Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 6:52 pm Post subject: Tefnon Kobori 35-80 f/3.5-4.8 |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
I got this as a "body cap" on a defective but now functional Pentax MX I found at the Adolph Gasser (classic San Francisco photo dealer) bargain table. $5 for a Pentax MX and a free lens!
Tefnon Kobori 35-80 f/3.5-4.8 on my "new" Pentax K1000 SE!
Anyway, this is a typical wide-tele all-purpose zoom of its day, from 1980 or a few years later I think. These were very common lenses for first time SLR users at the time, the ancestors of modern kit lenses. At the time dealers would often sell kits of a lower-end name brand SLR (like the K1000) with a "no-name" wide-tele zoom. Of course manufacturers themselves were trying to sell the same sorts of lenses, but they were not usually at the price point of the third parties.
Tefnon was a "house brand" for Kobori, as I understand it. Others included "Koboron", and I believe this whole line was often sold through importers under their many brands. Third party lenses of this late date aren't really in my range of interests, but I happened to have this while shooting with other lenses, so I thought it may be of interest to see what one can expect from this sort of lens, and this one seems typical of the type.
Kobori seems to have been a rather well-regarded maker regardless of its low cost, overall in the same category as Kiron, Komine and Tokina.
Another such Kobori wide-tele zoom (24-70) was reviewed by Ian, and that thread just popped up again today ! - what a coincidence. Ian's and Wadidiz's lenses are different of course, and of a rather higher category.
http://forum.mflenses.com/kobori-koboron-3-5-4-8-24-70-t67497.html
Mine is a two-touch wide-tele of very conservative specifications, with variable aperture, though that does not seem as extreme as some. It is a "macro", best used at 80mm, best considered a bit of marketing exaggeration, though it does focus down to 1 foot - .3 meters, which gives it a very useful close focus ability, and especially as that focus range is continuous and does not require changing modes with a switch, which was typical of the time.
The 35mm range extends the lens considerably, by 50% or more, which is a bit surprising. The lens overall is shortest at about 65mm.
My general impression is that this is really quite a sharp and contrasty lens, at all focal lengths at the center, even wide open. I can't say what the 35mm corners are like on full frame, and they might be lousy for all I know, but on APS-C in the field this certainly is not a disappointing performer. Flare is quite well controlled and this can be used for extreme backlight cases or with the sun in the frame without too much trouble. It doesn't compare with modern stuff that way, but its no slouch. Its a useful walk around lens and great for flowers outdoors in daylight. I suspect it would make a very decent portrait lens for any conventional work - hey, f/1.5 is HARD to use. f/5 is practical, and typical.
All at either f/8 or wide open -
The lizard -
crop -
_________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |