Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

arista premium 400 (tri-x), hc-110 and zuiko 28/2.8
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:08 pm    Post subject: arista premium 400 (tri-x), hc-110 and zuiko 28/2.8 Reply with quote

dilution H (1+63), 72F, 10 minutes, 15 seconds, gentle agitation, epson 4490 scans.













still some long-axis curl in the film so scans aren't as good as they could be, but the betterscanning glass helped some in that regard.


PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Really good results you are getting from Tri-X and HC-110. I'm about to join you in that club Smile

Yeah, Tri-X is a pain with the curl. When Neopan 400 was available, I preferred it as it stays flat and was cheaper too... never mind the fine points of rendition and greyscale... I wasn't even looking at that!


PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like these a lot, nice tonal range and nice deep blacks, 4 is my fave, that seat looks so inviting, just sit and watch the world go by.


PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thank you, gentlemen ...


PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jussi and Paul, you guys are late to the table, but liking your results, Paul! Can't beat the convenience of HC-110 as a one-shot, was
the next dev after Thornton's I used a few years ago. And gives great results to a wide variety of film.


PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Handy dilution guide for different tank sizes:

http://mysite.verizon.net/fowler/photo/hc110.htm


PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks a bunch, bill.
hc-110 works out a whole bunch less expensive than tmax or ilfosol-3. i am happy with my first roll of ap 400/tri-x. my first roll with hp5 was a bit spotty. i figure it is a matter of time and agitation ...


PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I was told by folks that have used this dev since the 60's that too much agitation will up the grain and
contrast (HC-110 is a highly reactive dev).

@ 1+100 (HC-110F-G) AP 400 pushed to 1600, from 2009:


At high dilution it's a good candidate for semi-stand.


PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

good stuff ...


PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice results and well done with the difficult lighting.

With agitation, I only invert twice every 60 seconds with any film/dev combo as I have found grain builds up if you increase this.


PostPosted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 1:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks, martin. maybe two swirls with the paterson stick would be sufficient, rather than five.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

After drying leave film wound backwards in a film roll canister over night. It'll only bend in a horizontal way (like all film) instead of the top and bottom curling on itself and making scanning suck.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 8:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Beautiful light in #1, well catched.


PostPosted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks, orio.

by the way, i DO roll up the kodak film backwards and let set overnight. it does help some ...


PostPosted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

or sometimes a week... Honestly I never get back to it the next day but it behaves normally if I do that.


PostPosted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks, field. i'll build a couple of days into my workflow for the next roll.