View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1826 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
Thank you about your feedback.
Seems that i need to order one of those adapters too as lately I'm collecting again some exakta lenses _________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy
Joined: 18 Dec 2010 Posts: 1258 Location: Down East, Canada, eh?
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy wrote:
uddhava wrote: |
I know this is kind of an old topic, but what would be considered good prices for the Zeiss lenses you mention? For the 20-21mm would Nikon or OM lenses be good choices also? Considering I have a 28mm lens already are the 20mm lenses definately the better choice in order to have variety? Thanks anyone. Sorry for my lack of knowledge. |
Going from 28mm to 20mm doesn't sound like much, but it's a huge difference.
http://photo.net/equipment/canon/efs18-55/zoom2s.jpg
It depends on what you like to shoot of course, 20mm is no good for portraits
Nikons and OMs are generally good lenses but they tend to be priced higher then Zeiss Jena. _________________ I welcome C&C, editing my pics and reposting them on the forum is fine.
NEX-F3
~~~~~~~~~
CZJ Sonnar 135/4, Biotar 58/2, Pancolar 50/2, Tessar 50/2.8, Flek 35/2.8, Flek 25/4
Super Takumar 135/2.5, 135/3.5, 100/4 bellows, 50/1.4, 28/3.5
Helios 58/2, 3M-5A 500/8, Mir 20M
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 - - - - - - - - Nikkor 200/4
Rikenon 28/2.8 - - - - - - - - Zeiss 50/1.7 Planar
PB 50/2.4, 135/2.8
Yashica 50/1.9, 28/2.8, 135/2.8
Hexanon 28/3.5, 50/1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3072 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
fuzzywuzzy wrote: |
uddhava wrote: |
I know this is kind of an old topic, but what would be considered good prices for the Zeiss lenses you mention? For the 20-21mm would Nikon or OM lenses be good choices also? Considering I have a 28mm lens already are the 20mm lenses definately the better choice in order to have variety? Thanks anyone. Sorry for my lack of knowledge. |
Going from 28mm to 20mm doesn't sound like much, but it's a huge difference.
http://photo.net/equipment/canon/efs18-55/zoom2s.jpg
It depends on what you like to shoot of course, 20mm is no good for portraits
Nikons and OMs are generally good lenses but they tend to be priced higher then Zeiss Jena. |
Thanks for that photo guide. So the difference between the 20 and the 28 is pretty big, but between 24 and 28 not so much.
So I should focus on getting a 21 or 20.
Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
since you are in Hungary you may find a 20mm Mir for a good price, see sample images here:
http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=mir%2020mm _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3072 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
std wrote: |
Thank you about your feedback.
Seems that i need to order one of those adapters too as lately I'm collecting again some exakta lenses |
The difficulty I have with the exakta to eos adapters is you have to take the adapter off the camera to change the lens
where as with the M42 adapters I can leave it on the camera making it much easier to change the lenses. The M42 adapters are much cheaper also. It's nice being able to use those different exakta mount lenses though and they are usually cheaper than their M42
counterparts. ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3072 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
What would be a good price? Thanks. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
until recently they still sold new from http://www.russianplaza.com/ but it seems that they are not selling them any more now. The slower Mir 20 f3.5/20mm used to cost 250 usd and the faster Mir 47 f2.5/20mm curiously for only 200. Used of course should be less than that, but I just checked ebay and it seems that, since they are not sold new any more, some sellers try to sell them quite more expensively now. Some still sell them for a decent price, between 150 and 200 usd for the 20M, see: http://www.ebay.com/sch/i.html?_odkw=mir+20&_osacat=0&_from=R40&_trksid=p2045573.m570.l1313&_nkw=mir+20m&_sacat=0
edit: just found that this place; http://top35mm.com/ is still selling them new, but now the '20'for 270 usd and the '47' for 300 usd _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3072 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
In Hungary there is still a chance to to get them for a budget price, but I have to be quick to buy them. I just missed out on two
opportunities for a Mir 20mm and a Flektagon 20mm.
Thanks for all of this info. I feel a little embarrassed you made so much effort. Sorry I didn't thank you sooner,
but my mother-in-law slept in my den last night so I had to abandon my computer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
you are very welcome
wish you much luck to find the right one _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 960 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
Japanese lenses are undervalued currently. The Yashinon 2/50 and Mamiya 2/50 are both excellent lenses, although the Yashinon I think is the better of the two. The Mamiya has distinct, noticeable boke', which is ok if you like that sort of thing. The Mamiya 28mm, and the Takumar 3.5/35 are also relatively cheap - although definitely more people appreciate them than the above lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|