View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
hacksawbob
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1293 Location: LANCS UK
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 9:08 am Post subject: what are the different helios 44 versions |
|
|
hacksawbob wrote:
I ahve seen 44-2 44-4 and now a 44-6. Are they optically the same? _________________ LENS LIST |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mitchbuchanon
Joined: 06 Sep 2007 Posts: 29 Location: Bordeaux - France
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
mitchbuchanon wrote:
I m not a specialist of the Helios , but I think they are some differences ...
For exemple if I remember well , all the versions have not the same number of blades. _________________ 350 D / K10D - Zenitar 16 mm 2.8 - Tamron 28mm 2.5 - Mir-1B 37mm F2.8 - Pentax SMC Takumar 50 mm 1.4 - Pentax SMC 50 mm 1.7 - Helios 44M-4 - Helios 40-2 1.5 85 mm - Tamron SP 90 Macro -CZJ 135 m Sonnar 3.5 (and a bunch of others 135)- Pentacon 200 mm 4 - Tair 3-S 300 mm 4.5 - Meyer Telemegor 400 mm 5.5 ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 1098 Location: Jakarta
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:23 am Post subject: Re: what are the different helios 44 versions |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
hacksawbob wrote: |
I ahve seen 44-2 44-4 and now a 44-6. Are they optically the same? |
If I understand correctly Jean-Loup Princelle's book, the number after the model reference seems to be the version of the lens. The Helios 44M was made in 8 different versions, numbered from 44M to 44M-7. The only variations between the different versions seem to be related to the finish, mechanics or coating of the lens. All the different versions seem to be optically identical.
There were also many different Helios-44 models, differing by their mount or aperture actuation mechanism. The letter "M" at the end of the designation (Helios-44M) indicates an automatic diaphragm actuation, "I" or "7" denotes a special bayonet for Zenit-7 cameras, "D" is for Zenit-D auto lens, "K" stands for Pentax K bayonet...
There seem to be dozens of different Helios-44 lenses. Maybe there are collectors specialized in this lens only
Cheers,
Abbazz _________________ Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hacksawbob
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 1293 Location: LANCS UK
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
hacksawbob wrote:
thanks collecting these would be a nice cheap hobby! _________________ LENS LIST |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
There are also differences in the resolving power, the later lenses being more resolving than the older ones. The Helios-44-7 has significantly higher resolving power than the original Helios-44.
Obviously, this does not make it by itself a better lens necessarily. For instance, bad Helios copies are more frequent in the later versions than in the early ones.
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 11:38 am Post subject: Re: what are the different helios 44 versions |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Abbazz wrote: |
hacksawbob wrote: |
I ahve seen 44-2 44-4 and now a 44-6. Are they optically the same? |
If I understand correctly Jean-Loup Princelle's book, the number after the model reference seems to be the version of the lens. The Helios 44M was made in 8 different versions, numbered from 44M to 44M-7. The only variations between the different versions seem to be related to the finish, mechanics or coating of the lens. All the different versions seem to be optically identical.
There were also many different Helios-44 models, differing by their mount or aperture actuation mechanism. The letter "M" at the end of the designation (Helios-44M) indicates an automatic diaphragm actuation, "I" or "7" denotes a special bayonet for Zenit-7 cameras, "D" is for Zenit-D auto lens, "K" stands for Pentax K bayonet...
There seem to be dozens of different Helios-44 lenses. Maybe there are collectors specialized in this lens only
Cheers,
Abbazz |
Michael is our expert on Helios 44s
I may be wrong, but I've got a feeling the different numbers might refer to the factories where they were made. I've seen a 44M-6, I think made by Zavod Arsenal, which has a completely different style barrel to my 44M-4 made by Valdai. My 44M nothing was made by KMZ and the 44-2 by MMZ. You can work out the factory by looking up the logo on the lens on this site (or if you understand Russian, this site is more complete).
edit: P.S. The original Helios 44 was the M39 version for early Zenit SLRs (and others). The 44-2 was the M42 version, both of which are the old pre-set design. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:11 pm Post subject: Re: what are the different helios 44 versions |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
I may be wrong, but I've got a feeling the different numbers might refer to the factories where they were made. [...] and the 44-2 by MMZ. |
I guess that is not true, as I have a Valda? made Helios-44-2 lens (see my avatar or here).
According the J.-L. Princelle 2nd edition book, KMZ is the main maker of Helios lens (including H-44-2), there is also a H-44-2 made by MMZ BelOMO as yours, among another (he has not listed the Valda? version). _________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Maxim
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 284 Location: Poland 52°N 17°E
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maxim wrote:
I agree with Orio. My friend has 44M-2 version with 8 aperture blades and 44M-6 version with 6 aperture blades. The second lens is sharper, but I can't say that older version is bad. I also have MC Helios 44M-6 - I'm lucky, my copy isn't a lemon Good sharpness, contrast and colours, but poor work against sunlight (typical for this lens). Look at my sample (F/5.6; E-300; ISO 400; 1/80, hand-held):
100% crop, without any post-processing (only converted from RAW):
_________________ Regards,
Hubert
E-300 + ZD 14-42 + Tessar 5cm/3.5 + Mamiya 55/1.4 + Primoplan V 58/1.9 + Biotar 5.8cm/2 + MC Helios 44M-6 58/2 + Trioplan 100/2.8 + Trioplan V 100/2.8 + "Olympia" Sonnar 180/2.8 + ЮПИТЕР-6 180/2.8 + Telemegor 400/5.5
www.galeria.kw.pl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 12:42 pm Post subject: Re: what are the different helios 44 versions |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Flor27 wrote: |
peterqd wrote: |
I may be wrong, but I've got a feeling the different numbers might refer to the factories where they were made. [...] and the 44-2 by MMZ. |
I guess that is not true, as I have a Valda? made Helios-44-2 lens (see my avatar or here).
|
OK, that's that theory out of the window then! But maybe it still could be true of the later 44M- lenses. Michael knows I'm sure.
My 44-2 is probably an early model as it has the bright shiny fluted sections on the focus ring, like a "Zebra" lens abd the diaphragm has 8 blades. The serial number is N9038768, but it is certainly older than 1990, and it's definitely MMZ. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Maxim
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 284 Location: Poland 52°N 17°E
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maxim wrote:
My Helios has this logo: but I've seen these lenses with other logos. BTW is anybody who can tell something about years of production Helios 44 versions? _________________ Regards,
Hubert
E-300 + ZD 14-42 + Tessar 5cm/3.5 + Mamiya 55/1.4 + Primoplan V 58/1.9 + Biotar 5.8cm/2 + MC Helios 44M-6 58/2 + Trioplan 100/2.8 + Trioplan V 100/2.8 + "Olympia" Sonnar 180/2.8 + ЮПИТЕР-6 180/2.8 + Telemegor 400/5.5
www.galeria.kw.pl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Maxim wrote: |
My Helios has this logo: but I've seen these lenses with other logos. BTW is anybody who can tell something about years of production Helios 44 versions? |
This is Valdai logo.
As far as I know the only person who can give complete information on Helioses is Michael - but he does not seem to follow much the forum anymore
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
Maxim wrote: |
My Helios has this logo: but I've seen these lenses with other logos. BTW is anybody who can tell something about years of production Helios 44 versions? |
As Orio said, it's a Valda?, same as mine
J.-L Princelle said in its book that H-44-2 "The Classic" in black finish was producted from 1955 to 1978 by KMZ, MMZ BelOMO and Valda?. _________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:29 pm Post subject: Re: what are the different helios 44 versions |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
OK, that's that theory out of the window then! But maybe it still could be true of the later 44M- lenses. |
No, that's not true either. I just found a pictures of an M-5 and an M-6, both made by Valdai like my M-4. Forget what I said - this is getting too complicated!
Hi Hubert. Yes, that's the Valdai logo too. What version of the lens do you have? USSR lenses made within a certain range of dates have the year as the first two digits of the serial number. For instance the serial of my 44M-4 is 86023346 so it was made in 1986. There's a thread here somewhere with much more information about this, I'm trying to find it. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Flor, this site http://tinyurl.com/2kjz82 has pictures of the Helios 44, 44-2 and later 44Ms. The top picture of the Zenit 3M camera with M39 mount, shows a Helios 44 lens with the bright fluting I described. My lens looks like this, but mine is a 44-2 with M42 thread. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Maxim
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 284 Location: Poland 52°N 17°E
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 2:22 pm Post subject: Re: what are the different helios 44 versions |
|
|
Maxim wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
Hi Hubert. Yes, that's the Valdai logo too. What version of the lens do you have? |
Thanks for your advice, it was very helpful for me! My Helios 44M-6 probably was made in 1991 (SN 91316987). So... it's my newest lens (I haven't any AF lenses for my E-300). I'm very interested when were made my other lenses _________________ Regards,
Hubert
E-300 + ZD 14-42 + Tessar 5cm/3.5 + Mamiya 55/1.4 + Primoplan V 58/1.9 + Biotar 5.8cm/2 + MC Helios 44M-6 58/2 + Trioplan 100/2.8 + Trioplan V 100/2.8 + "Olympia" Sonnar 180/2.8 + ЮПИТЕР-6 180/2.8 + Telemegor 400/5.5
www.galeria.kw.pl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
Flor, this site http://tinyurl.com/2kjz82 has pictures of the Helios 44, 44-2 and later 44Ms. The top picture of the Zenit 3M camera with M39 mount, shows a Helios 44 lens with the bright fluting I described. My lens looks like this, but mine is a 44-2 with M42 thread. |
Mine is like the second one on this site (attached to the Zenit E), serial n° 7637348. I got it with a Zenit E camera (serial n° 76207676) from its first owner. Intersting thing is that I got a Jupiter-11A along with them, serial n°767605 so I guess they were all made in 1976. _________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 4:17 pm Post subject: Re: what are the different helios 44 versions |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Abbazz wrote: |
Maybe there are collectors specialized in this lens only
Cheers,
Abbazz |
The nearest we have is Michael (Borges). Here's his lens list:
Click here _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
Nice having found it Peter,
That makes me link to this russian page :
http://www.zenit.istra.ru/archive/lenses/helios-44.html _________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Somewhere (I can't remember where) I have read that the numbers show newer versions that often have been "improved" a little, but improvement, they wrote, referred to sharpness and resolution.
So depending on your personal favours an older lens can rather be your choice than a newer one.
I can to a certain extent confirm that. My 44M-6 is a little sharper than my 44-2, but the "original" 44-2 seems to show a nicer personality as a lens. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Borges
Joined: 09 Mar 2007 Posts: 646 Location: Moers, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 2:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Borges wrote:
Sorry for my absence, but spare time is very small in the moment because we have much to do in preparating everything for Yvonne's business in photography.´I will try to describe the different versions I know:
Helios 44:
M39 ltm or slr, successor of the BTK (Biotar Krasnogorsk), manual aperture
Helios 44-2 (for example from KMZ or Valdai):
M42, nearly the same as Helios 44, manual aperture
Helios 44-2 (MMZ/Belomo-Version):
Same number but mechanical different. Rear-focusing, so there are problems with some adapters. Manual aperture
Helios 44-3 (only MMZ/Belomo):
improved version
Helios 44-3M
Again another barrel, not often seen in the wild
Helios 44-7
For Zenit 7, I've never seen it in the wild
Helios 44M
I call it the "interim version", because it has a switch for automatic/manual aperture.
Helios 44M-4
The first of the "modern" automatic only versions. Made by different manufacturers
Helios 44M5, 6, 7
Made by different manufacturers. Main difference is the resolution, see table at http://zenit.istra.ru/archive/lenses/helios-44.html
And to make even more confusion there are MC and non-MC versions of most types. And I have seen some very special ones for optical or medical instruments and infrared photography. Not to talk about the "K"-Version with K-Mount.
In a broader sense the Helios 77 is also part of this family. Here the optical scheme is used for a wider focal length (52mm instead of 58mm), possible because of the better materials and experiences. And I'm very sure that there are a many more versions to found in the wild - I have only 14 different at home
Michael _________________ list of lenses:
Helios 44 (many different versions), Jupiter-9 , Jupiter 21M, Jupiter 37AM, Mir-1W, Mir-1V, Mir-10A, Mir-47M, Zenitar Fisheye, Tair 11-2, Industar 50-2 and a few more ...
Our wedding photography blog:
http://www.yvonne-zemke.de/blog/
Websites:
http://www.yvonne-zemke.de
http://www.dearjohn.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Thanks, Michael. Great information.
I was going to write that the older 44s have manual control and the newer ones are auto lenses. I cannot use my 44M-6 at my Zenit E, only at my Zenit EM.
But you have mentioned it (and more) already! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Thanks Michael.
Borges wrote: |
Helios 44-7
For Zenit 7, I've never seen it in the wild |
http://www.photozimmermann.ch/page1/page40/page40.html - scroll down _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Super Tak
Joined: 31 Jul 2007 Posts: 103
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Super Tak wrote:
Wrong lens I think Peter, read the post again, the lens you found is:
I think this may be the correct one:
http://www.rus-camera.com/camera.php?page=zenit&camera=zenit7 _________________ Panasonic G1 | Lumix G 20mm f/1.7 ASPH | Jupiter-8 50mm f/2 | Nikkor 200mm f/4 AI
If you believe everything you read, then you had better stop reading. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Ah yes, my mistake. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Fri Nov 30, 2007 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
I always wondered how the 44-3 compared to the 44-2. A big controversy surrounds the helios line because of all the factories involved in their production. The Valdai and KMZ plants produced primarily for the export market, while the MMZ (soon transformed into Belomo) produced for the domestic. The general opinion is that the cameras/lenses with Latin (export) are of better quality than the Cyrillic (domestic).
Just the way that the communist regime ran itself is a testament to this opinion. Quantity over quality was often the running motto. However the Soviet Union still needed to present itself as a technological power, therefore the products produced for the west were to demonstrate that achievement. Therefore you have cameras for the export market like the Voskhod that was way ahead of its time.
Anyways the helios 44-3 was only produced by MMZ but the 44-2 was produced by all three. Has anyone done a comparative study between the two?
Thanks in advance
~Marc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|