View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
hk300
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1041 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hk300 wrote:
I have more M42 lens to Pentax K body adapters for lens with Auto-pin for sale.
Price is still the same: EUR13.5 / USD17 including registered airmail. _________________ No longer member , please don't try to contact to him |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gus Helios
Joined: 10 Feb 2009 Posts: 144 Location: Cali
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gus Helios wrote:
Alex, I have a original and a knock-off m42-K... the original I can take out of the camera with my fingernail, the knock off requires a tool and even then was hit and miss.
Does your adaptor with the flange (brilliant idea) come off the camera as easy as the original or does it need a tool?
Thanks
gus _________________ Nothing a shot a jack and some George Jones can't fix - Gus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hk300
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1041 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
hk300 wrote:
Gus Helios wrote: |
Alex, I have a original and a knock-off m42-K... the original I can take out of the camera with my fingernail, the knock off requires a tool and even then was hit and miss.
Does your adaptor with the flange (brilliant idea) come off the camera as easy as the original or does it need a tool?
Thanks
gus |
i guess you need a tool (which is enclosed), but since I do not have a Pentax body i am not sure if you can also remove it without a tool. _________________ No longer member , please don't try to contact to him |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spiralcity
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Posts: 1207 Location: Chicago, U.S.A
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spiralcity wrote:
Gus Helios wrote: |
Alex, I have a original and a knock-off m42-K... the original I can take out of the camera with my fingernail, the knock off requires a tool and even then was hit and miss.
Does your adaptor with the flange (brilliant idea) come off the camera as easy as the original or does it need a tool?
Thanks
gus |
The adaptor comes out very easy but you need to know how to do it. The tool is used to back the ring out as far as you can go, then lift the tool so it just barley grabs the slot and gently give it a final twist. the you can take it out bt hand. Really, pretty easy once you have the technique down. I have never had a problem removing this adaptor. _________________ Nikons : F4-EM-FG-FE2-FA-EL-FTN-N2020-N70-F Nikkorex
Fujica: ST605N-ST701-ST705-ST705W-ST801-ST901-AZ1-AX-3
Chinon: CE4s-CM4s-CM5
Pentax: ME-Soptmatic
Ricoh:XR6
Pentax- K10D
Lenses- M42's-Nikon F mount, Pentax PK
FREE PHOTOGRAPHY COURSE |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
I use my finger nail, that works fine too. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gus Helios
Joined: 10 Feb 2009 Posts: 144 Location: Cali
|
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gus Helios wrote:
Thanks for the feedback everyone... _________________ Nothing a shot a jack and some George Jones can't fix - Gus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
edumad
Joined: 11 Feb 2009 Posts: 348 Location: Esposende, Portugal
|
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:03 am Post subject: Re: M42-to-PK adapter with inner flange for auto-pin lens |
|
|
edumad wrote:
hk300 wrote: |
I have tested this adapter with many lenses, and most lenses (including my Carl Zeiss Jena 20/2.8, 35/2.4, 50/1.8, 135/3.5, Pentacon 50/1.8, 135/2.8, Tak 50/1.4, ...) will be able to go from full open to f22 or even smaller aperture.
However, some lenses can only go up to f11 and one only went to f8. Note sure if those lenses were having a faulty/sticky aperture auto-pin. |
I think its not a problem with the blades. I have found that if I depress the pin too much, the aperture does not operate properly. The range of operation of the pin seems not to be from fully extended to fully depressed.
I found that if I depress the pin with my finger there is a point where resistance is different, so I can detect that point and glue the pin there.
As this point may vary with lens, I don't see a way to working it out on these adapters.
I do like the idea though. For the lenses that do work, I wouldn'y mind converting them to PK. As anyone done this? _________________ TWAPSI - The World As Photography Sees It |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Poolhall
Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 1296
|
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poolhall wrote:
It is possible I did it with the Telear 200/3.5 that I got from Sichko, its not an auto lens but the same should apply. This is normally a Nikon fit lens but comes with an complete end to change it to M42. So firstly I changed the ends over, its only 4 small screws to do it, then put on a Roxsen infinity m42 -pk adapter, one of Alex's should work just as well. Then take off the screw that holds on the spring clip and remove the spring clip. Put the screw back in and use it to tighten the adapter to the m42 thread, but not too much or it will deform the thread. AS there is no clip now the lens will go on and off ok but can't lock, there are 2 solutions to this, 1) drill a hole in the bottom of the lens so that the PK mount locking pin will catch it, as in a PK mount lens or as I did, 2) instead of a larger hole, drill a small hole and use a small self tapping screw as a lug for the pk mount to catch. I find this is better but it will only work on some lenses that have enough clearance to do it. So I have a pk fit Telear 200 and the modification is removable. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
rawhead wrote: |
Glassless M42-F mount adapters can do up to 17ft or so, I believe. Of course, if you stop down to f16 or 22, I think you can "almost" get infinity due to hyperfocal. (I'm talking about 50mm lenses. You might get infinity with wider angle lenses). |
you will never get infinity if the register distance of the lens is shorter than that of the camera. You might obtain a decently longer DOF using superwide lenses by stopping down all the way as you said (and getting a bit of diffraction degrade as well...). But the trick will work only on small prints or the web. If you print medium-large size, the trick will show... _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Sun Jul 05, 2009 12:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
The last M42->PK mount adapter I got has a problem where, after mounting on the camera, just a slight pressure on the lens will make it continue rotating clockwise. The fix, somebody pointed out, was to use a dremel to trim one of the blades, which I haven't gotten around to, and frankly, shouldn't be necessary to do on a finished product. Has this been fixed at all, or are the ones you have basically the same ones from before?
Problem documented here:
http://forum.mflenses.com/pentax-k-m42-adapter-with-inner-flange-t16928,highlight,m42.html _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LittleSkink
Joined: 19 Mar 2010 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LittleSkink wrote:
sorry to bump an old thread, does anyone know if these, or something similar of good quality is still available?
and how close to Pentax adaptor quality are they ?
thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hk300
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1041 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hk300 wrote:
LittleSkink wrote: |
sorry to bump an old thread, does anyone know if these, or something similar of good quality is still available?
and how close to Pentax adaptor quality are they ?
thanks |
i still sell these, quality is good, but i heard that the Pentax is better, but also very difficult to get.
If you are interested, please send me a pm. _________________ No longer member , please don't try to contact to him |
|
Back to top |
|
|
CarbonR
Joined: 31 Dec 2008 Posts: 1969 Location: Clermont-Ferrand, France
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
CarbonR wrote:
As I'll order some of them (alex, check your mails ) I'll be able to do a fast review, I have an Asahi Pentax, and a Pentax (both originals) _________________ Cameras : Canon 5D, Pentax K100D, Pentax 6x7, Spotmatic
Lenses : 15mm to 1000mm (24x36)
My websites : [FR & ENG]Takumar - the eyes of the Spotmatic : info about all Takumar lenses // Kogaku - My photo site
I am selling : Takumar lenses and rare Pentax bodies, pm me if you're interested in something [MFLenses feed-back]
Information on Takumar lenses with samples :
Wide angle : Takumar 15/3.5 15mm, Takumar 17/4 17mm, Takumar 18/11 18mm, Takumar 20/4.5 20mm, Takumar 24/3.5 24mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V1 28mm, Takumar 28/3.5 V2 28mm, Takumar 35/2 V1 35mm, Takumar 35/2 V2 35mm, Takumar 35/2.3 35mm, Takumar 35/3.5 35mm, Takumar 35/4 35mm
Standard : Takumar 50/1.4 V1 50mm, Takumar 50/1.4 V2 50mm, Takumar 50/3.5 50mm, Takumar 50/4 50mm, Takumar 55/2 55/1.8 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V1 55mm, Takumar 55/2.2 V2 55mm, Takumar 58/2 58mm, Takumar 58/2.4 58mm
Short tele : Takumar 83/1.9 83mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85/1.9 85mm, Takumar 85/1.8 85mm, Takumar 100/2 100mm, Takumar 100/3.5 100mm, Takumar 100/4 100mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V1 105mm, Takumar 105/2.8 V2 105mm, Takumar 120/2.8 120mm
Telephoto : Takumar 135/2.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/2.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V1 135mm, Takumar 135/3.5 V2 135mm, Takumar 150/4 V1 150mm, Takumar 150/4 V2 150mm
Long tele : Takumar 200/3.5 200mm, Takumar 200/4 200mm, Takumar 200/5.6 200mm, Takumar 300/4 V1 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V2 300mm, Takumar 300/4 V3 300mm, Takumar 300/6.3 300mm, Takumar 400/5.6 400mm, Takumar 500/4.5 500mm, Takumar 500/5 500mm, Takumar 1000/8 V1 1000mm, Takumar 1000/8 V2 1000mm
Zoom : Zoom-Takumar 45~125/4 , Zoom-Takumar 70~150/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 85~210/4.5 , Zoom-Takumar 135~600/6.7
Achromatic : Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 85/4.5 , Ultra-Achromatic-Takumar 300/5.6 300mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rard731
Joined: 29 Jun 2010 Posts: 1 Location: New England, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 01, 2010 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rard731 wrote:
I hope they're still available (Alex, I've sent you a private message). Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cardiff_gareth
Joined: 21 Jun 2010 Posts: 136 Location: Vale of Glamorgan
|
Posted: Tue Jul 06, 2010 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
cardiff_gareth wrote:
As I just put into a PM to Alex does anyone know if Meyer-Optik Gorlitz lenses need this mount with the internal flange for the aperture pin or are they ok with the cheaper mount that doesn't have this internal flange
Also are they being supplied now with the modification mentioned or is that something that the user needs to do themselves when it turns up
Ta all !
Gareth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|