View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
It's a very capable lens I have the slightly newer, but way more beat up S-C version kindly passed to me by member Rawhead...not sure it's coated at all anymore to be honest
|
The OP has the NIKKOR-S which is single coated. The NIKKOR-S・C version is multicoated. Even if you think that you've lost the coating on the front of the front element (and maybe on the back of the back element) there are eight internal surfaces. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
sichko wrote: |
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
It's a very capable lens I have the slightly newer, but way more beat up S-C version kindly passed to me by member Rawhead...not sure it's coated at all anymore to be honest
|
The OP has the NIKKOR-S which is single coated. The NIKKOR-S・C version is multicoated. Even if you think that you've lost the coating on the front of the front element (and maybe on the back of the back element) there are eight internal surfaces. |
Lifted from the MIR website:
By the end of 1959 this mysterious lens was introduced. Some people believe that this lens, having 7 elements in 5 groups, wasn't produced by Nikon itself. This lens had a relatively short life. In less than 2 years it disappeared from the market. Total production is a mere 39,000 lenses, though it has variations, mainly in its markings on the distance scale. There are lenses with a scale in metres or in inches ......... or in both metres and inches! In March 1962 its ‘sister’ came on the market. A version of this lens has a "Patent Pending" inscribed on the metal lens barrel.
7 elements in 5 groups so not a Sonnar design. Sonnars will usually be medium tele lenses on 35mm SLRs due to the register distance needed. RF lenses of course can be shorter FLs. _________________ Casual attendance these days
Last edited by martinsmith99 on Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:21 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FluffPuppy
Joined: 11 Dec 2011 Posts: 365
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FluffPuppy wrote:
Lens coatings don't fall off or evaporate. It's probably just fine! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
FluffPuppy wrote: |
Lens coatings don't fall off or evaporate. It's probably just fine! |
But they can be removed with over-zealous cleaning techniques. Graham mentioned his had a hard life. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
FluffPuppy wrote: |
Lens coatings don't fall off or evaporate. It's probably just fine! |
But they can be removed with over-zealous cleaning techniques. Graham mentioned his had a hard life. |
The rear element has more scratches than a dog with fleas, but I guess as Sichko pointed out, the other elements are probably coated too _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g
Last edited by ManualFocus-G on Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:31 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FluffPuppy
Joined: 11 Dec 2011 Posts: 365
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FluffPuppy wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
martinsmith99 wrote: |
FluffPuppy wrote: |
Lens coatings don't fall off or evaporate. It's probably just fine! |
But they can be removed with over-zealous cleaning techniques. Graham mentioned his had a hard life. |
The rear element has more scratches than a dog with fleas, but I guess as Sickho pointed out, the other elements are probably coated too |
The outer surfaces of front and rear elements of lenses are usually given extra-hard coatings. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
FluffPuppy wrote: |
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
martinsmith99 wrote: |
FluffPuppy wrote: |
Lens coatings don't fall off or evaporate. It's probably just fine! |
But they can be removed with over-zealous cleaning techniques. Graham mentioned his had a hard life. |
The rear element has more scratches than a dog with fleas, but I guess as Sickho pointed out, the other elements are probably coated too |
The outer surfaces of front and rear elements of lenses are usually given extra-hard coatings. |
I'm sure, but that doesn't help the patches with no coating left at all
Anyway, we're way off topic, if anyone has anything to add about the single coated version, feel free to post the info here. _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FluffPuppy
Joined: 11 Dec 2011 Posts: 365
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FluffPuppy wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
FluffPuppy wrote: |
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
martinsmith99 wrote: |
FluffPuppy wrote: |
Lens coatings don't fall off or evaporate. It's probably just fine! |
But they can be removed with over-zealous cleaning techniques. Graham mentioned his had a hard life. |
The rear element has more scratches than a dog with fleas, but I guess as Sickho pointed out, the other elements are probably coated too |
The outer surfaces of front and rear elements of lenses are usually given extra-hard coatings. |
I'm sure, but that doesn't help the patches with no coating left at all
Anyway, we're way off topic, if anyone has anything to add about the single coated version, feel free to post the info here. |
Well the best info about it is in tale 44 on the Nikon site. It is very informative.
http://imaging.nikon.com/history/nikkor/44/index.htm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
sichko wrote: |
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
It's a very capable lens I have the slightly newer, but way more beat up S-C version kindly passed to me by member Rawhead...not sure it's coated at all anymore to be honest
|
The OP has the NIKKOR-S which is single coated. The NIKKOR-S・C version is multicoated. Even if you think that you've lost the coating on the front of the front element (and maybe on the back of the back element) there are eight internal surfaces. |
Lifted from the MIR website:
By the end of 1959 this mysterious lens was introduced. Some people believe that this lens, having 7 elements in 5 groups, wasn't produced by Nikon itself. This lens had a relatively short life. In less than 2 years it disappeared from the market. Total production is a mere 39,000 lenses, though it has variations, mainly in its markings on the distance scale. There are lenses with a scale in metres or in inches ......... or in both metres and inches! In March 1962 its ‘sister’ came on the market. A version of this lens has a "Patent Pending" inscribed on the metal lens barrel. |
This relates to the Nikkor-S Auto 1:1.4 f=5.8cm. The OP's lens is a 50 mm lens.
Quote: |
7 elements in 5 groups so not a Sonnar design. Sonnars will usually be medium tele lenses on 35mm SLRs due to the register distance needed. RF lenses of course can be shorter FLs. |
Klaus asked if the OP's lens was a Sonnar. I gave him a link to the Nikon site which describes it as a 7/5 Gauss. The same site also describes a 6/3 Sonnar - which is a rangefinder lens. The link was given in my first post in this thread. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
FluffPuppy
Joined: 11 Dec 2011 Posts: 365
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
FluffPuppy wrote:
sichko wrote: |
martinsmith99 wrote: |
sichko wrote: |
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
It's a very capable lens I have the slightly newer, but way more beat up S-C version kindly passed to me by member Rawhead...not sure it's coated at all anymore to be honest
|
The OP has the NIKKOR-S which is single coated. The NIKKOR-S・C version is multicoated. Even if you think that you've lost the coating on the front of the front element (and maybe on the back of the back element) there are eight internal surfaces. |
Lifted from the MIR website:
By the end of 1959 this mysterious lens was introduced. Some people believe that this lens, having 7 elements in 5 groups, wasn't produced by Nikon itself. This lens had a relatively short life. In less than 2 years it disappeared from the market. Total production is a mere 39,000 lenses, though it has variations, mainly in its markings on the distance scale. There are lenses with a scale in metres or in inches ......... or in both metres and inches! In March 1962 its ‘sister’ came on the market. A version of this lens has a "Patent Pending" inscribed on the metal lens barrel. |
This relates to the Nikkor-S Auto 1:1.4 f=5.8cm. The OP's lens is a 50 mm lens.
Quote: |
7 elements in 5 groups so not a Sonnar design. Sonnars will usually be medium tele lenses on 35mm SLRs due to the register distance needed. RF lenses of course can be shorter FLs. |
Klaus asked if the OP's lens was a Sonnar. I gave him a link to the Nikon site which describes it as a 7/5 Gauss. The same site also describes a 6/3 Sonnar - which is a rangefinder lens. The link was given in my first post in this thread. |
I agree. Sonnars today (for SLRs) are tele designs having 4 or 5 elements. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kopi234
Joined: 25 Jul 2012 Posts: 103 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
kopi234 wrote:
hi joy division, nice shot you made!
I have this lens, This lens is pretty good I think, acceptable sharpness at wide open.
here some pictures that I took using this lens:
bokeh@F1.4, d60 straight from camera
d60, F/1.4, 1/10s, tripod, straight from camera
d60, F/5.6, 1/30s, handheld.
[/img] _________________ secangkir kopi, sebatang rokok |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011 Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 10:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
Bokeh is nice, and the last photo of motorbike is awesome.
How far did he make it? _________________ La migliore cura di LBA � imparare una nuova lingua. Le meilleur rem�de de LBA est d'apprendre une nouvelle langue. La mejor cura del LBA es aprender una nueva lengua. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
Wasn't that the one with a Sonnar lens design? |
FluffPuppy wrote: |
..........
Klaus asked if the OP's lens was a Sonnar. I gave him a link to the Nikon site which describes it as a 7/5 Gauss. The same site also describes a 6/3 Sonnar - which is a rangefinder lens. |
The Nikkor Nippon Koagku SC f1.4 ( and also f2 HC ) rangefinder lenses are Sonnars. ( as far as I know Takumar f2/58 still is the only known Sonnar normal SLR lens ) The f1.4 was optimized and is famed for it's close up, wide open abilities and therefore is traded for a premium ( the reason why I haven't yet bought any though I have been looking for one since a while ) see: http://www.dantestella.com/technical/nikoleic.html
about Nikkor Sonnars, specially 50mm lenses: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=94432
Sonnar Nikkors are: RF: 50/2, 50/1.5, 50/1.4 (all versions), 85/2, 85/1.5, 105/2.5, 135/4, 135/3.5
F: early 105/2.5
listing Sonnar RF lenses: http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?t=69170
referring to the Nikkor-S Auto Nippon Kogaku 50/1.4 of the OP, like most f1.4/50mm it's a good lens, however sharpness of my copy wide open falls behind all my other f1.4/50, that is all Takumar versions, Pentax M and Rokkor MC ( considering that it's from one of the 'big guys', for me a bit disappointing, or better I think of the others to be exceptionally good? ) _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kopi234
Joined: 25 Jul 2012 Posts: 103 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 3:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kopi234 wrote:
hoanpham wrote: |
Bokeh is nice, and the last photo of motorbike is awesome.
How far did he make it? |
i dont know for sure, texting while driving a motorcycle, maybe he has more eyes than two _________________ secangkir kopi, sebatang rokok |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|