View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
padiej
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 244 Location: AUSTRIA - Burgenland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:21 am Post subject: 28mm TEST - ASAHI vs SOLIGOR vs AUTOREVUENON |
|
|
padiej wrote:
Hallo!
Three 28mm are now in competition:
1) Asahi Takumar SMC 28/3,5 M42 (Ebayprice: 34,16€) - like new
2) SOLIGOR C/D 28/2,8 PK (17€) blind is slow
3) AUTO REVUENON MC 28/2,8 PK (36€) - like new
The Soligor has a slow blind, the others are like new, super mechanik, clear and good maintained.
All of them are good, I think.
Soligor is the sharpest.
The Takumar are on M42, it could be the oldest len´s amongst them.
Another pic from the auto revuenon:
I hope, this test will show something about the 28mm lenses about 30€.
regards Peter _________________ Cam: Canon EOS 5D, 50D, 500D, Pentax Ist DL
Lenses on
www.flickr.com/photos/padiej/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Which aperture did you shoot the bookshelf with? _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
I'm surprised with the Takumar result.
I have this lens.
Any idea who made the Revuenon ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padiej
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 244 Location: AUSTRIA - Burgenland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padiej wrote:
An Carsten:
The aperture was 4,0.
A german side explain the source of revuenon:
Sigma or Mamiya and onother producer´s (lower quality)
www.allerlei.gmxhome.de/revue.htm _________________ Cam: Canon EOS 5D, 50D, 500D, Pentax Ist DL
Lenses on
www.flickr.com/photos/padiej/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
Are the bookshelf images possibly out of focus? Something seems "off" to me, maybe it's just my tired old eyes! _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
I think the bookshelf shots are crops. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
I'm surprised with the Takumar result.
I have this lens. |
Me too. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
My 28mm f3.5 SMC Takumar was quiet crappy. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
I think the bookshelf shots are crops. |
Hi luis - yes, they are crops...but it looks like the focus still might no be right on target. Again, might just be me.
And Peter, THANKS for posting. The Revuenon looks the best to me, on the bookshelf test. Maybe my eyes ARE all too old! _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Attila wrote: |
My 28mm f3.5 SMC Takumar was quiet crappy. |
Must have been a lemon I guess. I'm very pleased with mine
_________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2008 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Seems yes! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
hasan
Joined: 12 Mar 2007 Posts: 313
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
hasan wrote:
To be honest, up to this test, I never saw a bad looking image,
which came from a Takumar.
Peter, maybe you got a bad copy?! _________________ Pentax Z20 |Pentax K100D |SMC K35/3.5 |SMC K50/1.4 |SMC A50/1.4
|SMC K135/2.5 |SMC DA18-55 |SMC FA80-320 |AR 135/2.8(Chinon) |AR 55/1.4(M42)
|Sigma MF 90/2.8 |Sigma 28-80/3.5-5.6 |Exakta 24/2.8 |Vivitar 2x Macro Focusing TC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Takumars seem to be solid above-average lenses. I have two SMC Takumars and both are very good, although none is the best of what I have in the respective focal ranges. I'd summarize that they are solid lenses that you can trust. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padiej
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 244 Location: AUSTRIA - Burgenland
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padiej wrote:
I will send any pic´s from the takumar and the Soligor. I think, the takumar is also good.
regards Peter _________________ Cam: Canon EOS 5D, 50D, 500D, Pentax Ist DL
Lenses on
www.flickr.com/photos/padiej/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padiej
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 244 Location: AUSTRIA - Burgenland
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padiej wrote:
_________________ Cam: Canon EOS 5D, 50D, 500D, Pentax Ist DL
Lenses on
www.flickr.com/photos/padiej/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mjkerpan
Joined: 15 Mar 2008 Posts: 56 Location: Boston, USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
mjkerpan wrote:
Impressive start, though some crops from "real world" tests would be nice. I'm surprised at how well the Soligor did, given that brand's generally mediocre reputation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sun Apr 27, 2008 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Takumars seem to be solid above-average lenses. I have two SMC Takumars and both are very good, although none is the best of what I have in the respective focal ranges. I'd summarize that they are solid lenses that you can trust. |
The build quality of Takumars is fantastic, the best I have, but I think I have to reluctantly agree with you about the optics. Of the ones I have, the 1.4/50 Super-Tak is brilliant, on a par with the Pancolar 50, and the 3.5/135 S-M-C Tak compares with the CZJ 3.5/135 and the J-37A. The 85, 100 and 105 lenses seem to be popular too. But my 1.8/55 and 3.5/28 SMC are only a bit above average and the 3.5/35 is pretty ordinary. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padiej
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 244 Location: AUSTRIA - Burgenland
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padiej wrote:
A walk around with the takumar 1:3,5/25
aperture: 5,6
Pic´s are only resiced.
The lens works very well, but I miss a little bit sharpness. _________________ Cam: Canon EOS 5D, 50D, 500D, Pentax Ist DL
Lenses on
www.flickr.com/photos/padiej/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padiej
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 244 Location: AUSTRIA - Burgenland
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padiej wrote:
_________________ Cam: Canon EOS 5D, 50D, 500D, Pentax Ist DL
Lenses on
www.flickr.com/photos/padiej/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padiej
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 244 Location: AUSTRIA - Burgenland
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padiej wrote:
aperture 5,6 _________________ Cam: Canon EOS 5D, 50D, 500D, Pentax Ist DL
Lenses on
www.flickr.com/photos/padiej/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padiej
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 244 Location: AUSTRIA - Burgenland
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padiej wrote:
and another takumar test - pic´s
The lens is around 36 Jears old, and one of the first super-multi-coated. It´s like new, the last owner was very nice
Now, I will test the soligor, before the sun goes down.
greeting Peter _________________ Cam: Canon EOS 5D, 50D, 500D, Pentax Ist DL
Lenses on
www.flickr.com/photos/padiej/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padiej
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 244 Location: AUSTRIA - Burgenland
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padiej wrote:
Now some tries with soligor C/D 28mm 1:2,8 aperture 5,6
the soligor
the asahi takumar
The soligor is great, this is a good one, but this is fortune.
The aperture is slow, so I eliminate the aperture-stick, it´s only possible to work with the preset aperture (like M42-lenses).
salute Peter _________________ Cam: Canon EOS 5D, 50D, 500D, Pentax Ist DL
Lenses on
www.flickr.com/photos/padiej/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
padiej
Joined: 05 Apr 2008 Posts: 244 Location: AUSTRIA - Burgenland
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
padiej wrote:
The sun is in another position, sorry.
The soligor is not so colored. It´s another character. At last, I find the Takumar better, it´s a brisker imaging.
salute Peter _________________ Cam: Canon EOS 5D, 50D, 500D, Pentax Ist DL
Lenses on
www.flickr.com/photos/padiej/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Thank you, interesting comparison.
I don't think the contrast and color difference is properly compared because of the very different lighting, so I would make no conclusion there.
But the Soligor does seem sharper than the Takumar, that is easy to see. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Thanks for the test Peter
Based on resolution, color, contrast and chromatic aberrations those lens doesn't look very good to me
Maybe it is a processing problem
Do you shot in jpeg ?
What soft and procedure do you use ? _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|