View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
kievuser wrote: |
Two Nikon zooms, Ai 35-70mm F3.5 S/N 774014, and Ais 80-200/4 s/n 251798. I wonder how this Nikon 80-200/4 compares to Canon FD 80-200/4 L for about the same price when new? |
Two very good lenses there.
I am not sure of the differences between the Nikkor and the Canon, but I would guess that they are very close in actual performance.
Enjoy
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sergtum
Joined: 14 Nov 2016 Posts: 735
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sergtum wrote:
first shot (wide open)
a7+ makro rings (~8mm)+ Юпитер-8 "П" (КМЗ, №5414816) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 3754 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
kievuser wrote: |
Two Nikon zooms, Ai 35-70mm F3.5 S/N 774014, and Ais 80-200/4 s/n 251798. I wonder how this Nikon 80-200/4 compares to Canon FD 80-200/4 L for about the same price when new? |
Two very good lenses there.
I am not sure of the differences between the Nikkor and the Canon, but I would guess that they are very close in actual performance.
Enjoy
Tom |
On 24MP FF, I have checked the Ai 4.5/80-200mm (second, newer computation) as well as the later 4/70-210mm (both in its MF and AF variant), but not the AiS 4/80-200mm.
The Canon nFD 4/80-200mm, due to its excellent color correction, gives crisper and clearer images than the both Nikkors I tested. In addition, the Nikkor 4.5/80-200mm has more aberration problems @ 200mm f4.5 than the Canon L.
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
stevemark wrote: |
Oldhand wrote: |
kievuser wrote: |
Two Nikon zooms, Ai 35-70mm F3.5 S/N 774014, and Ais 80-200/4 s/n 251798. I wonder how this Nikon 80-200/4 compares to Canon FD 80-200/4 L for about the same price when new? |
Two very good lenses there.
I am not sure of the differences between the Nikkor and the Canon, but I would guess that they are very close in actual performance.
Enjoy
Tom |
On 24MP FF, I have checked the Ai 4.5/80-200mm (second, newer computation) as well as the later 4/70-210mm (both in its MF and AF variant), but not the AiS 4/80-200mm.
The Canon nFD 4/80-200mm, due to its excellent color correction, gives crisper and clearer images than the both Nikkors I tested. In addition, the Nikkor 4.5/80-200mm has more aberration problems @ 200mm f4.5 than the Canon L.
Stephan |
Tom and Stephan, Thanks for your reply.I guess they would perform about the same.But Stephan's answer is a surprise. My impression is that Nikon optics are always crisper and clearer. But I have never owned a Canon FD L series lens.Some are still quite expensive. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9097 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 5:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
kievuser wrote: |
Stephan's answer is a surprise. My impression is that Nikon optics are always crisper and clearer. But I have never owned a Canon FD L series lens.Some are still quite expensive. |
Well, you gotta keep in mind that the Nikon 80-200mm f/4.5 design was an old one when the Canon was new. Although the Nikon zoom has always been regarded highly (and I can see why, I own one), the AIs 80-200mm f/4 has been regarded as being notably superior to the older design. So this outcome doesn't really surprise me. And as good as the AIs 80-200 is, I wouldn't be surprised at all if the Canon outperformed it. The Canon 80-200mm f/4 L is regarded as one of the best zooms, if not the best, in that focal range with a max f/4 aperture. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2018 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
kievuser wrote: |
Stephan's answer is a surprise. My impression is that Nikon optics are always crisper and clearer. But I have never owned a Canon FD L series lens.Some are still quite expensive. |
Well, you gotta keep in mind that the Nikon 80-200mm f/4.5 design was an old one when the Canon was new. Although the Nikon zoom has always been regarded highly (and I can see why, I own one), the AIs 80-200mm f/4 has been regarded as being notably superior to the older design. So this outcome doesn't really surprise me. And as good as the AIs 80-200 is, I wouldn't be surprised at all if the Canon outperformed it. The Canon 80-200mm f/4 L is regarded as one of the best zooms, if not the best, in that focal range with a max f/4 aperture. |
So I was lucky as the seller had both 80-200/4.5 and 80-200/4 with the F4.5 version about 100 yuan RMB cheaper. I tried both lenses on a camera and "felt" the F4 one's image slightly clearer. I didn't know the aiS 80-200/4 was a better lens as I almost bought the F4.5 one.
The price for the Nikon ais 80-200/4 and Canon FD 80-200 L was about the same in Japanese yan, but in us dollars, the Nikon was $ 100 US dollars more expensive in 1988 according to ROTO CELL list($459.95 vs $559.95). The aiS 80-200/4 was sold for 7600 yuan RMB to professionals in early 1990 in Beijing, now a used one only cost less than 1/10th. IIRC, my monthly salary was only 3-400 yuan then. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
A new member of the ERA-family.... _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Focusthrow
Joined: 12 Sep 2017 Posts: 209
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Focusthrow wrote:
Klaus---the elegance (simplicity) of this lens is striking! I know nothing about it--can you tell us a little about its history or any other pertinent facts. It sure looks to be a clean version too. jt |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Fri Feb 02, 2018 8:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Focusthrow wrote: |
Klaus---the elegance (simplicity) of this lens is striking! I know nothing about it--can you tell us a little about its history or any other pertinent facts. It sure looks to be a clean version too. jt |
It is an old russian lens used for early computer chip making. High resolution, double gauss design.
Here shots with it: http://forum.mflenses.com/era-15-f4-5-125mm-takes-a-late-walk-t78042.html _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
An extremely rare Chinese micro reduction lens 120/4 made in early 1970's. I think it is similar to those Ultra Micro Nikkor lenses for the same applications.
I bought it many years ago, but Dr. Klaus's Russian ERA-15 125/4.5 reminded me of it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012 Posts: 1304 Location: Conwy N Wales
|
Posted: Sat Feb 03, 2018 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
The uncommon tokina made 100mm f2.8 in vivitar guise with a smart black leather case.
_________________ pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
kievuser wrote: |
An extremely rare Chinese micro reduction lens 120/4 made in early 1970's. I think it is similar to those Ultra Micro Nikkor lenses for the same applications.
I bought it many years ago, but Dr. Klaus's Russian ERA-15 125/4.5 reminded me of it. |
Here is an article about these special industrial lenses made by Nikon. I find them fascinating.
http://www.doc88.com/p-792387305883.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3437 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Russian projection lens I never have seen before: GOST 50mm 1.2.
Anyone known with this one? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Minolfan wrote: |
Russian projection lens I never have seen before: GOST 50mm 1.2.
Anyone known with this one? |
Isn't that identical (or very similar) to this one: http://allphotolenses.com/lenses/item/c_1423.html _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
Just picked up this somewhat unusual 105mm f2.8 lens. It is only my second Vernon Edonar lens.
Was fortunate auction closed early in the day on day of SuperBowl:
Click here to see on Ebay then click see original listing
The most recent prior auction for this lens I could locate closed about two years ago, here:
Click here to see on Ebay then click see original listing
That lens sold for rather more than I paid because, I think, the early morning timing of my auction stifled bidding.
This 105mm f2.8 Edonar, like many others, has the unusual, but characteristic, "triple band" focus grip.
I am delighted to have won this lens. I bid over US$50 and ended up paying much less than my bid. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Isn't that identical to the Kyoei Acall 105mm? _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
kds315* wrote: |
Isn't that identical to the Kyoei Acall 105mm? |
Hi Klaus
I would answer "no", but solely because I simply am not that fortunate. There is no other reason.
Here is the Kyoei Acall 105mm f2.8 I found:
http://sunrisephotohk.blog126.fc2.com/blog-entry-24868.html
You can blow that photo up if you click the photo.
Klaus, if I just bought a US$1300 lens for circa US$25, I will be throwing my own party today, it will have no relationship whatsoever to the SuperBowl, and you are invited!!
Please tell me I'm wrong. Please. Please tell me I just hit the jackpot!!
Lenses are fun and in the above I'm just having a bit of fun. Now seriously:
Vernon, back in the day, sourced lenses from a variety of manufacturers. I honestly do not know what company made the 105mm f2.8 for Vernon. It might have been Tamron. The subject lens, if it is in good shape, should be a decent performer. And it is somewhat rare. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7554 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 5:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Congrats for your $1300 lens
in HKD. _________________ https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2018 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
calvin83 wrote: |
Congrats for your $1300 lens
in HKD. |
Calvin83 you are a hoot!!
But hey, even in HK$ that would still be over $150! I'll take it (but no party). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Visionar 1.9/183mm
_________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 2:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
guardian wrote: |
kds315* wrote: |
Isn't that identical to the Kyoei Acall 105mm? |
Hi Klaus
I would answer "no", but solely because I simply am not that fortunate. There is no other reason.
Here is the Kyoei Acall 105mm f2.8 I found:
http://sunrisephotohk.blog126.fc2.com/blog-entry-24868.html
You can blow that photo up if you click the photo.
Klaus, if I just bought a US$1300 lens for circa US$25, I will be throwing my own party today, it will have no relationship whatsoever to the SuperBowl, and you are invited!!
Please tell me I'm wrong. Please. Please tell me I just hit the jackpot!!
Lenses are fun and in the above I'm just having a bit of fun. Now seriously:
Vernon, back in the day, sourced lenses from a variety of manufacturers. I honestly do not know what company made the 105mm f2.8 for Vernon. It might have been Tamron. The subject lens, if it is in good shape, should be a decent performer. And it is somewhat rare. |
Not that one with Leica thread mount, but this one Luis wrote about, which was sold under many brand names, including Petri: http://forum.mflenses.com/soligor-kyoei-105mm-f-3-5-t39488.html a $50 lens or thereabouts... _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
It surely is possible, Klaus. I do not have the lens yet. When it arrives I will compare.
Vernon sourcing is certainly fodder for discussion since their Edonar lenses are relatively rare. Edonar 105mm f2.8 lenses do not appear often on the market. The slower Edonar 105mm f3.5 lenses are seen somewhat more frequently. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 2:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
It's not a Kyoei Acall, I have the Kyoei 105 and 135mms and they are different.
I also had a 135mm that looks exactly like guardian's lens, with the three sections of knurling, it was rubbish so I took the glass out and used the helicoid to remount a projection lens.
With these 1960s Japanese low-end lenses, it's often nigh-on impossible to tell who made them.
Vernon Edonars are often Tamrons, but they also sold lenses from other makers. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2018 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Canon FD 2.5/135
7artisans 1.8/25 (Fuji X)
Canon FD 1.8/85
plus Novoflex-Adapter FD-NEX and a Canon F-1 _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kievuser
Joined: 27 Jan 2008 Posts: 551
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2018 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
kievuser wrote:
A FUJINON EFC 1:5.6/108 mini lab printer lens in LN condition. It has 8 aperture blades and adjustable to F11.Here is the lens, the zebra focusing tube is not included.
Last edited by kievuser on Wed Feb 07, 2018 11:01 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|