View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4073 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2022 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
They mentioin "rare-earth" glass (usually lanthanum back then), not thorium!
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2022 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
There's a Super-Komura 100mm Prime F2.5 Nikkon NF from the seller conect2020 on ebay US, 150$ in new shape in case someone is interested.
Wonder is there's really any difference between the f1.8, f2 and f2.5 optics of komura |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7583 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Mon Apr 11, 2022 11:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
kiddo wrote: |
There's a Super-Komura 100mm Prime F2.5 Nikkon NF from the seller conect2020 on ebay US, 150$ in new shape in case someone is interested.
Wonder is there's really any difference between the f1.8, f2 and f2.5 optics of komura |
All of them are 5 elements Ernostar. Which should behave similarly.
I had a copy 105mm F2.0. Pretty good performer. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Sankyo Kohki Komura 105mm f2.5
#1
#2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
The 1.8 that i have seems no coated at all. Maybe the versions 2.0 and 2.5 have some kind of coatings? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Although slow to post in this thread, I thought I might have been one of the earliest posters of Komura lenses but I see Luis started back in 2008 while it took me until 2010 to discover them. I like the lenses, although I don't use them very much mostly due to having way too many other lenses. I like the 2.5/105 very much but will usually pick up my Nikkor P 2.5/105 instead. However, the Komura has the benefit of a more interesting iris when stopped down.
When I start wondering which lenses I like the best, I look at my usage as an indication. My Komura lenses are listed here, followed by the number of images taken with them.
4/24 (378)
2.5/105 (708)
2.8/135 (341)
3.5/135 (237)
3.5/200 (721)
I've found the 200mm to be more challenging but reasonably sharp at f/3.5 when the focus is nailed. The bokeh is the most pleasing.
#1
#2
#3
#4
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Apr 13, 2022 11:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
All 200mm lenses have pleasing bokeh if the background isn't close to the subject. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hilltime
Joined: 17 Jul 2020 Posts: 13 Location: United States
|
Posted: Fri May 20, 2022 9:28 pm Post subject: My Komura Collection |
|
|
hilltime wrote:
Just ran into this long running topic on Komura lenses. Thought I'd send a pic of my collection, all in LTM which I
have accumulated over a 15 yr period. Obviously, the rarest piece is the 36MM/F1.8 which I search for many yrs
and ever since buying one about 5 ys ago, have only ever seen two offered for sale on Ebay.
I think the very first Komura I purchased was a Mint in the box, 100MM/F2 which was a super lens but I found it
much to large to use effectively on LTM cameras. It was every bit as good as a Canon 100mm/F2 which I also bought
and sold for the same reason. The 105mm/F2.5 is much easier to handle and only ever so slightly slower.
#1
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2022 10:47 pm Post subject: Re: My Komura Collection |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
hilltime wrote: |
Just ran into this long running topic on Komura lenses. Thought I'd send a pic of my collection, all in LTM which I
have accumulated over a 15 yr period. Obviously, the rarest piece is the 36MM/F1.8 which I search for many yrs
and ever since buying one about 5 ys ago, have only ever seen two offered for sale on Ebay.
I think the very first Komura I purchased was a Mint in the box, 100MM/F2 which was a super lens but I found it
much to large to use effectively on LTM cameras. It was every bit as good as a Canon 100mm/F2 which I also bought
and sold for the same reason. The 105mm/F2.5 is much easier to handle and only ever so slightly slower.
|
Wonderful collection.
Some very rare glass among that lot.
Congratulations
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7583 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2022 2:17 am Post subject: Re: My Komura Collection |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
hilltime wrote: |
Just ran into this long running topic on Komura lenses. Thought I'd send a pic of my collection, all in LTM which I
have accumulated over a 15 yr period. Obviously, the rarest piece is the 36MM/F1.8 which I search for many yrs
and ever since buying one about 5 ys ago, have only ever seen two offered for sale on Ebay.
I think the very first Komura I purchased was a Mint in the box, 100MM/F2 which was a super lens but I found it
much to large to use effectively on LTM cameras. It was every bit as good as a Canon 100mm/F2 which I also bought
and sold for the same reason. The 105mm/F2.5 is much easier to handle and only ever so slightly slower.
#1
|
I miss the 36mm once and I never able to find one I am affordable! _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2022 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Don't know if this was posted already. From allphotolenses.com A Komura catalogue:
https://allphotolenses.com/public/files/pdfs/9c85de281eee10b265e9aa77511316ab.pdf _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sun Aug 07, 2022 10:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Thank you.
That answers the question asked elsewhere - about the weight of a particular lens - the 3.5/200 I think.
Much appreciated
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Wed Sep 07, 2022 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
135mm 1:3.5 mede in Japan
Misprint? by The lens profile, on Flickr _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cyberjunkie
Joined: 24 Mar 2010 Posts: 282 Location: Chiang Mai, Bologna, Amsterdam
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2023 5:19 pm Post subject: Other Komura lenses I just brought home |
|
|
cyberjunkie wrote:
I finally brought home some vintage lenses I had bought when I lived abroad. Some are Sankor-made (see "The Sankor lens thread") and some are Komura.
I didn't have enough room in my luggage for everything, so a few lenses were left behind. At least three were Komuras, a 135mm preset, plus a 5/300mm and a 3.5/28mm in UNI AUTO mount.
The others I could take with me are shown in this post.
First there is a very nice Sankyo Kohki Komura f=500mm 1:7, in its original leather case.
It gets separated in two parts to be stored in its case. The large sun shade slides inside the front part of the lens, saving space.
CASE
Separated lens inside the case
LENS WITHOUT SHADE
LENS WITH SHADE
Lens on Pentax K-1
Here there is a group of three preset Komura lenses [from left to right]
Sankyo Kohki Komura f=105mm 1:2.5 Sankyo Koki Komura f=105mm 1:2.8 Sankyo Kohki Komura f=135mm 1:2.8
The older 105mm with the older looking font (The "K" of Komura looks like an "X") and with KOKI without "H", weights A LOT more than the other (faster, and very likely more recent) 105mm.
I believe that the f/2.8 has a lot more glass in it, or at least a much much heavier construction. I tend to believe that both things are true.
Interestingly, the serial numbers does not seem to have any relation to the age of the lens. The serial of the older 105mm starts with "334" while the serial of the f/2.5 version starts with "333".
One interesting observation: a few Komuras with the same barrel style of the 2.5/105mm are quite wobbly, and would benefit from a good CLA. The older ones, like the 2.8/105mm, feel better built and still in very good shape (though the focusing ring tends to be a bit stiff).
The 500mm has the old version of the UNI mount, that can be easily unscrewed and has no set screw. Unfortunately my example has a Minolta bayonet, so when I tried it I had to steal an M42 UNI mount from another Komura.
The performance is not too bad for a four element of such old vintage, but the fringing is quite strong in certain pictures.
The other three lenses have a native M42 screw mount.
I thought that the 2.8/105mm was not sold in rangefinder mount, but the previous post show the same lens in Leica M39 mount. The other two lenses were also available for rangefinder cameras, in Leica and possibly Contax mount. There was also a way to use the 500mm on Leica rangefinder cameras using the attachment ring dedicated to the proprietary Komura reflex box (a kind of Visoflex copy).
Of the three M42 lenses, I properly tried only the 2.5/105mm, with very satisfying results if I remember correctly. I'm a fan of portrait lenses with smooth rendering and great bokeh, and from what I remember that lens did quite well under that point of view. In the picture it looks badly scratched but it's just the filter. It didn't have its cap so the filter took all the damage
Here are two examples of pictures taken with the Komura 500mm. There is some PP involved, but I'd say that it's not terrible at all:
WIDE OPEN
AT F/11
_________________ Pentax Bodies: 6x7, K2, MX, LX, Super A, Z-1, K-1, K-5 II, K-01, K10D, K200D
Other cameras: Leica CL, Leica M5, Rolleiflex, Mamiya Super 23, Horizont, and many bellows cameras from 4x5" to 8x10"
- Shooting only digital recently, FF and APS-C
- Collecting vintage large format lenses (plenty of them )
- Looking for Pentax-A* 200mm Macro and Pentax-A* 1.8/135mm, Sigma 150mm or 180mm Macro PK, Sigma 50-500 AF PK, Enna 1.5/85mm M42; selling Pentacon Six/Pentax 67/Mamiya Press/Leica M/Rolleiflex/4x5"/Manfrotto stuff
MY BELOVED PK, M42 LENSES
Photographica sets
On sale
Last edited by cyberjunkie on Sat May 20, 2023 6:41 pm; edited 4 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cyberjunkie
Joined: 24 Mar 2010 Posts: 282 Location: Chiang Mai, Bologna, Amsterdam
|
Posted: Thu May 18, 2023 6:54 pm Post subject: Other Komuras, preset and Auto |
|
|
cyberjunkie wrote:
I found some images of the other Komuras I will bring home the next time, plus I add two interesting images of the attachment of the UNI AUTO mount (though I don't own that lens, don't remember how I got the pics)
Sankyo Kohki Komura f=135mm 1:3.5 UNI mount (maybe I already posted this picture, I don't remember)
Sankyo Kohki Komura f=200mm 1:4.5 fixed mount
Sankyo Kohki Komura f=300mm 1:5 UNI AUTO
Sankyo Kohki Komura f=135mm 1:2.8 UNI mount (almost identical to the f/3.5 version on top)
Sankyo Kohki Komura f=200mm 1:4.5 fixed mount (other picture)
Sankyo Kohki Komura f=135mm 1:3.5 fixed mount
Here are two pictures of an f/2.5 wide angle UNI AUTO without ring, that show the attachment on the lens. Not owning this lens, I have no idea if it uses the same UNI AUTO ring I have on my 300mm and 28mm Auto Komura, or a successive version
EDIT:
I beg your pardon if I already posted different pictures of a couple of lenses included in my last two posts.
I chose not to erase the pics cause I believe it might be useful to have a different perspective of the same lens. _________________ Pentax Bodies: 6x7, K2, MX, LX, Super A, Z-1, K-1, K-5 II, K-01, K10D, K200D
Other cameras: Leica CL, Leica M5, Rolleiflex, Mamiya Super 23, Horizont, and many bellows cameras from 4x5" to 8x10"
- Shooting only digital recently, FF and APS-C
- Collecting vintage large format lenses (plenty of them )
- Looking for Pentax-A* 200mm Macro and Pentax-A* 1.8/135mm, Sigma 150mm or 180mm Macro PK, Sigma 50-500 AF PK, Enna 1.5/85mm M42; selling Pentacon Six/Pentax 67/Mamiya Press/Leica M/Rolleiflex/4x5"/Manfrotto stuff
MY BELOVED PK, M42 LENSES
Photographica sets
On sale |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrlizard
Joined: 05 Mar 2024 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:23 pm Post subject: Re: Sankyo Kohki Japan Komura 1:2.5 f=105mm |
|
|
mrlizard wrote:
This is a 105mm f2 I just picked up for an ok price and was excited to use it, not knowing anything about this brand, and foolishly assuming it was a m42 mount. Interesting to learn better on this thread!
It seems like this lens has a 44mm thread mount and am guessing is perhaps not interchangeable?
It has the 3 grubs and 4 smaller 1mm screws by them.
I was hoping to adapt it to EF or RF mount and use it for shooting some stop frame experiments. The optional declicked aperture ring was a highlight for me. Also seeing some good reviews and results.
Is there any hope for me?
Reading the posts on here has got me even more hyped up on it.
[quote="cyberjunkie"]
tb_a wrote: |
I start with the lens I got today.
The lens is a very early Sankyo Kohki Japan Komura 1:2.5 f=105mm.
I thought it was in M42 UNI mount. If I'm not mistaken there were UNI mounts with set screws, and while the majority were "silver", there were also black ones.
This lens is different, it has a kind of proprietary T2 mount, with no thread.
It is simply pushed in place, and then fixed with three set screws that engage in a ridge in the barrel of the lens.
It is the first Komura lens I have seen that has this kind of mount.
It possibly predates the interchangeable UNI mount.
As per cameraeccentric catalog, there was an almost identical version of the same lens that was sold in UNI mount.
It was the second fastest tele with the "standard" UNI. The four super-fast (and today hugely expensive) short teles had TWO different types of "special" UNI mount. Because of the size of the objectives, the mount had to be larger as well.
The "special" UNI mount had two sizes, the larger for the 1.4/85mm and 2/135mm, and the smaller for the 2/105mm and 2.3/135mm.
Strangely, from what I found online it seems that the 1.8/100mm had the standard UNI mount. I guess it was due to the design, with a back element small enough to fit the normal mount.
|
Last edited by mrlizard on Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:43 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:41 pm Post subject: Re: Sankyo Kohki Japan Komura 1:2.5 f=105mm |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
[quote="mrlizard"]This is a 105mm f2 I just picked up for an ok price and was excited to use it, not knowing anything about this brand, and foolishly assuming it was a m42 mount. Interesting to learn better on this thread!
It seems like this lens has a 44mm thread mount and am guessing is perhaps not interchangeable?
It has the 3 grubs and 4 smaller 1mm screws by them.
I was hoping to adapt it to EF or RF mount and use it for shooting some stop frame experiments. The optional declicked aperture ring was a highlight for me. Also seeing some good reviews and results.
Is there any hope for me?
Reading the posts on here has got me even more hyped up on it.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
cyberjunkie wrote: |
tb_a wrote: |
I start with the lens I got today.
The lens is a very early Sankyo Kohki Japan Komura 1:2.5 f=105mm.
I thought it was in M42 UNI mount. If I'm not mistaken there were UNI mounts with set screws, and while the majority were "silver", there were also black ones.
This lens is different, it has a kind of proprietary T2 mount, with no thread.
It is simply pushed in place, and then fixed with three set screws that engage in a ridge in the barrel of the lens.
It is the first Komura lens I have seen that has this kind of mount.
It possibly predates the interchangeable UNI mount.
As per cameraeccentric catalog, there was an almost identical version of the same lens that was sold in UNI mount.
It was the second fastest tele with the "standard" UNI. The four super-fast (and today hugely expensive) short teles had TWO different types of "special" UNI mount. Because of the size of the objectives, the mount had to be larger as well.
The "special" UNI mount had two sizes, the larger for the 1.4/85mm and 2/135mm, and the smaller for the 2/105mm and 2.3/135mm.
Strangely, from what I found online it seems that the 1.8/100mm had the standard UNI mount. I guess it was due to the design, with a back element small enough to fit the normal mount.
|
|
Your first post won't show the images, now you should be good |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
If I'm right these komura lenses share the same threaded mount, but on top of it, they would mount the specific adapter ring for many mounts, so in fact your lens might be missing the mounting ring that fits to the camera (Minolta, Nikon, m42 etc) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrlizard
Joined: 05 Mar 2024 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 8:46 pm Post subject: Re: Sankyo Kohki Japan Komura 1:2.5 f=105mm |
|
|
mrlizard wrote:
Thank you!
[/quote]
Your first post won't show the images, now you should be good[/quote] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 661 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Tue Mar 05, 2024 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
I don't think they do all share the same thread. I am fairly sure that the large aperture tele lenses like the 85/1.4 and 135mm F/2 have a different threading. I'm not 100% sure about the 105mm F2. I tried to change the mount on a 100mm F/1.8 lens unsuccessfully using a mount from a cheaper 135mm F/2.8 lens. So, some care may be needed, it may be cheaper to try and find an M44 adapter for it, perhaps it was for Miranda camera mount. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mrlizard
Joined: 05 Mar 2024 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
mrlizard wrote:
Thanks. Good to know. I was thinking to try changing the mount but haven't even been able to remove this one and don't want to risk too much force. I also have no experience modifying lenses :S
Is Uni 44mm mount a different thread to the Miranda M44 or is it the same thing?
I was wondering about trying a M44 to M42 adapter and then a M42 to EF. I suppose I'd lose infinity focus. Not to mention elegance.
https://kamerastore.com/products/novoflex-miranda-m44-m42-adapter-co-m42-2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
[img]http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/
20243/10766_IMG_20240306_142209_1.jpg[/img]
I've just removed the Nikon mount ring and the threaded part measure 48mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Wonder if there would be a ring from 48mm (dunno pitch) to m42 so I could use this lens on a helicoid, as minimum focus distance I think is way to long |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7583 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 2:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
kiddo wrote: |
Wonder if there would be a ring from 48mm (dunno pitch) to m42 so I could use this lens on a helicoid, as minimum focus distance I think is way to long |
If pitch is 0.75mm
https://www.amazon.com/M42-M48-Step-Up-Coupling-Adapter-Telescope/dp/B081382KJV _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2024 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Thank you, I have nothing to measure the pitch size, hopefully someone else could confirm it |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|