View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 5:21 pm Post subject: Angenieux Paris 35mm f/2.5 |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
This lens looks very handsome!
http://www.mu-43.com/f81/angenieux-paris-35mm-f-2-5-type-r1-retrofocus-image-thread-22681/
Any clue? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Rare item that one.
The Angenieux 35/2.5 is fairly common in Exakta mount, but the one for Rectaflex is something else.
The Exakta mount ones come in different styles but none look like this.
I am assuming its the same lens.
I want one of these in Exakta for the sake of my collection but its not at all easy to find one cheap. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bob955i
Joined: 15 Apr 2007 Posts: 2495
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bob955i wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Rare item that one.
The Angenieux 35/2.5 is fairly common in Exakta mount, but the one for Rectaflex is something else.
The Exakta mount ones come in different styles but none look like this.
I am assuming its the same lens.
I want one of these in Exakta for the sake of my collection but its not at all easy to find one cheap. |
Or one that hasn't suffered from coating damage on the front element due to over-enthusiastic cleaning (very soft and easily damaged apparently). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
I have one in M42 mount. It's a pretty sweet little lens.
Very low contrast at all apertures. It just stays sort of neutral in a good way.
More a collectable than anything else in my opinion. There are better performing 35's but few as unique.
Gives a very classic look. A great lens if a vintage style on film is desired.
I'll come back with some samples one time. _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
indianadinos
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1310 Location: Toulouse, France
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
indianadinos wrote:
I have tested one in M42 mount ... Unluckily, its front coating was damaged (apparently, it was really fragile on this lens) ...
Low contrast and really prone to flare, no matter the f/stop, all the samples i have taken with it needed PP to be acceptable ...
And it had also a blades issue ...
Since then, i no longer have it and i'm not planning to buy one. For me, it remains more a collector item than a photographer lens (well, unless you are able to find one in true mint conditions) ...
My 2c ... _________________ Please visit my blogs Shooting with a Pentax K10D / FF Visions
Takumar: 24/3.5, 28/3.5, 35/2, 35/3.5, 50/1.4, 55/1.8, 85/1.8, 105/2.8, 120/2.8, 135/3.5, 150/4, 200/4
Pentax-K: M28/2.8, K28/3.5, M50/1.4, A50/1.7, M50/4 Macro, K85/1.8, K105/2.8, K135/2.5, M200/4, M70-150/4
Zeiss: Flektogon 20/2.8, 20/4, 35/2.4, 35/2.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Biotar 58/2, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer: Primagon 35/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Orestor 135/2.8
Schacht/Steinheil: Travenar 90/2.8, Travenon 135/4.5, Quinar 135/2.8, Quinar 135/3.5
Russian: MIR 37B, Industar 50/3.5, Helios 44M & 44M-2, Jupiter 37A
P6: Flektogon 50/4, Biometar 80/2.8, Orestor 300/4
Nikkor: Nikkor-O 35/2, Micro 55/3.5, Nikkor-S 50/1.4, Nikkor-Q 135/2.8
Fuji: EBC 28/3.5, EBC 55/3.5 Macro, EBC 135/2.5
Misc Lenses: Kiron 105/2.8 Macro, Tamron SP90/2.5
... and a few other Vivitar, Tamron, Sigma and Soligor lenses ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16663 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Have it too and have to confirm what Andy already stated: pretty low contrast, so expect some PP afterwards.
Fetches collectors prices, as it one of the first ever made retro lens designs, which Pierre Angenieux actually
invented. _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 5:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Yes, its a collectible really.
There are several other 1950's 35mm for Exakta.
The ones I have are the early Japanese retrofocus copies of the Angenieux.
The contrast isn't bad at all on these, but the corners are awful. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
takumat
Joined: 24 Mar 2007 Posts: 4 Location: Quebec City
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
takumat wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
Have it too and have to confirm what Andy already stated: pretty low contrast, so expect some PP afterwards.
Fetches collectors prices, as it one of the first ever made retro lens designs, which Pierre Angenieux actually
invented. |
It seems that P Angenieux invented the name "retrofocus" for a design that was already in use in cinema; but that he must be credited for making, with this R1 design, the first retrofocus lens for SLRs (that were beginning to take over the rangefinder cameras). The retrofocus name, btw not branded by Angenieux, stayed in use.
The 28mm I tried seems to be better than the 35mm: high definition and high contrast. A suitable hood and clean glass (no haze) are a must to achieve this. I don't think coating marks on the front element, common on these lenses, would alter the contrast in these conditions.
A test of Exakta lenses from the late sixties gives, at 1:100, a resolving power of 130 lines at f8 and f11 in the center (and 80 & 100 in the corners) for the 28mm, which was the upper limit reached by the best lenses tested (Summicron, Pancolar, etc.). Neutral color balance (rather uncommon then). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trifox
Joined: 14 May 2008 Posts: 3614 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-05-29
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
trifox wrote:
F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
I have one in M42 mount. It's a pretty sweet little lens.
Very low contrast at all apertures. It just stays sort of neutral in a good way.
More a collectable than anything else in my opinion. There are better performing 35's but few as unique.
Gives a very classic look. A great lens if a vintage style on film is desired.
I'll come back with some samples one time. |
very low contrast?
hm.. I have found my copy with exakta mount with enough contrast - just like zeiss.
CLICK ON THIS PICTURE:
_________________ Flickr.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Nice series! Colors are indeed slightly on the lower-saturated side compared to a modern Biogon T* etc. but I like the rendering very much.
It's all looking very sharp and natural. Great lens! _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language)
Last edited by ForenSeil on Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:42 pm; edited 5 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
As often, it really depends on the copy so it seems. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 577 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:17 pm Post subject: Alpa mount also |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
Two varieties, R1 and R11. At least one R11 of the first, non-preset type, (no 398141) was apparently produced in an Exacta mount and then equipped by a fixed Alpa mount. Looks like a factory job, same finish and firmly attatched, not a loose adapter.Same flimsy coating.
p.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
indianadinos
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1310 Location: Toulouse, France
Expire: 2011-12-05
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 6:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
indianadinos wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
As often, it really depends on the copy so it seems. |
+1 ... I got some fresh news from the owner of the lens i tested ... A few months after my sample shots, the inner group of the lens
has become really hazy (probably an adhesive issue), and now his lens is totally useless ... _________________ Please visit my blogs Shooting with a Pentax K10D / FF Visions
Takumar: 24/3.5, 28/3.5, 35/2, 35/3.5, 50/1.4, 55/1.8, 85/1.8, 105/2.8, 120/2.8, 135/3.5, 150/4, 200/4
Pentax-K: M28/2.8, K28/3.5, M50/1.4, A50/1.7, M50/4 Macro, K85/1.8, K105/2.8, K135/2.5, M200/4, M70-150/4
Zeiss: Flektogon 20/2.8, 20/4, 35/2.4, 35/2.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Biotar 58/2, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer: Primagon 35/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Orestor 135/2.8
Schacht/Steinheil: Travenar 90/2.8, Travenon 135/4.5, Quinar 135/2.8, Quinar 135/3.5
Russian: MIR 37B, Industar 50/3.5, Helios 44M & 44M-2, Jupiter 37A
P6: Flektogon 50/4, Biometar 80/2.8, Orestor 300/4
Nikkor: Nikkor-O 35/2, Micro 55/3.5, Nikkor-S 50/1.4, Nikkor-Q 135/2.8
Fuji: EBC 28/3.5, EBC 55/3.5 Macro, EBC 135/2.5
Misc Lenses: Kiron 105/2.8 Macro, Tamron SP90/2.5
... and a few other Vivitar, Tamron, Sigma and Soligor lenses ...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Nice shots Stan, that lens has a really nice rendering! Your daughter has a fantastic, moody pose in the last shot _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2012 9:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
Nice shots Stan, that lens has a really nice rendering! Your daughter has a fantastic, moody pose in the last shot |
if eyesight was microwaves, Stan's camera would have been ashes after _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cellotone
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 317 Location: US
Expire: 2020-09-24
|
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2020 10:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cellotone wrote:
[quote="luisalegria"]Rare item that one.
The Angenieux 35/2.5 is fairly common in Exakta mount, but the one for Rectaflex is something else. /quote]
Recently, I just acquired a Angenieux 35mm f2.5 original was in Rectaflex mount, the previous owner modified to Leica R mount. Is this lens different from the Exakta mount one? My is a quite nice copy. Thx! _________________ Nikon D600, Fujifilm X-E1, Sony A7R,
Leica R lenses, C/Y Zeiss lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cellotone
Joined: 13 Apr 2014 Posts: 317 Location: US
Expire: 2020-09-24
|
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2020 11:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cellotone wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Rare item that one.
The Angenieux 35/2.5 is fairly common in Exakta mount, but the one for Rectaflex is something else.
The Exakta mount ones come in different styles but none look like this.
I am assuming its the same lens.
I want one of these in Exakta for the sake of my collection but its not at all easy to find one cheap. |
I recently acquired this lens originally was in Rectaflex mount, then the previous owner modified to Leica R mount. It’s a quite nice copy. What Is the difference between the Rectaflex mount one from the Exakta mount one. Thx! _________________ Nikon D600, Fujifilm X-E1, Sony A7R,
Leica R lenses, C/Y Zeiss lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kymarto
Joined: 30 Nov 2016 Posts: 409 Location: Portland, OR and Milan, Italy
|
Posted: Sun Jul 12, 2020 10:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kymarto wrote:
I like this lens a lot. It has the kind of sharp bokeh that I prefer, although the Isco Westromat 35mm f2.8 beats it for both the sharpness and the "look" IMO. Here is the Angenieux first and Westromat second. Not exactly equivalent, but FWIW
#1
#2
_________________ Vintage lens aficionado |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2971 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2020 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
_________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tachi
Joined: 09 May 2020 Posts: 98 Location: China guangzhou
|
Posted: Mon Jul 13, 2020 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
tachi wrote:
It's a beautiful bokeh _________________ a person has no faith if he has no patience |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|