Lens setup, every category MUST be different manufacturer

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

Memberlist

Profile

Lens setup, every category MUST be different manufacturer

Home Manual Focus Lenses

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author

Message

LucisPictor

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

Supporting Member

Expire: 2013-12-03

Posted: Mon Oct 29, 2012 10:27 am Post subject:

LucisPictor wrote:

Orio wrote:

Too tiresome game for me Laughing

I pass

Booooh!

Oreste wrote:

WolverineX wrote:

read the first post in this thread

I did read it. Where did I say I didn't read it? Where? I did read it! I don't understand. That's what I said: I DON'T UNDERSTAND!!!!!!!!!!

Be patient! After one or two years in this forum, you will understand. Laughing

_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!

Carsten, former Moderator

Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html

My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/

Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de

visualopsins

Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10969
Location: California

Supporting Member

Expire: 2025-04-11

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:43 pm Post subject:

visualopsins wrote: Damn, made me dream about it. Here's the Software Developer's solution Very simple for computer to generate all the possible lists given a complete list of all lenses including manufacturer name, focal length, and lens name. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4 Lenses: M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55 M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35 Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5 Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5 Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH) Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)

visualopsins

Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10969
Location: California

Supporting Member

Expire: 2025-04-11

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:50 pm Post subject:

visualopsins wrote:

Oreste wrote:

WolverineX wrote:

read the first post in this thread

I did read it. Where did I say I didn't read it? Where? I did read it! I don't understand. That's what I said: I DON'T UNDERSTAND!!!!!!!!!!

There is no particular utility -- only a mind exercise.

Make lists of different focal length lenses, each made by a different manufacturer. Longest list with most high quality lenses wins contest.
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮

Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)

Oreste

Level 2

Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Posts: 451

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:52 pm Post subject:

Oreste wrote:

visualopsins wrote:

Oreste wrote:

WolverineX wrote:

read the first post in this thread

I did read it. Where did I say I didn't read it? Where? I did read it! I don't understand. That's what I said: I DON'T UNDERSTAND!!!!!!!!!!

There is no particular utility -- only a mind exercise.

Make lists of different focal length lenses, each made by a different manufacturer. Longest list with most high quality lenses wins contest.

But why?

Pontus

Joined: 18 Dec 2011
Posts: 1471
Location: Jakobstad, Finland

Supporting Member

Expire: 2016-08-25

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:52 pm Post subject:

Pontus wrote:

visualopsins wrote:

Damn, made me dream about it. Laughing

Here's the Software Developer's solution Laughing

Very simple for computer to generate all the possible lists given a complete list of all lenses including manufacturer name, focal length, and lens name.

LOL, but how will the algorithm now which lenses are top notch? Will you rate them? Part of the assignment is that every lens chosen must be special in some way. At least very good, and prererrably unique in some way...
_________________
Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015)

Pontus

Joined: 18 Dec 2011
Posts: 1471
Location: Jakobstad, Finland

Supporting Member

Expire: 2016-08-25

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:55 pm Post subject:

Pontus wrote:

iangreenhalgh1 wrote:

I decided to have another go and think outside the box a bit:

Nice thinking there and quite impressive. I'm only familiar with a couple of these lenses. Have to look some of them up.
_________________
Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015)

LucisPictor

Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)

Supporting Member

Expire: 2013-12-03

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:37 pm Post subject:

LucisPictor wrote:

Oreste wrote:

visualopsins wrote:

Oreste wrote:

WolverineX wrote:

read the first post in this thread

I did read it. Where did I say I didn't read it? Where? I did read it! I don't understand. That's what I said: I DON'T UNDERSTAND!!!!!!!!!!

There is no particular utility -- only a mind exercise.

Make lists of different focal length lenses, each made by a different manufacturer. Longest list with most high quality lenses wins contest.

But why?

Because!

(Yeah, I know: don't feed the troll. But I just couldn't resist. Wink

)
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!

Carsten, former Moderator

twinquartz

Joined: 11 Jun 2012
Posts: 316
Location: Sweden

Supporting Member

Expire: 2013-10-29

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 6:27 pm Post subject:

twinquartz wrote:

Oreste wrote:

But why?

To exercise your mind & make you less one-track-minded.

WolverineX

Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Posts: 1693
Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:42 pm Post subject:

WolverineX wrote:

Pontus wrote:

Part of the assignment is that every lens chosen must be special in some way. At least very good, and prererrably unique in some way...

it would be interesting to make an opposite , the list of lenses that are especially bad Smile

_________________
my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash

http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html

Pontus

Joined: 18 Dec 2011
Posts: 1471
Location: Jakobstad, Finland

Supporting Member

Expire: 2016-08-25

Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 8:50 pm Post subject:

Pontus wrote: That would actually be harder. Good idea _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015)

Display posts from previous:

Home Manual Focus Lenses

Goto page Previous 1, 2

Page 2 of 2

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum