| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 4123
Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:21 pm Post subject: Nikkor 1.8/105mm and 2.8/180mmED & TC 201 |
 |
|
Rolf wrote:
Hi,
normally I don´t like comparisons between 2 lenses because each one has its own characteristic.
This morning I have taken some shots on my "test field" which is our old graveyard nearby to see how the teleconverter TC 201 performs with these 2 lenses. The old stones etc. are a perfect subject to check sharpness, rendering, 3D, etc.
Both lenses will work with the converter but the 180 ED is better, maybe due to the ED glass in it. 3D effect is more visible.
Below the samples for the members with interest to buy such converter too.
I have forgotten, all shots wide open at ISO 1600 handhelded with Nikon D700
_________________
Rolf
Last edited by Rolf on Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:54 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Yebisu
Joined: 13 Feb 2011
Posts: 1299
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yebisu wrote:
Wow! Both look great to me. The last 180mm pic is pin sharp |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 2:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
These are just damn fine results, better than on my Oly without TC 
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
For what is my personal concept of 3D in photos, I find it more in the photos of the 105mm than in the photos of the 180mm.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Joined: 02 May 2009
Posts: 4123
Location: NRW/Germany
Expire: 2015-12-26
|
| Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Rolf wrote:
| Orio wrote: |
| For what is my personal concept of 3D in photos, I find it more in the photos of the 105mm than in the photos of the 180mm. |
Indeed. After a longer time not viewing the pics I think too that the 105mm is not bad. Especially in # 3.
_________________
Rolf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AussieBob
Joined: 14 Aug 2010
Posts: 49
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
AussieBob wrote:
Nice pics Rolf,
I have the 180mm & also a 105mm f2.5 AIS & was thinking about getting one of these TC-200/201's. Do you happen to know if they would work on a D80 & D40? I mean would they mount OK without breaking/bending any lugs? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6950
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I much prfer the bokeh on the 105.
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
