| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
AMDBill
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 109
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 3:35 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
AMDBill wrote:
i love mine ,a lot of CA ,but i don t care
the beroflex weight 1100Gr approximatively
and your's ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 2495
Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 12, 2010 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
I'll post a picture of the lens tomorrow 
_________________
(almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cheekygeek
Joined: 05 Aug 2008
Posts: 183
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 12:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
cheekygeek wrote:
To help keep the discussion more clear, please specify the filter size of the lens you are referring to. There were 135mm f1.8 lenses with an 82mm filter size and later version(s) with 77mm.
_________________
DSLR: Pentax K-3 II, D-BG5 grip, SLR: Pentax SP500, Pentax SP, Pentax SP II, Pentax Spotmatic F, MX, ME-Super, Super Program, pZ-1
Lenses:
Tele-Takumar: 300mm f6.3; 200mm f5.6; Takumar 200mm f3.5; Takumar 135mm f3.5; Macro-Takumar 50mm f4 (1:1)Super Takumars: 24mm f3.5, 55mm f2.0, 135mm f3.5; S-M-C Takumar 35mm f3.5, 50mm Macro f4.0 (1:2), 50mm f1.4, 135mm f2.5 (v2); Pentax SMC K 17mm f4 fisheye; Pentax-A: 50mm f1.4, 35-70mm f4; Pentacon: 50mm f1.8; Spiratone 85mm f1.8 (y/s); Vivitar: 85mm f1.8 preset; Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon Electric 35mm f2,4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 9096
Location: Houston, Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
| cheekygeek wrote: |
| To help keep the discussion more clear, please specify the filter size of the lens you are referring to. There were 135mm f1.8 lenses with an 82mm filter size and later version(s) with 77mm. |
The one I had, which I think was a Sigma, was 82mm. M42 mount. It was pretty old.
_________________
Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
AMDBill
Joined: 09 Feb 2010
Posts: 109
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
AMDBill wrote:
hello
mine is 82mm filter tread and weight 1100gr ,huge and heavy
love it in low light ,but can't use it under sunshine ,even stop down at f8-11 ,to much flare and coma
with a flash it s very good too ,seems to be more crispy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JWH
Joined: 26 Aug 2009
Posts: 120
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JWH wrote:
Ah fun seeing my thread filled with amazing info!
I have yet to try my sample out under conditions for which it's made, or so I think. During the day with the sun out it's indeed not the prettiest lens, but I'm thinking of taking it with me on a gig when I to one with harsh lights. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008
Posts: 4045
Location: Netherlands
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 13, 2010 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
| AMDBill wrote: |
hello
mine is 82mm filter tread and weight 1100gr ,huge and heavy
love it in low light ,but can't use it under sunshine ,even stop down at f8-11 ,to much flare and coma
with a flash it s very good too ,seems to be more crispy |
With a flash almost any lens shows good results...
I never liked the 135mm f/1.8 Eyemik I had, indeed due to the abundance of coma. This lens is very picky and works well with isolated subjects.
_________________
Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008
Posts: 2495
Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 14, 2010 9:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
| AMDBill wrote: |
| @ No-X can you post a pic of youre's ? |
1:1.8 f=135mm No.532xxx lens made in Japan SPIRATONE PLURA-COAT By Mitake
 
- native M42
- 8 aperture blades
- A/M switch
- 82mm filter thread
- close focusing: 1.7m
- aperture values: 1.8-2.8-4-5.6-8-11-16
- length (without M42 thread): 92mm
- weight (approximate): 810g
- front element: significantly curved
- rear element: almost flat
- optical design: 5/4: 111-2, likely ernostar-type
_________________
(almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 544
Location: London, UK.
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 15, 2010 5:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
Some of you may remember my Y/S mount Sigmatel Multi Scalematic 135mm f1.8, which is razor sharp at f4-F5.6...It has a 77mm filter thread.
I only have a kitchen scale which is'nt very accurate but it gives the weight of the bare lens, with a Y/S-M42 adapter fitted as 825g. With both lenscaps, an M42-SA adapter plus a Sonia Brand 77mm lenshood fitted the weight according to my kitchen scale is 950g.
I have tried the trick of shining a torch through to see how many elements it has but I cant see anything so I have'nt a clue which of the 4 types it is? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
doodleink
Joined: 02 Dec 2009
Posts: 6
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
doodleink wrote:
How much does this lens sell for? and/or how much have you guys purchased this lens for? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mflex-on
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
mflex-on wrote:
| no-X wrote: |
I agree... it is heavy, it's difficult to focus precisely, the lens has tons of CA, halos, maybe the design shows all currently known optical aberrations (maybe it has even the currently unknown ones  ), but it simply WORKS
And that's the reason why I keep my copy |
To choose a green backgraund is the best idea regarding the tons of green aberrations  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
mflex-on
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
mflex-on wrote:
| doodleink wrote: |
| How much does this lens sell for? and/or how much have you guys purchased this lens for? |
The lens is listed in the "Kadlubek’s lens catalogue" for 130 EUR. That is a appropriate price I think.
On ebay I think you can start around 180 ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ZoneV
Joined: 09 Nov 2009
Posts: 1632
Location: Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 17, 2010 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ZoneV wrote:
I bought mine a long time ago, I suppose that the price on the flea market was under 100 DM - which is now only ~ 50 Euro.
But the lens had a big scratch on the front lens, some 50 millimeters long.
Without long shade the contrast is often very, very bad.
Furthermore I found some mild fungus on the inside of the last lens.
The last Ebay auction ends at 231 Euro!
_________________
Camera modification, repair and DIY - some links to look through: http://www.4photos.de/camera-diy/index-en.html
I AM A LENS NERD!
Epis, Elmaron, Emerald, Ernostar, Helioplan and Heidosmat.
Epiotar, Kameraobjektiv, Anastigmat, Epis, Meganast, Magnagon, Quinar, Culmigon, Novotrinast, Novflexar, Colorplan, Sekor, Kinon, Talon, Telemegor, Xenon, Xenar, Ultra, Ultra Star. Tessar, Janar, Visionar, Kiptar, Kipronar and Rotelar.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 544
Location: London, UK.
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2011 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
| mflex-on wrote: |
| no-X wrote: |
I agree... it is heavy, it's difficult to focus precisely, the lens has tons of CA, halos, maybe the design shows all currently known optical aberrations (maybe it has even the currently unknown ones ), but it simply WORKS
And that's the reason why I keep my copy |
To choose a green backgraund is the best idea regarding the tons of green aberrations |
What green abberations? Heres one from the Sigmatel with a green background:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wwu124
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Posts: 30
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:34 pm Post subject: My Formula 5 MC 135/1.8 by Mitake |
|
|
wwu124 wrote:
Check out my Formula 5 MC 135/1.8 by Mitake on my Minolta 7D. I have converted this lens to Minolta/Sony A-mount. Here is the link:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwu124/sets/72157626686621855/
_________________
I am a Minolta shooter, currently using Minolta 7D most of the time. Here is my major lens collection list (all Minolta AF except those with notes added): 28/2.0, 35/2.0, 100/2.0, 100/2.8 Macro, 135/2.8, 50/1.4, 50/1.7, 50/2.8 Macro, 85/1.4, 28-135 Secrete Handshake, 75-300 Big Beercan, 24-105 D, Sony 70-200G SSM, MC Rokkor-PG 50/1.2 converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount, RF Rokkor-X 250/5.6 converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount, Formula 5 MC 135/1.8 by Mitake converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wwu124
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Posts: 30
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 12:48 pm Post subject: My Formula 5 MC 135/1.8 by Mitake |
|
|
wwu124 wrote:
I have no idea why the link in my previous message does not show up. Let me try again:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwu124/sets/72157626686621855/
_________________
I am a Minolta shooter, currently using Minolta 7D most of the time. Here is my major lens collection list (all Minolta AF except those with notes added): 28/2.0, 35/2.0, 100/2.0, 100/2.8 Macro, 135/2.8, 50/1.4, 50/1.7, 50/2.8 Macro, 85/1.4, 28-135 Secrete Handshake, 75-300 Big Beercan, 24-105 D, Sony 70-200G SSM, MC Rokkor-PG 50/1.2 converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount, RF Rokkor-X 250/5.6 converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount, Formula 5 MC 135/1.8 by Mitake converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy
Joined: 18 Dec 2010
Posts: 1258
Location: Down East, Canada, eh?
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 1:15 pm Post subject: Re: My Formula 5 MC 135/1.8 by Mitake |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy wrote:
First time users can't post images or links, as an anti-spam measure.
Now you're fine, welcome aboard!
_________________
I welcome C&C, editing my pics and reposting them on the forum is fine.
NEX-F3
~~~~~~~~~
CZJ Sonnar 135/4, Biotar 58/2, Pancolar 50/2, Tessar 50/2.8, Flek 35/2.8, Flek 25/4
Super Takumar 135/2.5, 135/3.5, 100/4 bellows, 50/1.4, 28/3.5
Helios 58/2, 3M-5A 500/8, Mir 20M
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 - - - - - - - - Nikkor 200/4
Rikenon 28/2.8 - - - - - - - - Zeiss 50/1.7 Planar
PB 50/2.4, 135/2.8
Yashica 50/1.9, 28/2.8, 135/2.8
Hexanon 28/3.5, 50/1.4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tardegardo
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 42
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 9:13 am Post subject: Re: It's HUGE! - Porst 135/1.8 |
|
|
tardegardo wrote:
Hi,
I also own this lens (found it at my wife's old house); bought a M42 adapter for my canon 5dmkII and put it on.
The problem is that I cannot infinite focus. I saw that the lens has a strange M42 adapter attached on it, it's not native M42.
I unscrewed it and found out a strange mount I never saw. You can see pics here: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?p=1222257#1222257
Do I need another adapter to be able to use this lens with my 5d and keep infinite focus?
[quote="JWH"]Today the Porst 135 f/1.8 arrived which I had recently bought from a forum member. My first impressions were WOW, what a piece of glass!
First experiences were quite alright and wide open it performs just about what was expected. Lots of CA and softness but no wonder with such opening! But I tried it a low light situation and there it really shines.
However it is quite a hard one to use when you have to stop it down a few. The shutter time together with the lack of stabilization makes it tricky, any tips on this?
Here's some photo's of the lens itself. I'd rate it R for the huge exposure  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wwu124
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Posts: 30
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:16 pm Post subject: Best use this lens on a micro 4/3 or a Sony NEX |
|
|
wwu124 wrote:
You loss infinity focus since the lens rear element is too far away from the film/sensor plane. You may consider using this lens on a micro 4/3 or a Sony NEX, using an adapter for these two types of mount. Then you will have infinity focus. In addition, with the Sony NEX, you have the Manual Focus Assist capability and Focus Peaking capability, which makes manual focus like a breeze. I have a folder here for MC-mount lens on NEX:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wwu124/sets/72157628038466027/
With my 135/1.8, I did a conversion to Minolta/Sony A-mount some time ago. I regret now, since it is much easier to use on NEX. When I find the time, I will convert it back to the original MC mount so I can use on my NEX with the MC-NEX adapter.
_________________
I am a Minolta shooter, currently using Minolta 7D most of the time. Here is my major lens collection list (all Minolta AF except those with notes added): 28/2.0, 35/2.0, 100/2.0, 100/2.8 Macro, 135/2.8, 50/1.4, 50/1.7, 50/2.8 Macro, 85/1.4, 28-135 Secrete Handshake, 75-300 Big Beercan, 24-105 D, Sony 70-200G SSM, MC Rokkor-PG 50/1.2 converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount, RF Rokkor-X 250/5.6 converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount, Formula 5 MC 135/1.8 by Mitake converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wwu124
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Posts: 30
Location: Texas
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:26 pm Post subject: about NEX |
|
|
wwu124 wrote:
If you do not want to spend a lot of money, you may find a slightly out-dated NEX-3 at a very low cost. The NEX-3 is what I have.
_________________
I am a Minolta shooter, currently using Minolta 7D most of the time. Here is my major lens collection list (all Minolta AF except those with notes added): 28/2.0, 35/2.0, 100/2.0, 100/2.8 Macro, 135/2.8, 50/1.4, 50/1.7, 50/2.8 Macro, 85/1.4, 28-135 Secrete Handshake, 75-300 Big Beercan, 24-105 D, Sony 70-200G SSM, MC Rokkor-PG 50/1.2 converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount, RF Rokkor-X 250/5.6 converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount, Formula 5 MC 135/1.8 by Mitake converted to Minolta/Sony A-mount |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tardegardo
Joined: 10 Apr 2012
Posts: 42
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject: Re: about NEX |
|
|
tardegardo wrote:
| wwu124 wrote: |
| If you do not want to spend a lot of money, you may find a slightly out-dated NEX-3 at a very low cost. The NEX-3 is what I have. |
Thamkyou. But i have already a pen m4/3 and I'll try that.
I also solved the infinite focus problem. The lens had a strange small ring mounted on. I managed to unscrew it and now it works just fine.
And I love this lens. Specially from 2.8 on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
