View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 2:22 pm Post subject: Nokton 1.1/50 anyone? |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Any hands-on experience with this rangefinder lens?
I saw the pictures in Flickr and they look good. But I'd like to hear a personal experience report.
The price seems very good for such a fast lens. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Although I've not spent much time with it. I find it too large for practical use.
A friend in Vancuver has one and loves it on his M8.
To me a ZM Sonnar c 1.5/50 is more appealing.
Much more compact and nicer oof rendering and, only a bit slower.
Same price range also.
The 1.2/35 nokton although the same size is far more interesting and useful.
(opinions) _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
Although I've not spent much time with it. I find it too large for practical use.
A friend in Vancuver has one and loves it on his M8.
To me a ZM Sonnar c 1.5/50 is more appealing.
Much more compact and nicer oof rendering and, only a bit slower.
Same price range also.
The 1.2/35 nokton although the same size is far more interesting and useful.
(opinions) |
yeah
Only problem, I don't like much the rendering of the 1.2/35 Nokton from what I could see on Flickr
Of course, I admit flickr images can not always tell the truth (a lot depends on the quality of the photographers). _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009 Posts: 385 Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
Posted: Mon May 10, 2010 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
yes orio ... is a good lens...
for one thing we are on the same idea!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/17758/4587719465/in/pool-nokton50f11
_________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
By the way, Andy, I agree about the nicer OOF of the C Sonnar.
I am still waiting for my Amedeo adapter for Contax RF lenses, to mount the Opton on the M9 !
However, I must say that the Nokton 1.1 is not only slightly faster, it's more than 1,5 stops faster (f1,1 is one and half stop faster of a f1.4).
In the night, 1.5 stops really makes the difference between a photo made and no photo... _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16657 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Well, if I would look for experiences with a rangefinder lens, I would consult
www.rangefinderforum.com, there is lots about it to find...(Andy is also a member there) _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Neare
Joined: 09 Sep 2009 Posts: 43 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Neare wrote:
For the price it's a damn good lens. Mine handled well, I don't mind heavy things even on the RF so weight didn't bother me.
It's sharp even wide open, basically it preformed as an all rounder for me, from daylight to night time shooting.
Rendering wise... well its 'Bokeh' isn't the most pleasant (you'd be better off with a ZM Sonnar if you're after Bokeh)
Nonetheless it's an extremely good lens (more so if you follow the 1 Body, 1 Lens idea). That said I've only had experience with it on film. _________________ Photos |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue May 11, 2010 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Quote: |
However, I must say that the Nokton 1.1 is not only slightly faster, it's more than 1,5 stops faster (f1,1 is one and half stop faster of a f1.4).
In the night, 1.5 stops really makes the difference between a photo made and no photo... |
I don't think so. Because 1.4/√2 = 1 (even a little bit less), so 1.1 is less than a full stop faster than 1.4. May be it can be important anyhow, but don't exaggerate the advantage. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|