View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
shadows
Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 122 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:07 am Post subject: 135mm lens |
|
|
shadows wrote:
I'm looking to get a 135mm lens, right now I am looking at either a Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm 3.5 or an Olympus Om 135mm 3.5.
Unless you guys have better/sharper lenses to suggest.
I want keep it at under a 100$ and with m42 or om mounts.
I have a question regarding the Carl Zeiss Jena, Ive seen multiple versions of the same one.
MC S
Sonnar
electric
Is there any difference between them? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57852 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 1:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
All Sonnars are good no much difference , Olympus also fine lens.
In fact 50mm and 135mm range lenses are all good at least some of them superb , but hard to find any bad one.
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/zeiss/sonnar/
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/japenese/Olympus_Om/Olympus_zuiko_135mm_f3_5/ _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Attila got there first - agree with his point
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
winmazing
Joined: 14 Mar 2009 Posts: 32 Location: Vancouver
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 6:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
winmazing wrote:
What about a pentax SMC takumar 135mm f/3.5? _________________ Canon EOS 5D MK II | EOS M
AF: Canon EF 24-104mm f/4L IS, Canon EF 70-200mm F/4L IS, Canon 50mm f/1.4, Canon 1.4x EF Extender II
MF: Mir-24H 35mm f/2.0, Pentax Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
zewrak
Joined: 12 Apr 2008 Posts: 1212
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
zewrak wrote:
winmazing wrote: |
What about a pentax SMC takumar 135mm f/3.5? |
Lovely lens. _________________ My homepage, all manual shots |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yalcinaydin
Joined: 20 May 2008 Posts: 825 Location: Izmir, Turkey
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
yalcinaydin wrote:
One of the bad exceptions is "Underground 2.8/135" _________________ My name is "Yalcin", and exactly "Yalçın" and here you can find my MF samples:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/yalcinaydin/sets/
Right now switching back to AF because of work needs but I still love the MF lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Poolhall
Joined: 25 Feb 2008 Posts: 1296
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Poolhall wrote:
Jupiter 37A or AM, very good and not as yet too expensive, very sharp lenses well worth trying |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 7:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Take the Jupiter-37 AM (135mm f/3.5), it has the same image quality than the CZJ Sonnar (for me, even a little better), and costs a lot less: normal price of CZJ is around 100 Euros, the price of Jupiter is typically around the 25-25 Euros (sometimes more, sometimes less). _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gus Helios
Joined: 10 Feb 2009 Posts: 144 Location: Cali
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:04 am Post subject: I want to suggest the Tair 11a |
|
|
Gus Helios wrote:
I have just started using a Tair 135 2.8 that I really like. Has spent a lot of time on the camera lately.
I also have a m42 Vivitar 135 2.8 and a Pentax M-135 3.5.
I really like the 2.8 versions for the oof area, but the M-135 3.5 is also a very nice lens.
As Attila said, it is hard to go wrong at this focal length. _________________ Nothing a shot a jack and some George Jones can't fix - Gus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
For what it's worth, here's another recommendation for the Jupiter-37A.
I actually sold my pristine, boxed Sonnar 135 because of the similarities between it and the Jupiter-37A - okay, perhaps not the wisest move from a 'perhaps it'll increase even more in value' perspective, but I still feel that the Jupiters can be every bit as sharp and quirky when required.
I've got 1980 and 1982 copies and a 1990 MC version, and they're all very good - the Jupiter-11A 4/135 is another one worth considering for similar (or less) money. _________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Take the Jupiter-37 AM (135mm f/3.5), it has the same image quality than the CZJ Sonnar (for me, even a little better), and costs a lot less: normal price of CZJ is around 100 Euros, the price of Jupiter is typically around the 25-25 Euros (sometimes more, sometimes less). |
There is also quality variation between samples. I have two MC Jupiter-37, one older and beaten up, and one brand-new, manufactured in 2005. Guess what? The old one is tack sharp, the new one... well, I guess there's something wrong with it.
On the other hand, I have two Takumar 135/3.5, one S-M-C and one Super. Both offer exactly the same sharpness and overall quality. I do prefer rendering of the older Super-Tak though (supposingly, it's a Type-I design with one extra lens inside).
So my advice would be getting a Super Takumar 135/3.5 (Type I has either nothing or 43540 engraved on the bottom of A/M switch, Type II with one lens less is always 43541. You can check or ask for that info before buying; http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/37316-super-taks-vs-s-m-c-taks.html post #8 ). They go for less than S-M-C versions by the way. _________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djmike
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
I pick Sonnar MC version. But the price seems over $100. Jupiter-37 can be the 2nd option with about half price. _________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olivier
Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5076 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
And what about the Pentacon 135mm f2.8 ?
I got one for cheap and it seems really good to me, but i'm far from being an expert. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Olivier wrote: |
And what about the Pentacon 135mm f2.8 ?
I got one for cheap and it seems really good to me, but i'm far from being an expert. |
It's one of Attila's preferred lenses.
It has a fantastic bokeh. It's not as sharp as the Jena, Tak, Jupiter et c.
So I guess it depends on the use. If one plans to shoot mostrly portraits that could be the lens. For other type of shots however there are sharper lenses in the same price range. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
I would also recommend Jupiter 37A / A - MC / AM - MC. I think it would be very hard to find anything sharper with round iris even for double (or even higher) price.
TAIR-11A is also very nice lens, it has very strong character and very specific bokeh. But Jupiter is a bit sharper at f/3.5-4. Mentioned Pentacon (pre-set) is also great for the price, bokeh and sharpness are fine too, but Jupiter is also a bit sharper at f/3.5-f/4. Pentacon has very nice color rendition, maybe even a bit better than Jupiter and TAIR.
I haven't much experience with 135mm Takumars. I had one copy of S-M-C 135/3.5 and the lens wasn't as sharp as i expected and purple-fringes were quite noticeable. Maybe bad or badly serviced copy.
Jupiter-11 and 11A 135/4 are also great lenses. Performance is almost identical to Jupiter-37 series. Optical design is similar. 11A version should be slightly sharper, but even the old silver 11 version is sharper than majority of f/2.8 135mm lenses.
You can also think of Triplan 100/2.8. This lens is not sharp wide opened, but you can use it in very creative way. Wide opened = soft focus lens, stopped down = sharp lens good even for macro shots, wide opened = crazy bokeh full of rings (if OOF lights are present), stopped down = nice smooth bokeh with specific character.
And don't forget the Zeiss MC Sonnar 135/3.5 - it's the same optical design as Jupiter-37, but it has more scratch-resistant coating, so it's easy to find a copy free of scratches or cleaning marks. Apertutre is hexagonal and price is higher. _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
There are many very good 135mm lenses out there.
Today, I have missed a chance to get a C/Y Zeiss Sonnar 2.8/135 for about €90,-! Oh no! _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hk300
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1041 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 11:41 am Post subject: Re: 135mm lens |
|
|
hk300 wrote:
shadows wrote: |
I'm looking to get a 135mm lens, right now I am looking at either a Carl Zeiss Jena 135mm 3.5 or an Olympus Om 135mm 3.5.
Unless you guys have better/sharper lenses to suggest.
I want keep it at under a 100$ and with m42 or om mounts.
|
where are you located?
please update your profile.
there are a lot of 135mm lenses available and some are really cheap (but not really bad).
For these really cheap lenses, perhaps postage is even more expensive than the lens itself! _________________ No longer member , please don't try to contact to him |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadows
Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 122 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shadows wrote:
Alright thanks guys for the suggestions.
Looking at a few Jupiters 37A right now. Is there much difference between A, MC JUPITER-37A-H-30 and Olympic versions? Other than the price.
I'm also very interested in the Trioplan but they are going for 400$ on ebay :S.
Updated my profile. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57852 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
shadows wrote: |
Alright thanks guys for the suggestions.
Looking at a few Jupiters 37A right now. Is there much difference between A, MC JUPITER-37A-H-30 and Olympic versions? Other than the price.
I'm also very interested in the Trioplan but they are going for 400$ on ebay :S.
Updated my profile. |
Trioplan for 400 USD that is scam I think can you show us the link.
MC Jupiter has better contrast. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadows
Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 122 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shadows wrote:
Quote: |
Trioplan for 400 USD that is scam I think can you show us the link.
MC Jupiter has better contrast. |
Click here to see on Ebay
Click here to see on Ebay |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57852 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2009 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Ah forget these...
Well known seller from high prices.
Follow this. Seller is excellent and I expect around 100 USD or less end price.
Click here to see on Ebay _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadows
Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 122 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 12:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
shadows wrote:
Ok thank you Attila |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shadows
Joined: 17 Feb 2009 Posts: 122 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 2:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shadows wrote:
Well I did it and bought an MC JUPITER-37A-H-30 , thank you guys for suggesting it.
Now to get my hands on a trioplan 100mm, I'm sure that some of you guys are tired of using it, you could sell it or better yet give it to me |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
shadows wrote: |
Well I did it and bought an MC JUPITER-37A-H-30 , thank you guys for suggesting it.
Now to get my hands on a trioplan 100mm, I'm sure that some of you guys are tired of using it, you could sell it or better yet give it to me |
Congratulations on your Jupiter - you should not be disappointed with it
And sure, I'll send you my Trioplan - I only have it a week and it's got me in tears already...tears of absolute glee and eternal joy _________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gus Helios
Joined: 10 Feb 2009 Posts: 144 Location: Cali
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:34 pm Post subject: I look forward to your thoughts and photos |
|
|
Gus Helios wrote:
shadows wrote: |
Well I did it and bought an MC JUPITER-37A-H-30 , thank you guys for suggesting it.
Now to get my hands on a trioplan 100mm, I'm sure that some of you guys are tired of using it, you could sell it or better yet give it to me |
Congrats... I have been wanting to try the Jupiter 37A for a while. Can't wait to see how you do with it. I only have (4) 135 lenses, so I am sure I need this one too... haha
But like Mal, I do not think I will be sending you my Trioplan 100 anytime soon. _________________ Nothing a shot a jack and some George Jones can't fix - Gus |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|