View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
jun_1.8T
Joined: 30 Aug 2010 Posts: 7 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:05 am Post subject: need focal length suggestions |
|
|
jun_1.8T wrote:
its me again....
just wanted to know on what do you guys suggest me getting in regards with focal lengths. will probably shoot more people rather than landscapes or architecture in which i plan on taking them too. what 3 focal lengths lenses you guys suggest me carrying all the time??? i don't want any zooms...just straight prime lenses. you guys are more than welcome to suggest what kind(focal length and aperture) of lens should i get.
thanks again! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ylyad
Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Posts: 476 Location: Zentralschweiz
Expire: 2013-12-05
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
ylyad wrote:
It depends on your camera (FF? APS-C? µ4.3?)
On APS-C, I use 50 and 135 for your kind of pictures. You could consider a 85 too, maybe combien with a 35 to replace the 50. _________________
Camera: Fuji X-E2, Fuji X100T
MF: Canon nFD 50/1.4, Canon nFD 100/2.8, Tokina RMC 135/2.8
Tamron SP 24-48/3.5-3.8
http://www.flickr.com/derdide/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
50mm on FF, 35 on crop, 25 on 4:3 _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009 Posts: 1693 Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
it depends how much of their body you want to show in the photos.
usual portrait lengths are 85mm to 105mm, but if you want more background in the photo you should use wide angle lenses, 28mm or even less...i shot a portrait of a friend with nikkor 20mm/4 , more like a snapshot and it gave me result that makes me wanna explore portraits with that lens
as for aperture...the faster the lens the thinner dof is, so more difficult to nail the focus right on the eyes... you should look for lenses 85-105 mm with aperture 2-2.8 , but any lens can serve this purpose if it has nice bokeh to separate the object of the portrait from the background _________________ my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
If you use an APS-C cam:
2.8/24 - 1.4/50 - 2.8/105 (perhaps plus a compact 28 or 35mm lens)
If you use a FF cam:
2.0/35 - 1.8/85 - 2.8/135 or 2.8/180 (And a Zuiko 1.4/50 is so small that you don't even realize you also carry it around.) _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I use same focal length for all type of cam, 85mm for portraits. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
Without knowing your camera's format, we can't make good suggestions. It's like asking "What shoes should I get?" when we don't know your foot size. But if you can calculate formatfaktor, consider this:
Back in the day, a 135/FF (35mm) photographer might carry a few specific primes. 24-28mm for real wide, 35mm for moderately wide, 50-58mm for long normal, 85mm for close portrait, 135mm for long portrait, 200mm for tele.
Now translate those numbers for your camera.
Attila wrote: |
I use same focal length for all type of cam, 85mm for portraits. |
At one time I shot official and unofficial portraits, using both my own and the organization's gear. I shot in 9x12, 6x6, 135/FF, and 135/HF (close to APS-C). In all formats, 80mm was my preferred focal length. The field-of-view varies but the perspective relationships remain the same.
The FF:HF formatfaktor suggests that a 58mm lens on APS-C is the same as 85mm on 135/FF, and for angle-of-view that's true, but not for perspective. A 90mm on APS-C is NOT the same as 135mm on 135/FF. Lenses in the 50-58mm, 80-90mm and 135mm ranges, no matter the field-of-view, have certain qualities of rounding or flattening of subjects. Shorter is rounder, longer is flatter, and 80-90mm is just about right.
Which focal length is *best* for portraits is a matter of individual taste. On another forum we discuss one photographer's preference for 180-200mm at f/2.8 on APS-C as a portrait favorite. We've seen fine full-body portraits shot at 15-20mm on APS-C. If I were shooting a Mafiya funeral, I'd use a 1000mm mirror from a safe distance. _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jun_1.8T
Joined: 30 Aug 2010 Posts: 7 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jun_1.8T wrote:
oh sorry guys....im using a Nikon D80 so it is a 1.5 crop sensor.
thanks for all the suggestions...i think i will be getting a 35mm, 85mm, and 105/135mm lenses. so i stick with Nikon AI-S lenses or are there any other good or even better alternatives out there???
thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ylyad
Joined: 01 Jun 2010 Posts: 476 Location: Zentralschweiz
Expire: 2013-12-05
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ylyad wrote:
RioRico wrote: |
At one time I shot official and unofficial portraits, using both my own and the organization's gear. I shot in 9x12, 6x6, 135/FF, and 135/HF (close to APS-C). In all formats, 80mm was my preferred focal length. The field-of-view varies but the perspective relationships remain the same.
The FF:HF formatfaktor suggests that a 58mm lens on APS-C is the same as 85mm on 135/FF, and for angle-of-view that's true, but not for perspective. A 90mm on APS-C is NOT the same as 135mm on 135/FF. Lenses in the 50-58mm, 80-90mm and 135mm ranges, no matter the field-of-view, have certain qualities of rounding or flattening of subjects. Shorter is rounder, longer is flatter, and 80-90mm is just about right.
|
Thanks for this, I had the same feeling but didn't know how to describe it. I almost convinced myself of not looking for an 85. You ruined my effort _________________
Camera: Fuji X-E2, Fuji X100T
MF: Canon nFD 50/1.4, Canon nFD 100/2.8, Tokina RMC 135/2.8
Tamron SP 24-48/3.5-3.8
http://www.flickr.com/derdide/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 5:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
jun_1.8T wrote: |
oh sorry guys....im using a Nikon D80 so it is a 1.5 crop sensor.
thanks for all the suggestions...i think i will be getting a 35mm, 85mm, and 105/135mm lenses. so i stick with Nikon AI-S lenses or are there any other good or even better alternatives out there???
thanks |
Nikon AIS lenses are top performers I don't think so you need anything else than Nikkors. I suggest to take wider lenses also like 20 or 24mm mm lenses. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RioRico
Joined: 12 Mar 2010 Posts: 1120 Location: California or Guatemala or somewhere
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RioRico wrote:
ylyad wrote: |
RioRico wrote: |
Lenses in the 50-58mm, 80-90mm and 135mm ranges, no matter the field-of-view, have certain qualities of rounding or flattening of subjects. Shorter is rounder, longer is flatter, and 80-90mm is just about right. |
Thanks for this, I had the same feeling but didn't know how to describe it. I almost convinced myself of not looking for an 85. You ruined my effort |
Pity. One of my stranger and more satisfying efforts involved my ordering a brace of FSU enlarger lenses, about US$20 each shipped from Ukraine. One was an Industar-58U 75/3.5. What I got is a big weird black trumpet. See it here. I shoved some PK-mount macro tubes on it to give it a mount with a fixed-focus distance of around 1.5m, which makes it quite good for headshots, even if it is a bit intimidating. And yes, I can change the tube for other distances.
I also use enlarger lenses in the 75-105mm range on bellows for portraiture. Being flatfield, they give corner-to-corner sharpness for situations where that is desirable. Most (Vivitar, Rodenstock, Apos, Novoflex, Industar) cost under US$10. Good EL-Nikkors can be bought cheap also. And there's just something about shooting portraits with a bellows... _________________ Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, K-1000, M42s, more
The simple truth is this: There are no neutral photographs. --F-Stop Fitzgerald
Last edited by RioRico on Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:50 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
jun_1.8T wrote: |
oh sorry guys....im using a Nikon D80 so it is a 1.5 crop sensor.
thanks for all the suggestions...i think i will be getting a 35mm, 85mm, and 105/135mm lenses. so i stick with Nikon AI-S lenses or are there any other good or even better alternatives out there???
thanks |
The 35mm and 135mm should be reasonable, but the 85mm and 105mm options are pricier. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jun_1.8T
Joined: 30 Aug 2010 Posts: 7 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jun_1.8T wrote:
thanks for all the inputs
so i would grab for now a 55mm 3.5 and a 135 3.5mm both AI-S nikkors. and then later on when i saved up enough money i will also grab a 20mm/24mm, and a 105mm.
does that sound good??? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Good plan, do it. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
135mm might be a tad long on a crop camera for portraits, unless you want head only or must be distant from subject
I'd go for 35mm and 85mm _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nikos
Joined: 17 May 2010 Posts: 1077 Location: Greece
Expire: 2015-01-02
|
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nikos wrote:
Orio wrote: |
135mm might be a tad long on a crop camera for portraits, unless you want head only or must be distant from subject
I'd go for 35mm and 85mm |
+1 _________________ Νίκος • www.diafragma.gr
Cameras: Canon EOS 5D Mark II, Sony α7R, Sony NEX-5N
MF lenses:
SLR:
Canon TS-E 17mm f/4, Zeiss 2.8/21 ZE, Zeiss 2/28 Contax, Zeiss 2/35 ZE, Zeiss 1.4/50 Contax, Zeiss 1.4/85 Contax, Zeiss Makro 2/100 ZE,
Zeiss 2/135 Contax, Zeiss 2.8/135 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 35-70 Contax, Zeiss Vario-Sonnar 100-300 Contax, Zeiss F-Distagon Rollei, Canon FD 24mm f2, Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm f2.8
Rangefinder:
Zeiss 4.5/21 C Biogon ZM, Zeiss 2/35 Biogon ZM, Voigtländer 15mm f/4.5 Heliar L39, Leica Tele-Elmarit 2.8/90mm, Zeiss 2/45 Contax G, Zeiss 2.8/90 Contax G, Canon 50mm 1.8 LTM
AF lenses: Canon 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, Canon 24-70 f/2.8 L, Canon 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, Canon 70-200 f/4 L, Canon 300 f/4 L IS, Canon 100 f/2.8 macro
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
35 f/2.8, 50 f/1.7 or f/1.4, 85 f/1.4 and a 135 f/2.8. Then save for a good 200mm f/3.5. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|