View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Orio wrote: |
kds315* wrote: |
uhh, someone missed out on "potty training" when it comes to using proper language I guess, just missing the f-word and the n-word then all would have been said. Do we really need to have that here, or start having that here...???? |
I agree with Klaus. |
I agree with Klaus too, but he was talking about bad language. It's offensive and unnecessary, and instead of looking cool as I guess was intended, it looks childish and demeans the discussion. But I didn't see anything too bad in this thread - was something deleted?
I've never heard of an n-word. Maybe I had a sheltered upbringing _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
I agree with Klaus too, but he was talking about bad language. It's offensive and unnecessary, and instead of looking cool as I guess was intended, it looks childish and demeans the discussion. |
I completely disagree with your judgement.
There are ways and ways to present one's opinions. It is possible to disagree on a subject without using derogatory comments on the other persons' arguments (here defined as bullshit) and without presenting your own arguments as if they were the absolute truth. The two posts Klaus referred to are full of lapidary final statements that are not proved in any way and quite distant from reality, yet they were presented in a harsh, defying and uncolloquial tone as if they were undisputable truths coming from "the one who knows it all".
Perhaps Klaus did not express properly his objection when he spoke of "language", he should have talked of "tone" instead, but I think I understand what he was meaning and that is why I agree with him. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
In my opinion Zewrak was very impolite with his post, please avoid next time in the future.
If anybody love a thing and tell us his story, very, very impolite to say this is bullshit like Zewrak did. Zeiss only a name... _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
convert1
Joined: 05 Aug 2008 Posts: 100 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Sep 09, 2008 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
convert1 wrote:
Well, it is difficult to choose the right words to express one or more opinion, especially about the lenses belongs to another person.
This situation will be found in every forum, thats why I avoid it.
Just my two cent.
@voytek, it seems , you are lucky with H'blad lenses.
I saw so many pictures in your page, there are wonderfull !
Did you compare H'blad lenses with russian lenses ?
Regards _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/convert1/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|