| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
erkie
Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Location: Missouri
|
 Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:53 pm Post subject: Uncommon focal length. Super Takumar 150 f4 |
 |
|
erkie wrote:
Ok so I wasn't looking for this lens. It was in a camera bag with a Spotmatic SP100 and an SMC Tak 50/1.4 that I picked up for $40. So I threw it on my little Pentax Kx just to see what to expect. Needless to say I am both surprised and pleased. A good deal of my older non multicoated lenses suffer in the contrast department, Not so with this little oddity.
These shots are all wide open. The first two are jpg's from the camera. The first shot was adjusted in levels only to brighten it very slightly. No curves or sharpening because I wanted to show what the contrast is like with the camera settings zeroed out. The second shot is straight from camera again settings zeroed out.
The final shot has been sharpened very heavily( well at least heavily for my taste) Just to show that images with this lens will stand up to some aggressive sharpening.
Obviously these are both backlit shots without much contrast loss or any noticeable flair. This was my biggest suprise along with the fact that I quite like this focul length on the crop sensor dslr. I am hoping I like it on my film cameras too.
Eric
#1
#2
#3
_________________
I shoot film and meter with digital 
Asahi H3v, Praktica FX3, Retina IIa, Spotmatic sp1000, Fujica V2, Yashica lynx5000, Pentax Sf1, Minolta SRT102, Minolta7000i, Pentax MX, Pentax ME, Pentax Kx
lensesM42- Isco Gottingen Westanar 50/2.8, Isco Gottingen Westron 35/2.8, Rikenon 35/2.8, Spiratone Tc 105/2.5, Spiratone Tc 200/4.5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 300/5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 135/3.5, Auto Tak 35/3.5, Super Tak 150/4, S-M-C Tak 50/1.4, S-M-C Tak 28/3.5, SMC Tak 55/2, Mamya Sekor 55/1.8
K- mount- Helios 44-K-4, Jc penny 28/2.8, Da 18-55, Da 55-300, Pentax F 35-70, SMCP M 50/1.4, SMCP M 50/1.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Third one looks quite contrasty but the other two look quite flat on my screen so I wouldn't say it's all that contrasty. Nice rendering though.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
erkie
Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Location: Missouri
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
erkie wrote:
| iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
| Third one looks quite contrasty but the other two look quite flat on my screen so I wouldn't say it's all that contrasty. Nice rendering though. |
I suppose this amount of contrast is a relative thing for me. I don't have another 150mm lens to compare it to but comparing it to any of my old single coated 135mm lenses ( Meyer, Isco, Sears.....) Shooting into the light like this would bring quite different results.
Eric
_________________
I shoot film and meter with digital
Asahi H3v, Praktica FX3, Retina IIa, Spotmatic sp1000, Fujica V2, Yashica lynx5000, Pentax Sf1, Minolta SRT102, Minolta7000i, Pentax MX, Pentax ME, Pentax Kx
lensesM42- Isco Gottingen Westanar 50/2.8, Isco Gottingen Westron 35/2.8, Rikenon 35/2.8, Spiratone Tc 105/2.5, Spiratone Tc 200/4.5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 300/5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 135/3.5, Auto Tak 35/3.5, Super Tak 150/4, S-M-C Tak 50/1.4, S-M-C Tak 28/3.5, SMC Tak 55/2, Mamya Sekor 55/1.8
K- mount- Helios 44-K-4, Jc penny 28/2.8, Da 18-55, Da 55-300, Pentax F 35-70, SMCP M 50/1.4, SMCP M 50/1.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3705
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 6:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
You nailed my taste by showing unprocessed images. But i say second is shaky thus not optimally sharp.
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
It has the typical rendering of a portrait lens. Smooth colors, medium contrast.
Something long focal distance, too much far from the subject?
Why 150 mm? Pentax said anything about this?
Anyway, nice lens.
Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
erkie
Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Location: Missouri
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
erkie wrote:
| Pancolart wrote: |
| You nailed my taste by showing unprocessed images. But i say second is shaky thus not optimally sharp. |
You are quite likely correct about it being shaky. I don't often use anything over 105mm handheld. It's hard for me to determine if a lens has qualities I like on film unless I see shots posted without a great deal of post processing work .
| Quote: |
| Why 150 mm? Pentax said anything about this? |
I don't believe I have ever read anything that would explain this focul length, And I've never seen another 150mm. It would work as a portrait lens on film for me but it's pretty tight on my dslr.
One other thing I like about this lens is that it is smaller than most of my 135mm lenses. actually it's about the size of my Spiratone 105mm.
Eric
_________________
I shoot film and meter with digital
Asahi H3v, Praktica FX3, Retina IIa, Spotmatic sp1000, Fujica V2, Yashica lynx5000, Pentax Sf1, Minolta SRT102, Minolta7000i, Pentax MX, Pentax ME, Pentax Kx
lensesM42- Isco Gottingen Westanar 50/2.8, Isco Gottingen Westron 35/2.8, Rikenon 35/2.8, Spiratone Tc 105/2.5, Spiratone Tc 200/4.5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 300/5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 135/3.5, Auto Tak 35/3.5, Super Tak 150/4, S-M-C Tak 50/1.4, S-M-C Tak 28/3.5, SMC Tak 55/2, Mamya Sekor 55/1.8
K- mount- Helios 44-K-4, Jc penny 28/2.8, Da 18-55, Da 55-300, Pentax F 35-70, SMCP M 50/1.4, SMCP M 50/1.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
adent
Joined: 06 Oct 2011
Posts: 304
Location: United States
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6950
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
#3 looks a decent image. I struggle to find subjects when shooting at 135mm let alone longer; plus I don't shoot on a crop, so well done.
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 2167
Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
I can't recall another 150mm for 35mm slrs. It was never a good seller - I recall having a new one in stock for almost three years! We eventually sold it by putting it in the secondhand section and pricing it just below a new 135mm Super Takumat . . .
Somebody at Asahi must have a good reason for creating it, but it seemed to me to combine the "weaker" points of both the 135 and 200 lenses without giving anything that was distinctive or significantly better than either of them.
_________________
Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
The two teles more sold were the 135 and the 200, almost sure. Perhaps the idea that the point between (150 mm lens) should be a good business.
And with the 50 mm lens, the 150 should complete an amateur kit (with a wide angle). I think that Pentax had think anythig like that.
But the theory is only that, the reality win.
Rino
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009
Posts: 2167
Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
Rino - yes, that theory would indeed make sense taking into account that Pentax owners got a 55mm as standard and usually bought a 35mm as their first wideangle in the mid to late 1960s. The "logical outfit" could have been sold as 35 - 55 - 150mm. But I think the 150 was more expensive than the 135 and all the textbooks banged on about the 135 being the "normal" telephoto. As you say, the reality will always win.
_________________
Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hoanpham
Joined: 31 Jan 2011
Posts: 2575
Expire: 2015-01-18
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
hoanpham wrote:
I have the Pentax M 150/3.5, smaller than the Takumar. Very sharp. Agree it's an uncommon focal, but still a joy to use.
Last edited by hoanpham on Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:08 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008
Posts: 3754
Location: Argentina
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
The 120 may be the option when you have the 50 mm and the 135 should be so longer for you. Between the 100 and the 135, the 120 had found his own place. One more toime, the theory is only that.
Rino.
_________________
Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
The first photo shows very promising detail wide open. What about a few photos slightly stopped down?
The third photo has horrible sharpening halos, I don't think it proves anything except that too much sharpening ruins images  .
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
erkie
Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Location: Missouri
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
erkie wrote:
Thank you everyone for your comments and replies !
I've reread my post and see that I didn't mention that the third shot is just an over sharpened version of the second shot. Sorry for omitting that info.
I was unaware that there was an M version of this lens as well. If it is smaller than the Tak it's pretty compact indeed. I too have sought the SMC M 120 but haven't had much luck.
Orio,
I agree totally with you on the ability of over sharpening ruining an image I will try to take some photos with this lens stopped down a bit, If I can catch some Shots between rain showers I am also hoping to get some images with this lens on my Pentax MX or H3v and will post some results of this lens on film. I am hoping that it will perform pretty well
Thank you folks again.
Eric
_________________
I shoot film and meter with digital
Asahi H3v, Praktica FX3, Retina IIa, Spotmatic sp1000, Fujica V2, Yashica lynx5000, Pentax Sf1, Minolta SRT102, Minolta7000i, Pentax MX, Pentax ME, Pentax Kx
lensesM42- Isco Gottingen Westanar 50/2.8, Isco Gottingen Westron 35/2.8, Rikenon 35/2.8, Spiratone Tc 105/2.5, Spiratone Tc 200/4.5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 300/5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 135/3.5, Auto Tak 35/3.5, Super Tak 150/4, S-M-C Tak 50/1.4, S-M-C Tak 28/3.5, SMC Tak 55/2, Mamya Sekor 55/1.8
K- mount- Helios 44-K-4, Jc penny 28/2.8, Da 18-55, Da 55-300, Pentax F 35-70, SMCP M 50/1.4, SMCP M 50/1.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010
Posts: 4060
Location: Charleston
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
| scsambrook wrote: |
| I can't recall another 150mm for 35mm slrs. |
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1136361.html#1136361
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
dfujevec
Joined: 27 Nov 2009
Posts: 43
Location: Slovenia
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 5:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
dfujevec wrote:
Because I have quite a few different tele Takumars at home I can write a bit more about 150mm and why it is different from the rest. Takumar 120 mm is primarily intended for portrait photography. It works best up to 10m, at the infinite is not one of the best lenses. Wide open it has very nice bokeh. 135mm lenses are a kind of compromise, they are good all-round lenses. Takumar 150mm is more telephoto lens for objects that are close to infinte. In that range it is more sharp than 120mm and 135mm lenses, but it doesn't have plesant bokeh and has a lot of longitudinal CA.
_________________
Pentax K20D + eos 5DmkII + 15kg of Takumar lenses
http://dfujevec.deviantart.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
erkie
Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Location: Missouri
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 4:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
erkie wrote:
Wide open into the sun. Why I like Easter 
#1
#2
#3
_________________
I shoot film and meter with digital
Asahi H3v, Praktica FX3, Retina IIa, Spotmatic sp1000, Fujica V2, Yashica lynx5000, Pentax Sf1, Minolta SRT102, Minolta7000i, Pentax MX, Pentax ME, Pentax Kx
lensesM42- Isco Gottingen Westanar 50/2.8, Isco Gottingen Westron 35/2.8, Rikenon 35/2.8, Spiratone Tc 105/2.5, Spiratone Tc 200/4.5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 300/5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 135/3.5, Auto Tak 35/3.5, Super Tak 150/4, S-M-C Tak 50/1.4, S-M-C Tak 28/3.5, SMC Tak 55/2, Mamya Sekor 55/1.8
K- mount- Helios 44-K-4, Jc penny 28/2.8, Da 18-55, Da 55-300, Pentax F 35-70, SMCP M 50/1.4, SMCP M 50/1.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011
Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 7:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Nice results, shows the strength of the SMC coating. Last one is wonderful.
I'd call that bokeh very pleasant, not unusual for a longer lens.
_________________
I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Glenn72
Joined: 24 Jan 2012
Posts: 48
Location: Barcelona, Spain
|
| Posted: Sun Apr 08, 2012 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Glenn72 wrote:
The last three are very nice shots especially as mentioned the last one. Thanks for sharing.
Seems you got a really good deal on a very good older lens, congrats! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
erkie
Joined: 08 Oct 2011
Posts: 308
Location: Missouri
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 09, 2012 12:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
erkie wrote:
I've come to really like this lens . There may be some truth to the supposition that the late Super Taks may have had the early S-M-C coatings. Whichever it is this Super Tak has very good coatings compared to other lenses of this vintage that I use.
_________________
I shoot film and meter with digital
Asahi H3v, Praktica FX3, Retina IIa, Spotmatic sp1000, Fujica V2, Yashica lynx5000, Pentax Sf1, Minolta SRT102, Minolta7000i, Pentax MX, Pentax ME, Pentax Kx
lensesM42- Isco Gottingen Westanar 50/2.8, Isco Gottingen Westron 35/2.8, Rikenon 35/2.8, Spiratone Tc 105/2.5, Spiratone Tc 200/4.5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 300/5, Sankyo Kohki Komura 135/3.5, Auto Tak 35/3.5, Super Tak 150/4, S-M-C Tak 50/1.4, S-M-C Tak 28/3.5, SMC Tak 55/2, Mamya Sekor 55/1.8
K- mount- Helios 44-K-4, Jc penny 28/2.8, Da 18-55, Da 55-300, Pentax F 35-70, SMCP M 50/1.4, SMCP M 50/1.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6005
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 4:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Found this one at the markets in a bag of old lenses - all covered in dust.
This one was full of fungus - every element had spidery veins.
I had it cleaned and it is now rather good.
Here are some quick samples with image crops following.
I know - not flowers again!
Both taken wide open @f4
My standard PP from RAW in LR5 but no sharpening.
OH
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mir
Joined: 07 Feb 2011
Posts: 983
Location: Montreal, Canada
Expire: 2017-09-30
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mir wrote:
Mine is a Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4/150, it's the 2nd version made between 1971-75, 6 blades, MFD 180cm
One of our fellow member runs this wonderful web site where you'll find all you need to know on all Takumar's :
http://kajiwara.weebly.com/index.html
Straight out of the camera Jpegs, no PP...
#1 a couple of older shots...
#2
#3 Last week...
#4
#5
_________________
"Obsta principiis, finem respice"
"There is a fine line between hobby and mental illness"
MISC: Tamron SP 35-80 (01A), Auto Chinon Tomioka 1.4/55, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90, Tamron SP 5,6/300 (54B)
ZEISS: WG Distagon 2.8/25, WG Distagon 2.8/35 HFT, WG Planar HFT 1.4/50, Ultron 1.8/50, WG Sonnar 2.8/85, WG Sonnar HFT 2.8/135
VOIGTLÄNDER : Ultron Aspherical 1.8/21, Ultron 2/28, Nokton Aspherical 1.2/35, Nokton Classic 1.4/40, Nokton 1.2/50, Nokton Aspherical 1.5/50, Color-Heliar 2.5/75
MINOLTA: MD 3.5/35-70 Macro, MD 1.2/50, MC Rokkor-X 1.2/58, MD Macro 3.5/50
LEITZ: SUMMICRON-R 2/35 (II), SUMMICRON-R 2/50 (II), TELE ELMARIT-M 2,8/90 (Thin)
CANON RF: 2.8/28, 2/35, 1.2/50, 1.4/50, 1.5/50, Serenar 1.8/50, 2/85, 2/100, 3.5/100
LTM : YASHICA YASHINON 1.8/5cm, FUJINON L 2/5cm, CHIYODA KOGAKU SUPER ROKKOR 1.8/5cm, CHIYOKO SUPER ROKKOR C 2/5cm, TOKYO KOGAKU Topcor-S 2/5cm, Nippon Kogaku NIKKOR-H.C 2/5cm, KMZ Jupiter-8 2/5cm
DKL : VOIGTLÄNDER SKOPAREX 3,4/35, SEPTON 2/50, DYNAREX 3,4/90, SUPER-DYNAREX 4/135, Scheiner-Kreuznach Retina-Xenon 1,9/50
And a small Minolta AF set: 2.8/20, 1.4/35, 1.4/50, 2/100, 4.5/100-200
@we3fotography
@7plus_pictures
@_whats.that.car_ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011
Posts: 577
Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 8:43 am Post subject: also 150 2,8 |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
"scsambrook wrote:
I can't recall another 150mm for 35mm slrs.
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1136361.html#1136361
_________________
Regards,
Woodrim"
which reminds me that there is also the Kinoptik 150\2,8. The interchangeable mount version and the "auto aperture" version.
p. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tromboads
Joined: 29 May 2012
Posts: 1655
Location: Melbourne AU
Expire: 2015-10-01
|
| Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
tromboads wrote:
I concur with what has been said about the 150mm
I fell into it too because of its strange focal length. Small, light, I suppose that's Pentax to a Tea. Optically it's not an odd focal length by any stretch, just non-popular I suppose. I too confess to not having had a discrete reason where 150 was better then 138, or 200mm yet 
But The Grand Prix is coming up, maybe it will make it into my bag.
actually where is the silly thing...
That's a 105 f2.8, 150 f4 and the 138 f3.5
And actually I only notice now the 138 actually has a smaller cap on the bottom So yes. its a small dam thing.
Last edited by tromboads on Tue Feb 25, 2014 12:56 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
