| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:54 pm Post subject: Which one is better? |
 |
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Processed using two different softwares:
Both of these processed from the RAW file and uncropped, but one shows
more of the subject than the other. 
Bill |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10471
Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
#1
_________________
T* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
#1
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
#1 for me
#2 for my taste has too bright coloured shadows and too much contrast and/or sharpening in the highlights.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
maddog10
Joined: 08 Apr 2008
Posts: 1072
Location: Maryland, USA
Expire: 2015-02-12
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
maddog10 wrote:
#2 shows more details and looks processed.
BUT.......
#1 is a better looking photo. The colors are much more appealing to the eye. I without a doubt like #1 better.
_________________
Michael Hill |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 6:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
OK, first one is using PSE 4.0 RAW processing and second one is Bibble.
I'll rework this later to see if I can improve it in Bibble. I like that there is
more of the image with its software. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 10405
Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 01, 2008 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
| Seymore wrote: |
| #3 for me... |
Bee-otch!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
