View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ftngrave
Joined: 24 Dec 2012 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:07 pm Post subject: aperture and shutter in relation to image... |
|
|
ftngrave wrote:
This topic was part of another post, but I was wanting to try and expand on this particular subject.
Let's say I have a low aperture setting and a fast shutter speed, and a high aperture setting with a slow shutter speed (I think that's right) and my light meter tells me both are perfectly exposed. The depth of field will be different right?--I think the answer to this is definitely yes, but can someone clarify this for me?
This caused a user by the name of David to make a very interesting observation, with photo examples. He said, "In addition to Peter's answer, I would note that colors will be different based on those settings. If you ever shoot HDR, that uses different aperture settings to catch different colors and tones. But two photos exposed ideally with different aperture and shutter combinations can change how an image appears."
Here is an example. The first image was taken wide open (f2, I think) at a fast shutter speed. The second was at f8, slower shutter speed. Both were ideally exposed according to the light meter.
http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20131/6394_f2fastShutterSpeed_1.jpg
http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20131/6394_f8slowerShutterSpeed_1.jpg
So why is David's second photo more of a wash with less contrast in colors? Is it more due to the higher aperture, or does it have more to do with the slow shutter speed? I'm not sure how aperture exactly affects color, but I would think it's more due to the slow shutter speed.
Can anyone talk about the causal differences between David's two photographs? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
skida
Joined: 02 Mar 2012 Posts: 1826 Location: North East England
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skida wrote:
I would suspect that they are taken with a digital camera and something made the colour temporature change between shots. I have not experienced this on film. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 960 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
You use HDR to capture a set of different exposures, not identical exposures made with different settings. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I don't use different aperture settings to create HDR, that wouldn't work so well as the dof would change. i set the aperture then change the shutter speed for each exposure. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I experienced sometimes coloration differences from wide open to stopped down with some lenses.
I don't know what can be the cause. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:23 pm Post subject: Re: aperture and shutter in relation to image... |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
ftngrave wrote: |
Can anyone talk about the causal differences between David's two photographs? |
I have never come across any article talking about different aperture or different shutter speed causing different color rendering. I don't think that different shutter speed can made responsible but imagine that 'veiling flare' and other flaring issues when shot wide open possibly could have an influence?
some good articles:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/colour_theory.shtml
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials/understanding-series/lens-contrast.shtml _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
skida wrote: |
I would suspect that they are taken with a digital camera and something made the colour temporature change between shots. |
The two shots each have a different framing/perspective - maybe that makes a difference.
Each picture has a number of "white" spots. They are in different positions in the two pictures. Let's make a wild guess and assume that they are snowflakes. We can then use them as "white points" to adjust the colours. There is then a much better match between the colours in the two pictures. I won't show the results without the photographer's permission. But you can try it yourselves. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy
Joined: 18 Dec 2010 Posts: 1258 Location: Down East, Canada, eh?
Expire: 2013-11-30
|
Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:51 pm Post subject: Re: aperture and shutter in relation to image... |
|
|
fuzzywuzzy wrote:
ftngrave wrote: |
Let's say I have a low aperture setting and a fast shutter speed, and a high aperture setting with a slow shutter speed (I think that's right) and my light meter tells me both are perfectly exposed. The depth of field will be different right?--I think the answer to this is definitely yes, but can someone clarify this for me?
|
Yes, aperture affects depth of field (DoF).
Stopping down the aperture increases DoF. Opening up the aperture decreases DoF.
Let's say we've got a fast 50mm lens.
- For a landscape shot, stop down for more DoF. Now exposure increases and we may even need a tripod.
- Same lens, now we're shooting a pretty girl's portrait. It's currently fashionable to do that with a very small DoF, let's slide the aperture wide open. As a bonus exposure time gets quite short and we can stow the tripod. _________________ I welcome C&C, editing my pics and reposting them on the forum is fine.
NEX-F3
~~~~~~~~~
CZJ Sonnar 135/4, Biotar 58/2, Pancolar 50/2, Tessar 50/2.8, Flek 35/2.8, Flek 25/4
Super Takumar 135/2.5, 135/3.5, 100/4 bellows, 50/1.4, 28/3.5
Helios 58/2, 3M-5A 500/8, Mir 20M
Vivitar Series 1 70-210 - - - - - - - - Nikkor 200/4
Rikenon 28/2.8 - - - - - - - - Zeiss 50/1.7 Planar
PB 50/2.4, 135/2.8
Yashica 50/1.9, 28/2.8, 135/2.8
Hexanon 28/3.5, 50/1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|