View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Puplet
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 410
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:40 am Post subject: Mir 24H 35mm f2 (Nikon mount) |
|
|
Puplet wrote:
Does anyone have one of these? Mine came this morning (well, it has been almost two months since I bought a lens!). I like my Mir 1B 37mm very much so am hoping this lens will be as good or better. Anyone have any pictures to share? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
esrods
Joined: 23 Sep 2007 Posts: 148 Location: Sydney Australia
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
esrods wrote:
I have one in my to-get-list
There was a discussion not long ago.
http://forum.mflenses.com/fast-normal-lens-for-pentax-dslr-wide-for-35mm-t6890,highlight,mir+24m.html
Go to the bottom of the first page and next. _________________ Edward Hwa Suck Shin
http://www.spankwire.com/Asian-Evelyn-Lin/video165892/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Puplet
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 410
|
Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Puplet wrote:
Ah, thank you! Missed this thread... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard_D
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2378 Location: Faversham Kent UK
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Richard_D wrote:
I've got one. Performance is pretty much up there with Nikon 35/2. I posted close up comparisons of the two in lens testing a while backand theres the odd shot in the Gallery _ I think the thread was a Sunday walk around Faversham or similar. _________________ Richard
The interesting bit:
Nikkors: 20mm f2.8 AIS, 24mm f2.8 AIS, 28mm f2.8 AIS, 35mm f2 AIS, 50mm f1.4 AI, 50mm f1.48AI, 50m f2 AI,
55mm f3.5 AI'd, 105mm f4 AI, 135mm f2.8 AI'd, 135mm f3.5 AI'd, 200mm f4 AI'd .
Nikon E Series: 100mm f2.8 .
Soviet Nikon Mount: Zenitar 16mm f2.8, Arsat/arax/photex 85mm T&S f2.8 .
Other: Asahi Super Takumar 55 mm f2 (M42) ,Tamron 300mm f5.6 SP, Tamron 500mm f8 SP.
DSLR: Nikon D700. 35mm SLRsNikon FE, Pentax S1a.
TLR: Rolliecord II.
Sub-Minature: Pentax Auto 110, 18mm f2.8, 24mm f2.8, 50mm f2.8.
More to come... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Richard_D
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2378 Location: Faversham Kent UK
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 4:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Richard_D wrote:
Oh and if a tiny desaturated 1600 ISO picture is any help look to your left... _________________ Richard
The interesting bit:
Nikkors: 20mm f2.8 AIS, 24mm f2.8 AIS, 28mm f2.8 AIS, 35mm f2 AIS, 50mm f1.4 AI, 50mm f1.48AI, 50m f2 AI,
55mm f3.5 AI'd, 105mm f4 AI, 135mm f2.8 AI'd, 135mm f3.5 AI'd, 200mm f4 AI'd .
Nikon E Series: 100mm f2.8 .
Soviet Nikon Mount: Zenitar 16mm f2.8, Arsat/arax/photex 85mm T&S f2.8 .
Other: Asahi Super Takumar 55 mm f2 (M42) ,Tamron 300mm f5.6 SP, Tamron 500mm f8 SP.
DSLR: Nikon D700. 35mm SLRsNikon FE, Pentax S1a.
TLR: Rolliecord II.
Sub-Minature: Pentax Auto 110, 18mm f2.8, 24mm f2.8, 50mm f2.8.
More to come... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pressureworld
Joined: 24 Feb 2008 Posts: 64 Location: Atlanta, GA
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 6:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
pressureworld wrote:
This lens is pretty hard to find in the M42 mount. Can this lens be used with a nikon to EOS adapter I shoot Canon and was thinking about pickng up this lens _________________ 5D, Canon XTI, Elan, Pentacon 135 (Preset), Vivitar TX 135/2.5, Jupiter 2/85, Helios 44-2 2/58
http://www.modelmayhem.com/1170971 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
pressureworld wrote: |
This lens is pretty hard to find in the M42 mount. Can this lens be used with a nikon to EOS adapter I shoot Canon and was thinking about pickng up this lens |
Certainly Orio uses a 24H on his Canons _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Puplet
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 410
|
Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 9:39 am Post subject: I love this lens! |
|
|
Puplet wrote:
Got a chance to try my new Mir 24H last week. It has instantly become one of my favourite lenses. Great black and white:
Lovely colours:
And, most importanty, it does cat photos just fine
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
yucel
Joined: 02 Jun 2008 Posts: 27 Location: Turkey
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yucel wrote:
My wife gave this lens as a present to me.
The results are stunning. Low light capabilites are suberb. It even focuses close enough for general macro work. Last weekend it was the only lens I brought with me and I never missed my zoom lens.
All I wanted was a a normal lens with a wide aperture for my DSLR but current picks like sigma 30mm f1.4 is not what I wanted. 35mm is okay for 50mm prime lens equvalent on DSLR and f2 is more than enough for me.
After It is given to me I immediately modified it with cpu from an old 50mm f1.8 AF Nikkor and now it works flawlessly on my D70s with -2 exposure compensation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
voe
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Posts: 138 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voe wrote:
Can someone tell what is the difference between Mir-24H and Mir-24M?
Is it much better than Mir-37B (the latest version)? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
voe wrote: |
Can someone tell what is the difference between Mir-24H and Mir-24M? |
MIR-24N is Nikon mount and made in Arsenal factory
MIR-24M is M42 mount and made in LZOS factory
voe wrote: |
Is it much better than Mir-37B (the latest version)? |
MIR-37B?
Do you mean the MIR-1 or MIR-1B perhaps?
if so
Yes, it's faster and it's better under all respects in my opinion.
(It is also multicoated while the MIR-1 and MIR-1B are not)
If instead you mean the MIR-36B, I don't think that the lenses are comparable. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
voe
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Posts: 138 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voe wrote:
Orio wrote: |
voe wrote: |
Can someone tell what is the difference between Mir-24H and Mir-24M? |
MIR-24N is Nikon mount and made in Arsenal factory
MIR-24M is M42 mount and made in LZOS factory
voe wrote: |
Is it much better than Mir-37B (the latest version)? |
MIR-37B?
Do you mean the MIR-1 or MIR-1B perhaps?
if so
Yes, it's faster and it's better under all respects in my opinion.
(It is also multicoated while the MIR-1 and MIR-1B are not)
If instead you mean the MIR-36B, I don't think that the lenses are comparable. |
Yes, actually I meant Mir-1B which is a 37mm f/2.8.
I am dissapointed by this lens, at least my copy resolve details pretty badly. The build quality looks very good though. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
Mir-1 on EOS 5D, stoped down @ f:8 ? (don't remember) :
http://flor27.free.fr/forums/mir_1/IMG_6023_.JPG
Other samples here : http://flor27.free.fr/forums/mir_1/
Is my copy better than yours ? _________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
voe
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Posts: 138 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
voe wrote:
I looked through all the samples. Your copy is so much better. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Puplet
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 410
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Puplet wrote:
I have a 1B too - flares easily, but it's sharp enough for me:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
Russian colors ! _________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
voe wrote: |
Can someone tell what is the difference between Mir-24H and Mir-24M?
Is it much better than Mir-1B (the latest version)? |
I prefer using the 24M over the 1B but I wouldn't say it is MUCH better. It has a slightly better resolution than the 1B IMO, it focusses much more closely and it sharpens up at a wider aperture. On an M42 camera the 24M has the auto diaphragm with pin and A-M switch, but on any other camera it becomes a stop-down lens and I much prefer using the 1B with its preset aperture, especially on the Canon DSLR.
I've heard of several 1Bs with poor IQ like yours. Maybe there was poor quality control in the factory, or maybe someone dismantled it and didn't centre an element properly/put one back the wrong way round. Does it look as though it's been opened? _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Tue Jun 03, 2008 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
I've heard of several 1Bs with poor IQ like yours. |
In my opinion, the MIR-1 (earlier version, aluminium finish) is better quality than the MIR-1V. Probably a matter of materials and of building care.
I have had two copies of MIR-1, I sold one to Andy, and I am keeping the other. Both are better than the one MIR-1V I have. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
voe
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Posts: 138 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 4:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
voe wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
voe wrote: |
Can someone tell what is the difference between Mir-24H and Mir-24M?
Is it much better than Mir-1B (the latest version)? |
I prefer using the 24M over the 1B but I wouldn't say it is MUCH better. It has a slightly better resolution than the 1B IMO, it focusses much more closely and it sharpens up at a wider aperture. On an M42 camera the 24M has the auto diaphragm with pin and A-M switch, but on any other camera it becomes a stop-down lens and I much prefer using the 1B with its preset aperture, especially on the Canon DSLR.
I've heard of several 1Bs with poor IQ like yours. Maybe there was poor quality control in the factory, or maybe someone dismantled it and didn't centre an element properly/put one back the wrong way round. Does it look as though it's been opened? |
No the lens looks like new the glass is perfectly clear the barrel is in new condition.
Maybe the old Mir-1 was made in a different factory than the new Mir-1V. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
voe wrote: |
No the lens looks like new the glass is perfectly clear the barrel is in new condition.
Maybe the old Mir-1 was made in a different factory than the new Mir-1V. |
It's not only a matter of the factory but also a matter of quality of the materials and quality of the build.
Generally, with the decades, the Eastern European production (Soviet, but also that of Carl Zeiss Jena) became less and less good because of economical difficulties. Of course it is not like that for all lenses and in all cases, but it was a general trend. Of course things like multi-coating made some of the newer lenses better, but if you compare the solidity and materials of the barrel in a 50s Jena or Soviet lens, with that of a lens made in the Seventies or Eighties, you can easily see that the later lenses have poorer build. Same for the quality of mechanical parts such as the aperture blades or ring. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
voe wrote: |
Maybe the old Mir-1 was made in a different factory than the new Mir-1V. |
As far as I can judge, both versions were made by several factories. My lens is marked MИP-1B N87005431 and has the older "bow and arrow" logo of the Vologda factory. I've also seen them with the ZOMZ logo from Zagorsk, and an automatic version made by Zavod Arsenal at Kiev. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
voe
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Posts: 138 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 12:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voe wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
voe wrote: |
Maybe the old Mir-1 was made in a different factory than the new Mir-1V. |
As far as I can judge, both versions were made by several factories. My lens is marked MИP-1B N87005431 and has the older "bow and arrow" logo of the Vologda factory. I've also seen them with the ZOMZ logo from Zagorsk, and an automatic version made by Zavod Arsenal at Kiev. |
I found a web site listing the logos of all the soviet cameras and I found that mine is made by Vologda.
This is the web site:
http://cameras.alfredklomp.com/logos/
The bottom logo is the one on my lens:
Yesterday on eBay I won this one for $20USD:
According to the above mentioned web site it is made by ZOMZ.
Before I sell any of them I will do some tests to see how they compare and will post the results here. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2008 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Wow, that looks nice, and a nice price too. This is the M39 version I think, it's likely to be a lot better than the black M42 from what I've heard. Well done. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Puplet
Joined: 09 Aug 2007 Posts: 410
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 8:45 am Post subject: More Mir cat loveliness |
|
|
Puplet wrote:
One month later, and this has become my favourite lens, nice in colour:
But, I think, even better in black and white:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Flor27
Joined: 13 Sep 2007 Posts: 1195 Location: Paris, France
|
Posted: Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Flor27 wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
As far as I can judge, both versions were made by several factories. My lens is marked MИP-1B N87005431 and has the older "bow and arrow" logo of the Vologda factory. I've also seen them with the ZOMZ logo from Zagorsk, and an automatic version made by Zavod Arsenal at Kiev. |
Your lens is younger than my Mir-1 which is from 72' from ZOMZ factory :
http://www.trypode.net/photos/bievres/mir-1_on_5d.jpg _________________ Switching from M42 to Minolta MD & Contax/Yashica |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|