View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
mrQQ
Joined: 20 May 2009 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:20 am Post subject: Best M42 -> Nikon adapter with inifinity focus? |
|
|
mrQQ wrote:
Hello,
I found a thread saying that Kood one works pretty good. Are there even better ones, or should I just get that one? I have one from Russian site, but it doesnt seem to be too good.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
I have had very good results with a Kood adapter both with wide lenses such as the CZJ Flektogon 2.4/35 and longer lenses such as the Jupiter 37A 3.5/135. Other people have recommended the Bower adapter although some people seem to have had difficulty obtaining this recently. There are examples of the use of these adapters on this forum and elsewhere. I can provide further examples of the Kood if it's helpful to you. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008 Posts: 2441 Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
These topics will contain information relevant to you:
http://forum.mflenses.com/m42-to-nikon-adapter-t11704.html
http://forum.mflenses.com/m42-lenses-in-nikon-d200-t13039.html _________________ Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrQQ
Joined: 20 May 2009 Posts: 79
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mrQQ wrote:
sichko wrote: |
I have had very good results with a Kood adapter both with wide lenses such as the CZJ Flektogon 2.4/35 and longer lenses such as the Jupiter 37A 3.5/135. Other people have recommended the Bower adapter although some people seem to have had difficulty obtaining this recently. There are examples of the use of these adapters on this forum and elsewhere. I can provide further examples of the Kood if it's helpful to you. |
Is the Bower one this one: http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/97559-REG/General_Brand_ABNS_Nikon_AI_Body_to.html ?
and that BH one appears to be same as this one: http://cgi.ebay.de/Adapter-Nikon-M42-mit-Linse-aus-JAPAN-HOCHWERTIG_W0QQitemZ260417597066QQcmdZViewItemQQptZDE_Elektronik_Computer_Foto_Camcorder_Foto_Camcorderzubeh%C3%B6r_PM?hash=item3ca2192e8a&_trksid=p3286.c0.m14&_trkparms=72%3A1229%7C66%3A2%7C65%3A12%7C39%3A1%7C240%3A1318%7C301%3A1%7C293%3A1%7C294%3A50
are those "Bower" made? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 12:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
Yes they do appear to be the same. I'm not sure that I would recognise a Bower adapter. However they appear to be identical to my Kood adapter. The lettering is identical except that the Kood adapter has "KOOD" stamped on it in addition to "M42/Nikon JAPAN". The spanner is the same and the prrice is similar. It's possible that there are only a few manufacturers with each one supplying different outlets. But I can't be sure that the ones in your links are identical to the Kood - or the Bower. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|