Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

F16 rule extended?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:22 am    Post subject: F16 rule extended? Reply with quote

I found this advice, but what next?

16 sunshine
11 weak, hazy sun (soft shadows)
8 cloudy bright (no shadows)
5.6 open shade or heavy forecast

what then:

4 -- ?
2.8 -- ?
2 -- ?
1.4 -- ?


PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 11:28 am    Post subject: Re: F16 rule extended? Reply with quote

kansalliskala wrote:

4 -- ?
2.8 -- ?
2 -- ?
1.4 -- ?


.......problems with cheap lens.... Laughing Laughing Laughing

Anyway, this is a very good link...... http://www.fredparker.com/ultexp1.htm


PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi, kansalliskala. I'm not sure if I'm understanding what you mean. The "Sunny 16 rule" is just a rule of thumb to determine a right enough exposure w/o a light meter. Basically it states that assuming the shutter speed being 1/film_speed the matching aperture to get a correct exposure will be the one corresponding to the lighting condition of the scene (as per the table you reported). Thus to use a different aperture you just need to adjust the shutter speed accordingly.

For a 100 ASA film you'll have a speed of 1/100" approximated to the nearest available of 1/125".

Assuming "sunshine" you'll have to use f16.

If you want to use let's say f8 you'll have to adjust the speed to 1/500".

Hope this helps, assuming was this you meant.
Cheers, Marty.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

marty wrote:
Assuming "sunshine" you'll have to use f16.

If you want to use let's say f8 you'll have to adjust the speed to 1/500".

Hope this helps, assuming was this you meant.


He meant that the shutter speed remains constant and only the aperture changes, i.e. in “weak, hazy sun” open up to f/11 while keeping the exposure time at the reciprocal of ISO sensitivity. So, the question is, what kind of “typical” situations could the rule be extended to apart from those listed?


kansalliskala wrote:
4 -- ?


I'd say:

4 -- “Not so open shade” or open shade when the sunlight is weaker.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 4:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks magnet-2009

then 2.8 would be
"Landscapes and skylines immediately after sunset. Crescent moon (long lens)."
and 2 would be
"Landscapes, city skylines 10 minutes after sunset. Neon lights, spotlighted subjects. "

asa 100 and 1/100
might be?


PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Exactly, you know how to read tables[Exposure Factor Relationship Chart B] and relate the data on another one[Exposure Value Chart] . Idea Idea Very Happy

If your camera doesn't support 1/100, then use 1/125. Wink


PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think maybe Magnet, you meant for the bold text to be links?

Several months ago, a member of another forum -- and I don't recall which one now -- put together a nice set of descriptions for suggested exposure values ranging from EV -6 to EV 17. And just to make it most useful, he also put together a chart showing the ratio of ISO/shutter speed/apertures based on these EVs.

He then uploaded the files to the forum. I could have sworn I had the files on my computer, but I cannot find them anywhere, so I did the next best thing, and scanned the pages I printed out. I printed the info on both sides of a single piece of paper, then folded it and put it inside a camera bag. So it's kind of wrinkled and dog-eared, but it is legible. I scanned at 200 dpi, which is adequate for text. Even so, the two files are large, about 900k apiece.

http://michaelmcbroom.com/lightsit1.jpg
http://michaelmcbroom.com/lightsit2.jpg

I have found this chart to be very useful because of the descriptions for lighting situations for all practical Exposure Values. In many cases, it obviates the need for an exposure meter.

I would recommend you do as I, if you find these charts useful, and print them out two-sided on a single page because its easier to stow in a camera bag.

If (when?) I can find the original files, I will repost links to them here.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

cooltouch did you request permission to use these tables from Fred Parker? Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing

The link was given above...... http://www.fredparker.com/ultexp1.htm


PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

magnet-2009 wrote:
cooltouch did you request permission from Fred Parker? Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing


Well, I'll be darned. Ah, I see the link now. Missed it earlier. Instead I googled "Fred Parker" and "Exposure Values" and got this hit:

http://www.fredparker.com/ultexp1.htm#Light%20Intensity%20Chart

So the guy who posted what I downloaded just "borrowed" FP's charts. Oh well. FP does invite folks to d/l his charts, so I don't see the harm in posting. Thanks for the link, though. It's a valuable source of info.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, being in the UK, Sunny 16 rarely applies! Laughing

Wet & windy 4 seems better. Laughing


PostPosted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing

That's right but you always get beautiful saturated results... Laughing

No need for polirizing filters. Wink Laughing


PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you very much for the links.

For a while I tried to understand what the mystical letters on the left meant, was it some memory code: "E", "V", "N" .. etc then I looked at the righmost column "S","H","U","T","T","E","R" Smile Very Happy


PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 8:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do you think this would work?



PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 11:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

in my own experience, when using colour negative film, F16 is for VERY bright sunlight, such as at the beach or on the snow, where the ambient reflections intensify the luminosity.

I follow this scheme and always found it correct for me:

F16 = very bright clear sky (at sea places, snowy mountains, sand deserts)
F11 = clear sky in normal places
F8 = sky veiled by very thin clouds
F5.6 = partly cloudy
F4 = full cloudy (overcast)
F2.8 = full cloudy (overcast) with dark and dense clouds

Plus you have these additional rules:

- shift of one stop the whole scheme in the half hour preceding the sunset
- shift of two stops the whole scheme in the 15 minutes after sundown.

BW negative, and slide film, are not to be used with the F16 scheme as they require more precise exposure than colour negative film.


PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 3:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Could be better.

Also 1 stop more in the spring and autumn 2 more in the winter on our latitudes. Mad

It is always surprising how inefficient is artificial lighting. A room that looks normal is pretty dark when you look at light meter.


PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I thought B&W negative film was very forgiving? My last roll of Tri-X with my hand held meter looked ok, and I was adding an extra stop if I wasn't sure.


PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kansalliskala wrote:
Do you think this would work?



It depends on what sort of film you're shooting. Your chart is about 1 stop underexposed from the Sunny F16 Rule. But this is correct exposure for slide film if your subject is predominantly white -- like a snow scene on a sunny day.


PostPosted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

martinsmith99 wrote:
I thought B&W negative film was very forgiving? My last roll of Tri-X with my hand held meter looked ok, and I was adding an extra stop if I wasn't sure.


That's my understanding too, although as is the case with any negative emulsion, it handles over exposure better than under exposure.


PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 7:20 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cooltouch wrote:
kansalliskala wrote:
Do you think this would work?



It depends on what sort of film you're shooting. Your chart is about 1 stop underexposed from the Sunny F16 Rule. But this is correct exposure for slide film if your subject is predominantly white -- like a snow scene on a sunny day.


Sorry, I didn't explain the symbols. Sunny should be 2nd row. First row is Sunny with reflections (snow, sand, sea).

I'm not going to publish this or anything, just glue it on the hanldebar of my sports-bicycle next summer. Smile
like this but with gears: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pcnotpc/2550152876/
http://forum.mflenses.com/what-are-your-plans-wishes-for-2010-t23652.html


PostPosted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:39 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I recall seeing exposure guides from Zeiss or Voigtlander or similar, from back in the day, that took into account the latitude and season...

I'd use your chart for ASA 160 color film in the summery months around New York, and in fact have done so with the Retinas.

--

The back of my Bessa 66 still has the original owner's crib sheet, which I transcribe here as a point of interest:

Verichrome Pan Index 100
Bt Sun f 16 1/100
Hazy Sun f 11 1/100
Cloudy Sun f 8 1/100
Open Sh f 5.6 1/100

A bog standard sunny 16 this, hardly worth taping onto the back of a camera


PostPosted: Fri Jan 22, 2010 9:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm thinking "really really simple rule" for pre-war folder use without meter. That could be a two-stop rule:

this is asa 100
very bright sunshine: 22 - 1/200
sunshine: 16 - 1/100
cloudy day: 11 - 1/50
really dark day: 8 - 1/25
evening, inside: open aperture more

and asa 400
sunshine: 22 - 1/200
cloudy day: 16 - 1/100
really dark day: 11 - 1/50
evening: 8 - 1/25
inside: open aperture more

I'm not sure but do you think this underexposes in the mid-section?