Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Triotar 4/135 Vs Sonnar 4/135, what you choose?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And one more note pre-war Meyer lenses are sharp like Zeiss ... pre-war Triotar also sharper than post war.


PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

A G Photography wrote:
(...)Triotar at f4 is sharp, Trioplan is still very very soft in a dreamy way (...)

I have two copies of Trioplan.
My first copy (late 50's) gives very noticeable glow at F2.8 and is sharp stopped down to F4 - as you can see on this photo:




Older version (mid 50's) at F2.8 gives slighter glow than the first. When stopped down - isn't as sharp as first copy (but is still good).

I haven't any experience with CZJ Triotar - but at one time I'll buy it. I'm dreaming about old, chrome version made in 40's Smile


PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Old chrome available time to time on low price on Ebay I have two or three copy of them . One looks brand new, and not works at all, another has broken aperture and might be third ok Laughing


PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
I used to have both lenses, now I only have the Sonnar because it's superior in my opinion.

Some Sonnar 4/135 photos of mine:

Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 4/135 - wide open


Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 4/135 - stopped down


Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 4/135 - stopped down


Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 4/135 - slightly stopped down


Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 4/135 - stopped down


Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 4/135 - slightly stopped down


Carl Zeiss Jena Sonnar 4/135 - wide open


100% crop Wide open:




Hi Orio!

Using tripod, eh Twisted Evil

Rino.


PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

estudleon wrote:

Hi Orio!
Using tripod, eh Twisted Evil
Rino.


Sorry Rino, believe it or not, that was hand-held Cool


PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

A G Photography wrote:
The Zeiss Triotar is completely different than Meyer Trioplan.

And in the right light condition the Triotar is tack sharp and with a great 3d effect.







On a crop camera the Triotar doesn't show its greater weakness, alas the softness at the borders.


I like the first one, great 3D Very Happy


PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 7:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
estudleon wrote:

Hi Orio!
Using tripod, eh Twisted Evil
Rino.


Sorry Rino, believe it or not, that was hand-held Cool


Oh no. You have a stable arm. I wish I can as you are. Smile


PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 8:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

KhanX wrote:

Oh no. You have a stable arm. I wish I can as you are. Smile


Just luck, Khan. Smile
And... I'd trade that stability for your model anytime Laughing Wink


PostPosted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Orio wrote:
estudleon wrote:

Hi Orio!
Using tripod, eh Twisted Evil
Rino.


Sorry Rino, believe it or not, that was hand-held Cool



Forza, Orio!!! Laughing