/2 1977
Helios 44 (13 blades) 1959
Helios 77M4 50 f/1.8
Zenitar-M 50 f/1.7 1986
Industar-61 L\Z 50 f/2.8
Helios 40-2, 85 f/1.5 1974 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fotkino wrote:
| Orio wrote: |
The performance and flare look identical to my experience with copies from the 70s and 80s, therefore I suspect that
the coating has not been improved. |
I have a good news for you
(translation - Google)
1. http://zenit-foto.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=610&Itemid=104
"JSC "Krasnogorsk Plant. SA Zvereva" invites legal persons and individual entrepreneurs to participate in an open one stage tender without preliminary qualification for the right to:
- Agreement for the supply of five axis machining center with a set of related activities for the needs of the JSC "Krasnogorsk Plant. SA Zvereva "(Lot number 14)."
2. http://zenit-foto.ru/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=611&Itemid=104
"JSC "Krasnogorsk Plant. SA Zvereva" invites legal persons and individual entrepreneurs to participate in an open one stage tender without preliminary qualification for the right to:
- Agreement for the supply of high-precision turning center (turning machine) with a set of related activities for the needs of the Open JSC "Krasnogorsk Plant. SA Zvereva "(Lot number 12).
Perhaps we'll soon see something interesting from KMZ
A breakthrough in technology and complete victory over samyang
Or ... new T-34 tank with a thick lens ... who knows!?
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fotkino
Joined: 04 May 2011
Posts: 111
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fotkino wrote:
| Misha_M wrote: |
Can you please shoot some portraits with the lens, maybe over the weekend?
Also, can you do it with comparison to the old chrome \ silver \ white version that you own, please?
That would be very interesting! |
OK, I'll try
_________________
_____________________________________
Sorry for my English |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
[quote="fotkino"]
| nixland wrote: |
| fotkino wrote: |
Fotkino, could you do some shots for flare test? With the sun is just outside the frame. |
Hooray! The sun!
I caught the sunbeams, in the picture the best results that I got. When the sun is not in line of sight of the lens - is the expected loss of contrast. When the sun is in the frame - depending on the angle. From a small flare up of the rainbow
If we compare with a silver version of the lens - excellent protected from flare I think.
|
Thank you for doing the test & sharing the test photos. I really appreciate it.
Based on your test photos, I think it's like what Orio said that the coating is the same with the old one.
Below is my recent shot with my 40-2.
Top : against evening sun with 3rd party metal hood attached
Bottom : under the tent, sun from right side .... when there's no strong light from the front, the 40-2 rocks!
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mir
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Posts: 982
Location: Montreal, Canada
Expire: 2017-09-30
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 4:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mir wrote:
Just came across this listing on ebay...
_________________
"Obsta principiis, finem respice"
"There is a fine line between hobby and mental illness"
MISC: Tamron SP 35-80 (01A), Auto Chinon Tomioka 1.4/55, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90, Tamron SP 5,6/300 (54B)
ZEISS: WG Distagon 2.8/25, WG Distagon 2.8/35 HFT, WG Planar HFT 1.4/50, Ultron 1.8/50, WG Sonnar 2.8/85, WG Sonnar HFT 2.8/135
VOIGTLÄNDER : Ultron Aspherical 1.8/21, Ultron 2/28, Nokton Aspherical 1.2/35, Nokton Classic 1.4/40, Nokton 1.2/50, Nokton Aspherical 1.5/50, Color-Heliar 2.5/75
MINOLTA: MD 3.5/35-70 Macro, MD 1.2/50, MC Rokkor-X 1.2/58, MD Macro 3.5/50
LEITZ: SUMMICRON-R 2/35 (II), SUMMICRON-R 2/50 (II), TELE ELMARIT-M 2,8/90 (Thin)
CANON RF: 2.8/28, 2/35, 1.2/50, 1.4/50, Serenar 1.8/50, 2/85, 2/100, 3.5/100
LTM : YASHICA YASHINON 1.8/5cm, FUJINON L 2/5cm, CHIYODA KOGAKU SUPER ROKKOR 1.8/5cm, CHIYOKO SUPER ROKKOR C 2/5cm, TOKYO KOGAKU Topcor-S 2/5cm, Nippon Kogaku NIKKOR-H.C 2/5cm, KMZ Jupiter-8 2/5cm
DKL : VOIGTLÄNDER SKOPAREX 3,4/35, SEPTON 2/50, DYNAREX 3,4/90, SUPER-DYNAREX 4/135, Scheiner-Kreuznach Retina-Xenon 1,9/50
And a small Minolta AF set: 2.8/20, 1.4/35, 1.4/50, 2/100, 4.5/100-200
@we3fotography
@7plus_pictures
@_whats.that.car_ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pinkerator
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 16
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 6:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pinkerator wrote:
| Mir wrote: |
| Just came across this listing on ebay... |
Interesting! Let's wait for the final price I think finally 600$ will look much interesting than it
Anyway, I got no new lenses right now 
_________________
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1264921.html
Helios 40-2 topic on 'Market' |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy
Joined: 18 Dec 2010
Posts: 1258
Location: Down East, Canada, eh?
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 12:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy wrote:
Another Ebay listing from rus_camera, BIN for US $1,200!
Click here to see on Ebay
Here's what he says in the listing. Obviously I have no idea if it's true but I'll post it for your education/amusement -
| Quote: |
I asked my friend-photographer to compare new and old Helios.
In new Helios there is no tripod mount ring.
The focusing ring differs. Other coating of lenses.
In the pictures we didn't notice essential differences.
Probably, it occurred because factory standards at a new and old lens same.
There is informal information. Ostensibly the first party of lenses was made from old lenses , made in the eighties.
On old lenses put a new coating. If it is the truth, then it is clear why in sale less than 50 pieces of lenses arrived. The stock of old lenses probably ended. There is information that the new party will be already from new lenses. And factory price will be above. Prime cost price of a new lens will be higher than $600. And what will be selling price knows nobody. Lenses from the first party already became a big rarity. We managed to buy three lenses at the price of several times above the declared. You could see that they aren't present on sale. The plant stopped productions of them . Otherwise all ebay would be filled up new Helios.
|
EDIT - if this info is true then congratulations to fotkino, your new Helios is a rare and valuable item.  
_________________
I welcome C&C, editing my pics and reposting them on the forum is fine.
NEX-F3
~~~~~~~~~
CZJ Sonnar 135/4, Biotar 58/2, Pancolar 50/2, Tessar 50/2.8, Flek 35/2.8, Flek 25/4
Super Takumar 135/2.5, 135/3.5, 100/4 bellows, 50/1.4, 28/3.5
Helios 58/2, 3M-5A 500/8, Mir 20M
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 - - - - - - - - Nikkor 200/4
Rikenon 28/2.8 - - - - - - - - Zeiss 50/1.7 Planar
PB 50/2.4, 135/2.8
Yashica 50/1.9, 28/2.8, 135/2.8
Hexanon 28/3.5, 50/1.4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Misha_M
Joined: 08 Oct 2012
Posts: 178
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2012 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Misha_M wrote:
LOL!
And just think that 2 weeks ago you could buy that in Moscow for 200$ (the website even said that in the shop they had 20% off all prices as a sale act due to the arrival of the new lenses...) .
It would be really funny to see people buying the "new" ones 2-4 times (or even more!) the price than what you will have to pay for an old, chrome, Helios-40 (M39), even with red "n" on it.
The 400$-500$ they are asking for the "silver \ white" versions doesn't sound that out there now, eh?
Anyway, I think that when the really new (although still using 1989 standards...) with the modern canon \ nikon mounts will hit the market, prices fro the M42 versions will drop... I hope, at least, that they do; would really like to own an early "0\00\000" chrome Helios-40!
_________________
Tair 11 133 f/2.8 1958
Jupiter 9 85 f/2 1959
Helios 44M 58 f/2 1978
Helios 44-2 58 f/2 1977
Helios 44 (13 blades) 1959
Helios 77M4 50 f/1.8
Zenitar-M 50 f/1.7 1986
Industar-61 L\Z 50 f/2.8
Helios 40-2, 85 f/1.5 1974 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pinkerator
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 16
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pinkerator wrote:
| Misha_M wrote: |
(the website even said that in the shop they had 20% off all prices as a sale act due to the arrival of the new lenses...) .
|
That's not correct. They wrote 20% off all prices on site, but in real life there was no discount on Helios 40-2.
_________________
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1264921.html
Helios 40-2 topic on 'Market' |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 5:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
$1200 !!!?? .... Mamma mia ...
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sirrith
Joined: 17 Sep 2010
Posts: 215
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sirrith wrote:
Methinks rus_camera is price gouging before the lens becomes more widely available, but hey, I could be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ulli65
Joined: 21 Oct 2012
Posts: 6
Location: Nederland
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 4:56 pm Post subject: Helios 40-2 |
|
|
ulli65 wrote:
I am very interested in getting a 40-2 again, as i sold mine because i had such a hard time focussing it on my Olympus E-3. Now i am migrated to the mFT system which is much more convenient for MF lenses.
Hope to get one for the official price (I remember i bought mine in 2008 for 125 euros and sold it again for 150 euros......)!
I hope can get help via this forum, to order one directly from Moscow
kind regards,
Ulli |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Welcome Uli!
Be careful with order throw this forum , no guarantee finally you will receive it.
I had this lens multiply times I always sold not worth more than 300 USD , if I willing to spend higher amount my choice will be Pancolar 80, Planar 85mm , Samyang 85mm etc
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ulli65
Joined: 21 Oct 2012
Posts: 6
Location: Nederland
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ulli65 wrote:
Thx Attila,
I will keep that in mind.
it's just that I like the swirly/crazy/funky bokeh of this lens alot.
200 euros for a new one would be more in line with my budget |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2012 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| ulli65 wrote: |
Thx Attila,
I will keep that in mind.
it's just that I like the swirly/crazy/funky bokeh of this lens alot.
200 euros for a new one would be more in line with my budget |
200 EUR will fit to any of us, indeed.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pinkerator
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 16
Location: Russia, Moscow
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 4:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pinkerator wrote:
Today new lenses arrived in the KMZ shop, but they have a new cost now. 12600 in roubles and even with that cost all lenses was sold in first day.
_________________
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1264921.html
Helios 40-2 topic on 'Market' |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
