Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
Hi!
What I learned from sellers at camera shows, the performance of either is great. It's mainly the max. aperture (and thus the price) that is different.
Carsten |
Thanks Carsten.
I asked because I may be able to get a Summilux for a low price (low for Leica standard, that is).
But since I have noticed much performance difference from my Zeiss 50mms (the 1.7 being sharper, the 1.4 having a much better bokeh and saturation), I was wondering if there could be difference in the Leica 50mms too. And sometimes it's true that the faster lenses are not always the better ones.
The one thing I am not super happy about the Elmarit 35mm that I bought is the bokeh. It's a bit harsh and not even near the quality of a Mir or Zeiss. But I guess this is the price you pay for the extra clarity of image that the Elmarit delivers and that the other lenses simply do not. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |