View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ChromaticAberration
Joined: 23 Dec 2010 Posts: 819 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChromaticAberration wrote:
Gorgeous, nice catch! _________________ Body: Fujifilm X-E1
Landscapes: Samyang 12mm f/2 NCS CS
Macro: Vivitar Series 1 105mm Æ’/2.5
Portrait: Helios-44 58mm Æ’/2.0
Low-light: SMC Takumar 50mm Æ’/1.4
_________________
Marketplace feedback
_________________
a pнoтograpн ιѕ neιтнer тaĸen or ѕeιzed вy ғorce. ιт oғғerѕ ιтѕelғ υp. ιт ιѕ тнe pнoтo тнaт тaĸeѕ yoυ. one мυѕт noт тaĸe pнoтoѕ.†– нenrι carтιer-вreѕѕon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
leo_b wrote: |
ChromaticAberration wrote: |
Yebisu wrote: |
I bought this lens a few weeks ago for 490 yen (5 dollars). |
If there was a prize you would be a serious contender, great pics! Nice colors, nice sharpness, nice bokeh, love it! |
+1
i like that glass too!
greets leo |
I have that and the f/2.8 version; both are wonderful lenses with great bokeh. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 3:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
eno789 wrote: |
Bought this Tamron 35-80mm 1:2.8-3.5 adaptall QZ-35M on Aug 20, 2010 for $5.50, plus $5.50 shipping.
|
What? Amazing bargain!
That lens is worth at least 10 times as much, probably much more! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Industar 61 2.8/52 L39 RF lens. 6 USD with a FED-4 body.
http://forum.mflenses.com/industar-61-52mm-f2-8-fed-4-lens-t39918.html _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I paid 1.50 euros for this lens, it was extrememly dirty and full of fungus, I gave it a good clean, face cream killed the fungus but the coatings are badly etched away where the fungus was, but it still works and I love the bokeh:
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I like that shot, Ian. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Okay, I've stayed away from the thread because while all of my lenses have been inexpensive, none have been as cheap as £5.00. However, I did but my Vivitar standard 135mm f/2.8 M42 Komine made for $9.99. Given the poor performance of the US $, that's just a tad over £5.00. I haven't used it very much because, like many others, I have many 135mm lenses and some better. I found it to be very good with an extension tube.
Orange you glad I'm done? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Cheers woodrim, I have quite a few lenses that fit the price limit for this challenge, some are junk, some surprisingly good, one problem for me is I'm still very much a beginner and struggle to get results from many of my lenses so to me, the best ones tend to be the ones I can use well.
I love your shots, particularly the dragonfly.
135mm is one length where decent lenses are easy to find, I have several that are decent to good.
Just tested the tiniest of the lot, a 3.5/135 Petri in K mount that I paid very little for, it's really small, half the size of most of my 135s.
I quite like it, and it's size is a big plus:
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
malaclypse
Joined: 02 Jun 2011 Posts: 46 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
malaclypse wrote:
Hello all,
in fact this contest made me sign on at MFlenses at last after being a lurker for some time.
So I have one lens that nearly had fitted, but as it was 13.14€ and the Exakta Camera which came with it as a rear lens cap was broken I can't say the camera was half the price. But the lens is obscure anyways: Meyer Optik Görlitz Trioplan 2.9/50.
But I have two lenses that fit in the price range, one is a Helios 2.0/58 which came with a broken Zenith camera on it's back for 5.50€ - but that was before the contest. And then I have this, which was after the first post but before I read it first:
Click here to see on Ebay.de
A Revueflex E with a little Industar 3.5/50 on it. For 2.52€ - and the relabled Zenith works fine, too. Just arrived, so no pictures yet. But to have the real fun, I'll just start looking for a new one. This will be big fun!
Your newbie,
Jürgen
Couldn't figure out how to get the flickr images in this post. Sorry. img - link /img didn't work
Last edited by malaclypse on Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:14 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
Welcome, Jürgen.
As an anti-spam measure, image posting in a member's first post is disabled. Now that you've posted your first post, you'll be able to post images.
Think I used the word "post" enough times? _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
malaclypse
Joined: 02 Jun 2011 Posts: 46 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
malaclypse wrote:
So then: A new try with the trioplan which by a closer look fits in the pricerange as there was a Pentacon 3.5/30 in the package, too:
Click here to see on Ebay.de
Halbmohn by Jürgen Klumpe, on Flickr
Blütentraum 2 by Jürgen Klumpe, on Flickr
Little Bug by Jürgen Klumpe, on Flickr
Last edited by malaclypse on Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:45 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
Hi Jürgen.
Go to your picture on Flickr. Right click, then click on properties. Copy the address (URL), e.g. for your first picture ...
http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5304/5670680165_eb946ea336.jpg
Then put "img" tags around it
[img]*http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5304/5670680165_eb946ea336.jpg*[/img] without the asterisks (*) and you get
Nice pic. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
malaclypse
Joined: 02 Jun 2011 Posts: 46 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
malaclypse wrote:
Thanks, just figured it out... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
56 DIN
Joined: 24 Apr 2010 Posts: 1656 Location: Germany Erbach /ODW
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
56 DIN wrote:
more than 5 "posts" in one post - congrats you got the postmaster degree _________________ Thomas
NEX & manual lenses
Nikon & manual lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
These are excellent! _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
56 DIN
Joined: 24 Apr 2010 Posts: 1656 Location: Germany Erbach /ODW
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
56 DIN wrote:
was looking for a lens for this threat and got a Konica Hexanon 135 f 3.5 for € 2.01 Click here to see on Ebay.de
this was today in the allotments ( is this the right word for making weekend/garden houses out of recycled shopping bags ? )
_________________ Thomas
NEX & manual lenses
Nikon & manual lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 8:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Yes, we would call that an allotment.
Nice shots, I have this Hexanon - EE 3.5/135, got it cheap and keeping it till I get a NEX. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
malaclypse
Joined: 02 Jun 2011 Posts: 46 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
malaclypse wrote:
Thomas: On which camera do you use the Konica lenses?
I like the last one the best. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
56 DIN
Joined: 24 Apr 2010 Posts: 1656 Location: Germany Erbach /ODW
Expire: 2021-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
56 DIN wrote:
welcome
....so do I ....like your last one best...the tube leaves more space for thoughts than flowers I am allowed to write this cause my government is on holidays
water shots with sun show a lot of CA with the Hexanon - i use it on NEX _________________ Thomas
NEX & manual lenses
Nikon & manual lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
malaclypse
Joined: 02 Jun 2011 Posts: 46 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
malaclypse wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
These are excellent! |
Thanks a lot. This little Trioplan is a gem. Overseen, as it mostly appears as an EXA-mount lens. Without a NEX or a 4/3 there are only a few chances to plug it to a digital camera. A costly one for Canon.
I found it by chance while looking for the 2.8/100 Trioplan on Ebay. And yes, it does strange things to highlights in the bokeh, too. My examples aren't interesting pictures, but to show the effect, I'll upload one ore two.
trioplan test 1 by Jürgen Klumpe, on Flickr
trioplan test 2 by Jürgen Klumpe, on Flickr
trioplan test 3 by Jürgen Klumpe, on Flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Nice examples Jurgen.
My Pentacon 1.8/50 M42 has similar bokeh to the Trioplan, as does my Meyer 3.5/135 Primotar, seems to be a characteristic of a few of the Meyer designs...
Pentacon 1.8/50 M42 wide open:
I could include this Pentacon in this challenge and I paid 6ukp for it attached to a Carena SRH760 SLR and with a Ensinor 2.8/28 with it as well, all three are in almost mint condition. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
malaclypse
Joined: 02 Jun 2011 Posts: 46 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
malaclypse wrote:
Yeah, I noticed that, too. In fact there is no single lens by Meyer Optik Görlitz I don't like. Ok, the Domiplan 2.8/50 has yet to be tested. The Pentacon 1.8/50 is georgeos, but I haven't loaded pictues of it to my computer, yet.
Which makes this competition a bit difficult. I could buy another Helios, Industar, Pentacon 1.8/50 for a proof. As they all fit in the competition I'll have a grand day out with them and post the results.
But for the competition I'll have to find something different. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
malaclypse
Joined: 02 Jun 2011 Posts: 46 Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Expire: 2015-11-04
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
malaclypse wrote:
As for your picture: Did you want the point of focus to be down and on the right hand? I'd taken the upsprining leaf in the middle. Ok, a little bit less of strangeness to the left, then.
If it goes for the charactaristics of the lens, you`re right... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I think the focus is too far to the front, a few cms further back would have been better, as you say.
I was just quickly testing the lens the day I got it, it's a good one.
Flares a bit though...
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|