| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 885
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2023 8:43 am Post subject: Canon FD 70-150 f4,5 |
 |
|
lumens pixel wrote:
I am trying to divert some traffic towards this Equipment and Repair thread since I would like to repair this fine lens: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-nfd-70-150-wobbling-t84466.html#1573887
This a very good lens provided you have a good copy which is quite difficult since build quality is suboptimal.
So to induce you to have a look there I am posting some pics. Best.
 Erable du Japon | Japanese Maple by lumens pixel, sur Flickr
Second pic with 20mm extension tube.
 Glycine by lumens pixel, sur Flickr
_________________
Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kathala
Joined: 13 May 2022
Posts: 142
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2023 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
kathala wrote:
if you have any tips to improve image quality, I'd be most happy. I have one that looks pristine and doesn't wobble, but even through the finder is clearly inferior to the 7o-21o/4 
_________________
Photography Reference Tables:
drive.google.com/drive/folders/1aJ5F8XM6t5AK4bydthcDoiwhsh5CUx3N
My Art and Books: ChristianSchnalzger.de
My Exploration of Panoramic Photographic Storytelling:
flickr.com/photos/hach_und_ueberhaupt/
The better you look, the more you see (B. E. Ellis) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
lumens pixel
Joined: 27 Feb 2019
Posts: 885
Expire: 2021-06-25
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2023 3:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
lumens pixel wrote:
| kathala wrote: |
| if you have any tips to improve image quality, I'd be most happy. I have one that looks pristine and doesn't wobble, but even through the finder is clearly inferior to the 7o-21o/4 |
This lens is very sharp so if yours is not OK even from viewfinder I am sure there is a problem. You should buy another one and hope for the best. My copy is not inferior to the 70 210 that I very much praise.
_________________
Lumens Pixel
-------------
Minolta SR mount: 16 2,8; Sigma SuperWide 24 2,8; 28 2,5; 28 2,8; 28 3,5; 35 2,8; 45 2,0; 50 1,4; 50 1,7; 50 2,0; 58 1,4; 85 2,0; 100 2,5; 100 4 Macro; 135 3,5; 135 2,8; 200 4; RF 250 5,6; 24-35 3,5; 35-70 3,5; 75-150 4; 70-210 4
Canon FD mount: Tokina RMC 17 3,5; 28 2,8; 35 2,8; 50 1,8; 50 3,5 Macro; 55 1,2; 135 3,5; 135 2,5; 200 4,0; 300 5,6; 28-55 3,5 4,5; Tokina SZ-X SD 270; 70-150 4,5; 70-210 f4; 80-200 4L; Tokina SZ-X 845
Tamron Adaptall: 28-80 3,5-4,2 (27A); 70-210 3,8-4 (46A); 60-300 (23A); 90 2,5 (52B); 35-135 3,5-4,5 (40A)
Tamron SP: 20-40 2,7-3,5 (266D) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015
Posts: 1662
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2023 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
Very good zoom. I had four and all of them had the last element with haze. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sergun
Joined: 01 Jun 2017
Posts: 291
Location: наша раша
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 25, 2023 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergun wrote:
There were two pieces. Both are "crooked". Good zoom.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/V5wvyJ8NZBBdJf848
_________________
https://www.flickr.com/photos/105161078@N06/
https://fotoload.ru/fotosets/6661/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kathala
Joined: 13 May 2022
Posts: 142
|
| Posted: Wed Apr 26, 2023 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kathala wrote:
| Quote: |
This lens is very sharp so if yours is not OK even from viewfinder I am sure there is a problem. You should buy another one and hope for the best. My copy is not inferior to the 70 210 that I very much praise. |
would you be able to show some direct comparisons? I'd be more than willing to buy another copy, but as it stands, I don't have high hopes since it really looks and feels pristine. I have tested a handful of 5o/1.4s, some looking new, some battered, and saw no difference in their results.
_________________
Photography Reference Tables:
drive.google.com/drive/folders/1aJ5F8XM6t5AK4bydthcDoiwhsh5CUx3N
My Art and Books: ChristianSchnalzger.de
My Exploration of Panoramic Photographic Storytelling:
flickr.com/photos/hach_und_ueberhaupt/
The better you look, the more you see (B. E. Ellis) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
