View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
james
Joined: 25 Sep 2009 Posts: 308
Expire: 2011-12-28
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:30 am Post subject: Nikkor 180 with a "bad shave" |
|
|
james wrote:
That looks terrible! Have you shot it into strong light? I hope the prior owner paid you to take it away....
http://forum.mflenses.com/very-scratched-front-element-nikon-180mm-f2-8-ed-t36178.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
James, I did shoot on strong day light these samples , they are fine. If you question was did I shoot against sun I don't I never shoot against sun with any lens. I have several lenses with scratches , fungus etc, they are works fine. Nobody can say from sample images they was those lenses. Interestingly pros not care much about lens and they works fine for news papers , exhibitions etc. Amateurs not take lens with a small scratch 'because they are believe it it is visible on pictures' _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
james
Joined: 25 Sep 2009 Posts: 308
Expire: 2011-12-28
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:25 am Post subject: Nikkor 180 with a "bad shave" |
|
|
james wrote:
I am still surprised (in a good way) that the images you posted seem so unaffected by the degree & depth of the scratches on the front element. It probably has some effect on the images in odd lighting, if the light strikes the front element at certain angles. Congratulations on this excellent find! If used right, the Nikkor 180 ED AIS is a great lens. I've owned one for 15 years and despite its flaws with chromatic aberration (strong axial and lateral), it's a very sharp lens. A little heavy, though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:25 am Post subject: Re: Nikkor 180 with a "bad shave" |
|
|
Attila wrote:
james wrote: |
I am still surprised (in a good way) that the images you posted seem so unaffected by the degree & depth of the scratches on the front element. It probably has some effect on the images in odd lighting, if the light strikes the front element at certain angles. Congratulations on this excellent find! If used right, the Nikkor 180 ED AIS is a great lens. I've owned one for 15 years and despite its flaws with chromatic aberration (strong axial and lateral), it's a very sharp lens. A little heavy, though. |
Thank you ! This is a great lens indeed. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
I think it would be in our own interests to buy only lenses with "problems". I have a Canon FD 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical which has numerous marks on the front element and is very used on the outside, but it works perfectly and that's what counts. A smart user can save hundreds/thousands of euros by just selecting BGN lenses...
Of course, if you are a collector then that parts needs to be satisfied too. But it's not a guarantee that you'll end up with a good copy. I have bought and used hundreds of lenses now, and I can safely say that it's not uncommon for BGN lenses to be perfectly working and Mint copies to be duds... And those lenses were mint because their owners never took them from the bag, bad as the lenses were. _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Very true. I have often told people who were whingeing about scratched front elements this:
"Take a piece of string and lay it up against the front element. Select an aperture, look through the lens. Stop down the lens aperture, whatever. Can't see the string, can you? Now, just imagine how awful that lens's element would look if it had a scratch the same thickness as the string! Go take pictures and stop worrying about tiny scratches!"
I picked up a Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AIs for peanuts years ago because it has a pretty bad scratch on the front element. The lens works perfectly and takes great pics. Even though it's a wide angle, the scratch has no effect on the images. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Spotmatic wrote: |
I think it would be in our own interests to buy only lenses with "problems". I have a Canon FD 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical which has numerous marks on the front element and is very used on the outside, but it works perfectly and that's what counts. A smart user can save hundreds/thousands of euros by just selecting BGN lenses...
Of course, if you are a collector then that parts needs to be satisfied too. But it's not a guarantee that you'll end up with a good copy. I have bought and used hundreds of lenses now, and I can safely say that it's not uncommon for BGN lenses to be perfectly working and Mint copies to be duds... And those lenses were mint because their owners never took them from the bag, bad as the lenses were. |
Same experience here. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
"Take a piece of string and lay it up against the front element. Select an aperture, look through the lens. Stop down the lens aperture, whatever. Can't see the string, can you? Now, just imagine how awful that lens's element would look if it had a scratch the same thickness as the string! Go take pictures and stop worrying about tiny scratches!"
|
_________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|