View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
gembobs
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 11:10 pm Post subject: Confused over M42 Adapters |
|
|
gembobs wrote:
Hi,
Just bought my first two MF primes today of e-bay - a Zeiss Jena 135 F3.5 and a Soligor 28mm F2.8! I got them both pretty cheap (£6 for the Soligor, and £38 for the Zeiss), so I am expecting to have to clean them / kill some fungus.
I have been looking at adapters to fit these lenses onto my Canon 40D, but after reading some posts on the web for what I should get I am really confused!
From what I can gather, the Zeiss does not need the adapter with a flange as it doesn't have a pin, but I think the Soligor looks like it does have a pin, so would need the flange? Would it affect the lens / camera if I used an adaper with a flange on a lens which doesn't require it or vice versa?
For these lenses, do I need the AF confirm chip? Should I be looking at the cheaper aluminium adapters or the brass ones? Can anyone recomend a retailer in the UK for these?
Sorry if these questions appear a little silly, but I just want to make sure I get the right adapter(s)!
Gembobs |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2008 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
These are right questions, I think some of our Canon owners will answer to you within one day.
Welcome to aboard! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
If your eyesight is like mine (failing with age after being poor when young) then I would strongly recommend the chipped version. Do some research to find the good ones (I don't think I have found the right one yet). Live view can help, but I find the confirmation quite effective/accurate most of the time.
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
hi,
there are lenses that need the flanged adapter, lenses that can use both, and (more rare) lenses that need the not-flanged adapter.
So I have both adapters in my arsenal, and I suggest you to do the same. If you have to start with only one, start with the flanged one because it covers most lenses. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gembobs
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
gembobs wrote:
Thanks for the tips, so now I know what I should be looking at a flanged adapter with a chip!
Anybody have any recomendations on where to buy one from in the UK?
Thanks for the advice so far! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2008 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I have the Zeiss 135 for my 40D. I use a AF confirm adapter on it. It doesn't need a flange and in fact it may be better without. I think I'm right in saying that if you have an M42 lens with an auto/man switch then the flange is not needed but it will work fine with either adapter.
If you have an adapter with the flange, you need to set the aperture to its largest setting, focus, then stop down to the required aperture.
If you have an adapter without the flange, you can do the above, or an easier way is to set the lens to the required aperture then set the auto/man to auto (which will open the aperture), when focused select manual (which will stop the lens down to the selected aperture) and shoot away.
The 40D has a tendency to overexpose with my zeiss by about a stop. Use centre weight metering get used to the lenses. The zeiss is a very sharp lens.
As to buying, UK doesn't have many options. I bought mine from US dealers www.fotodiox.com & www.goshotcamera.com. They both have ebay stores. I did have to chase go shot when they sent me a faulty adapter. The others I bought from them were fine, but I'm annoyed that I had to chase them for a refund.
Hope this helps. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
I'm sure everyone will have had his own experience, so advice will vary.
First, I would look for a brass adapter rather than aluminum: there is not a high risk of aluminum threads seizing on your lens, but the risk will be effectively eliminated if you choose brass.
You do not need a flanged adapter if your lens has either (1) a preset diaphragm or (2) an Auto/Manual switch. Most M42 lenses fall into one or the other of these groups, but not all; I would try to use lenses that do not need the flanged adapter, unless there is a particular lens that you really want that is Auto-only. The Auto stop-down pins are not exactly the same on all lenses, so the flange may work just right, or not press the pin all the way in, or hit bottom before the lens is fully seated, depending on the lens. Chances are it will work fine, but other things being equal I would prefer to leave this variable out of the equation.
A focus-confirmation chip will certainly do no harm, and you may find it helpful. If you go without it, and use fast manual lenses, you will probably get better results if you swap out the focusing screen with one that is designed for manual focusing. One frustrating thing for me with the AF chips is that they (of course) blink the AF light as you hit exact focus, and (also of course) the focus ring is moving when this happens. The result is that you never stop quite on focus but are constantly hunting back and forth trying to catch the signal light. I'm more comfortable using a better screen and trusting my eyes. _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Hi gembobs and welcome. I agree with Rick - in preference always go for an adapter without the flange whenever possible. There are some lenses whose rear element needs to pass right through the opening in the adapter, or have stop down levers and stuff, and sometimes the opening is too small. Helios and Tamron lenses are the only ones in my experience so far that need the flange.
I bought my M42 chipped adapters from happypagehk in Hong Kong. His site has some videos and examples of different adapters mounted on lenses. The adapters are very good quality and he's very knowledgable and helpful if you have any questions. I recommend him without hesitation.
Click here to see on Ebay _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
Helios and Tamron lenses are the only ones in my experience so far that need the flange.
Click here to see on Ebay |
I'm not sure which Helios you have, but I know the 44M that my wife has is mounted on a flangeless adapter. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
peterqd wrote: |
Helios and Tamron lenses are the only ones in my experience so far that need the flange.
Click here to see on Ebay |
I'm not sure which Helios you have, but I know the 44M that my wife has is mounted on a flangeless adapter. |
Hi, the Helios 44M has an A-M switch. The 44M-4 has a pin but no switch. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Throndor
Joined: 15 Sep 2008 Posts: 157 Location: Ankara / TURKEY
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Throndor wrote:
Is there ANY way, to convert an M42 lens to a K mount lens, without ANY risk of unscrewing and dropping the lens while focusing (particularly on lenses with a stiff focus) and still be able to reverse the procedure WITHOUT any permanent changes (like drilling) on the lens? _________________ Omer
Pentax K100D super
Pentax DA 18-55 AL
Pentax SMC-FA 50 f/1.4
Aus Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 (Zebra)
Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135/3.5
Varexon 35/2.8
Helios 44-2 58/2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 4:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
martinsmith99 wrote: |
peterqd wrote: |
Helios and Tamron lenses are the only ones in my experience so far that need the flange.
Click here to see on Ebay |
I'm not sure which Helios you have, but I know the 44M that my wife has is mounted on a flangeless adapter. |
Hi, the Helios 44M has an A-M switch. The 44M-4 has a pin but no switch. |
Ok, so I think that my other post may be correct, in that, if you have an A/M switch either adapter works, but if there is no A/M swith then you need an adapter with the flange. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
That's correct: if you have a pin in the back, and no A/M switch or cocking lever on the lens, then you will need the flanged adapter. _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
Throndor wrote: |
Is there ANY way, to convert an M42 lens to a K mount lens, without ANY risk of unscrewing and dropping the lens while focusing (particularly on lenses with a stiff focus) and still be able to reverse the procedure WITHOUT any permanent changes (like drilling) on the lens? |
There is no way of guaranteeing that with any M42 lens, with or without an adapter, unless you have one of those special-case full-aperture metering combinations like the Olympus FTL that had a lock button on its M42 mount. There is nothing on a normal screw mount lens to prevent it from unscrewing out of any mount if you twist hard enough. _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Throndor
Joined: 15 Sep 2008 Posts: 157 Location: Ankara / TURKEY
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Throndor wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
Helios and Tamron lenses are the only ones in my experience so far that need the flange.
|
My CZJ pancolar (Zebra) has no switch to keep the diaphragm stopped down. Just a metal lid that closes the blades but once you take your finger off it, it returns to its normal position and so does the blades. Plus it has a pin on the rear.. So i guess it too must be used with a flanged adapter. which leads me to "never can be focussed to infinity on a K-mount body".. _________________ Omer
Pentax K100D super
Pentax DA 18-55 AL
Pentax SMC-FA 50 f/1.4
Aus Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 (Zebra)
Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135/3.5
Varexon 35/2.8
Helios 44-2 58/2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
If it has a stop-down button, you can use it without a flanged adapter and push the stop-down button just before you release the shutter. This is more convenient than a flanged adapter anyway, because it lets you focus with the lens wide open and then stop it down qucikly just as you are about to shoot.
None of this has anything to do with focusing to infinity, though .... you've lost me there. _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Throndor
Joined: 15 Sep 2008 Posts: 157 Location: Ankara / TURKEY
|
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2008 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Throndor wrote:
rick_oleson wrote: |
If it has a stop-down button, you can use it without a flanged adapter and push the stop-down button just before you release the shutter. This is more convenient than a flanged adapter anyway, because it lets you focus with the lens wide open and then stop it down qucikly just as you are about to shoot.
None of this has anything to do with focusing to infinity, though .... you've lost me there. |
What i meant was since i have to use a flanged adapter (as no aperture switch exists) i will not be able to focus to infinity (as flanged ones do not let you do it).. I thought that it will not be convenient (not easy and will be more susceptible to handshake while holding the aperture button on the lens) to have one finger on the aperture button and one finger on the shutter release..
But i have no real life experience for such case and will surely try to use it as you recommend.. Thanx _________________ Omer
Pentax K100D super
Pentax DA 18-55 AL
Pentax SMC-FA 50 f/1.4
Aus Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 (Zebra)
Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135/3.5
Varexon 35/2.8
Helios 44-2 58/2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
We're talking about two different flanges on two different adapters that do two different things:
If you want to adapt an M42 to a K mount, the proper adapter fits flush inside the mount, with no flange sticking out in front. If you get an M42/K adapter with a flange around the outside on the front, you will not be able to focus to infinity on a Pentax K body.
But we're talking about adapting an M42 lens to a Canon. These adapters always have a flange on the outside, because the register distance of the M42 is longer than that of the Canon so you need an extra mm or so out front. But that is not the flange that we've been talking about up to now: the "flanged adapters" here have a flange on the INSIDE, in the BACK end of the adapter. The purpose of this flange is to depress the auto diaphragm pin on the lens as you screw it into the adapter. This flange has no effect on focus, unless you have an incompatible lens that hits the flange before it's fully seated into the mount.
Sorry if this is wordy, I'm trying to unconfuse you a little bit. _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Throndor
Joined: 15 Sep 2008 Posts: 157 Location: Ankara / TURKEY
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 11:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Throndor wrote:
Ah, thanx.. Clearer now.. _________________ Omer
Pentax K100D super
Pentax DA 18-55 AL
Pentax SMC-FA 50 f/1.4
Aus Jena Pancolar 50/1.8 (Zebra)
Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 135/3.5
Varexon 35/2.8
Helios 44-2 58/2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rick_oleson
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 386 Location: Lexington Kentucky USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rick_oleson wrote:
No problem!
Back to your situation with the M42-K adapter: As you suggested, you want a flangeless adapter that will fit entirely within the K bayonet, in order to allow infinity focus. The "flanged" M42-K adapters are easier to install and remove, but they will not allow infinity focus.
In either case, these adapters (the ones that I've seen, anyway) do not have a flange inside in the rear to depress the auto aperture pin in. So with any K mount adapter, you will want an M42 lens that will let you close the blades without having the auto pin pressed in from the back. These would include any lens that has an Auto/Manual switch; any lens that has a stopdown button; early auto lenses that required you to manually reopen the blades with a cocking lever on the side of the lens; and any manual or preset lenses. The only ones that will be a problem are auto-only lenses with no manual switch. _________________ I don't know what I want to be when I grow up |
|
Back to top |
|
|
montecarlo
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 1865 Location: Romania
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
montecarlo wrote:
rick_oleson wrote: |
No problem!
Back to your situation with the M42-K adapter: As you suggested, you want a flangeless adapter that will fit entirely within the K bayonet, in order to allow infinity focus. The "flanged" M42-K adapters are easier to install and remove, but they will not allow infinity focus.
... |
More simply :
(adapters that permit reaching infinity focus with M42 lenses on K Pentax mount cameras)
http://mac.tidings.nu/PinkyPentax/Images/Pentax/Lenses/Fisheyes/Peleng8mm/M42Adapter.jpg
http://www.jr-worldwi.de/photo/images/adapter_in_body_small.jpg _________________ Canonet QL17 III
Zenit E , Helios-44 58mm f:2.0 , Tair-11A 135mm f:2.8, Jupiter-9 85mm f:2.0,
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 35mm f:2.4
Pentax MX, ME Super, Chinon CE4/CM4, Petri MC 28mm f:2, smc Pentax-M 50mm f:1.7, Soligor T 135mm f:2.8
Minolta X500, Tokina 28/2.8, Rokkor 50/1.7, 80-205/4.5
Nikon D90, Nikkor 35/2.0, Nikkor 50/1.8, Sigma 24/2.8, Nikkor 18-105 VR |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gembobs
Joined: 02 Oct 2008 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
gembobs wrote:
I have bought a brass adapter with AF confirm chip with a flange - I figured that if the Soligor needs the flange it will work, if it doesn't then it may still work! If not, then it is no great loss!
Many thanks for all the tips and advice given, it is greatly appreciated! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|