View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rukmeister
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 Posts: 104 Location: Hobart, Australia
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:59 pm Post subject: Cimko MT Series MC 24mm f/2.8 |
|
|
rukmeister wrote:
I was a little surprised by this one. It turned out better than I thought it would. Couldn't find anything out about it on the net though, anyone know anything about this lens manufacturer or brand?
6 blad iris, oof aren't too bad. Reasonably sharp stopped down. Some CA, but not the worst I've seen.
Anyway, shot tripod mounted, iso 100, in camera NR, no sharpening, only WB adjustment from grey card in post. Sorry, taken on crop sensor -1.5x
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 749 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
CIMa KOgaku did a steady business as a maker of private label lenses through the 70s and 80s. Lentar, Focal and CPC are three that come to mind, though all three also used other suppliers.
The rear of the lens has a distinctive screw pattern for attaching the mounting flange to the body of the lens. While not user interchangeable in the sense of Tamron Adaptall mounts, a little skill and some small screwdrivers can be used to change that mount from one camera brand to another.
Adequate image makers. Nobody swears by them but nobody swears at them either. _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rukmeister
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 Posts: 104 Location: Hobart, Australia
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
rukmeister wrote:
Ahh. Thanks for the info!
I would have to agree about image quality. It isn't bad, but it isn't great either. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PBFACTS
Joined: 24 Dec 2008 Posts: 569
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
PBFACTS wrote:
casualcollector wrote: |
CIMa KOgaku did a steady business as a maker of private label lenses through the 70s and 80s. Lentar, Focal and CPC are three that come to mind, though all three also used other suppliers. . |
ALL magnon lenses were cimko lenses
Vivitar 28-50 was a cimko lens
Quality was medium/low but another big problem of cimko lenses was they did not have the dof preview button (om and m42 lenses) _________________ OM USER .. I KEEP/USE:
Om2 sp + T32 (grip/filter/zoom) + T8
+ Zuiko 16mm 3.5 / 55mm 1.2 / 65-200 4/ x1.4
+ Sigma 8mm 4.0 / 14mm 3.5 / 18-35 3.5-4.5
+ Tamron 35/105 2.8
+Tokina 150/500 5.6
+ Kiron 105/2.8 macro 1:1
+ Vivitar S1 90/180 falst field macro
+ 2x Doubler HR7
>>I SELL: OM10 + OM4ti
+ i sell: OM Md1 + Md 2 + Grip PowerPack + charger
+ i sell: OM Zuiko 24mm 2.8 / 28mm 3.5 / 50mm 1.8 / 50mm 1.4 / 50mm 3.5 macro / 35-70 3.6 / 35-105 3.5-4.5 / 75-150 4 / 500mm / 2xA
+ i sell: OM Kiron 28/105 3.2-4.5 / 1.5 converter
+ i sell: OM Makinon reflex 5.6/300 + Spector reflex (makinon) 500mm
+ i sell: OM Macro panagor extender 1:1
+ i sell: OM Sigma 16mm 2.8 fisheye (last version) / 21-35 3.5-4.2 ot/ 28-70 2.8 /1000mm mirror
+ i sell: Tamron 28-70 3.5-4.5 / 28-80 sp 3.5-4.2 / 28-135 sp 4-4.5 / /28-200 3.5 / 35-135 3..5-4.5 / 90mm sp macro 1:1 2.8
+ i sell: OM Soligor 2x doubler / x3 converte
+ i sell: Soligor FisheEye x0.15
+ i sell: OM Tokina 28/135 4-4.6 / 70/210 3.5 (= vivitar S1 v2)
+ i sell: OM Vivitar 28-70 3.5-4.8 / 28-90 s1 2.8-3.5 / 35-70 2.8-3.8 / 55/2.8 Macro 1:1 (komine) / 70-150 3.8 ot (kiron) / 75-150 ot 3.8 (tokina + 2x matched)
+ i sell : OM cosina 100-500 5.6/8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
Yes, I have the same lens (bought very cheap). It's certainly not the best 24mm on earth, but it is an adequate performer. _________________ Fujifilm X-Pro2 / Fujifilm X-T1 / some Sonnar & Takumar lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
In Australia you are so lucky to have this fantastic flora.
Banksia? _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rukmeister
Joined: 14 Aug 2010 Posts: 104 Location: Hobart, Australia
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rukmeister wrote:
I'm not sure. It doesn't look like most banksia I've seen (different flower structure). I do find it pretty though. Those flowers are huge ~ a good 15-20cm, and the stamen (?) is really unusual. Feels just like some creature's fur! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|