View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 12:36 pm Post subject: Kobori Koboron 3.5-4.8/24-70 |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I bought this lens by mistake, it had one bad picture and the description simply read ' nice old lens, clean condition'. It only cost 3.20ukp inc postage, so if it's awful, no loss.
The picture, with the red ring at the front made me think it was possibly a Canon FD L 24-35:
Nope, it's a Koboron 3.5-4.8/24-70 made by Kobori.
Can't find any info or samples, has anyone used this lens before? _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
That would have been an extreme real steal!
Not a too expensive bet after all. and the dream must have been fine.
Kobori made some nice lenses, may be good.
I have a nice built Sakar 28-105mm in MD mount that is probably made by Kobori, but that one doesn't make me happy.
I hope you have more luck with that one |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2014 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Cheers. I'll post some samples when the rain stops and i get chance to try it out. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark
Joined: 01 Dec 2012 Posts: 251 Location: Budapest, Hungary
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mark wrote:
Those 2 lenses seem to be identical, bad luck. :/ Btw is this name (Kobori Koboron) just a brand or a manufacturer? Sounds funny! _________________ Latest post on my blog (no new posts):
http://lightbeam-photography.blogspot.hu/2013/10/sword-lilies.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 749 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
Kobori is/was(?) a manufacturer. There are Vivitar lenses made by Kobori and I have a Promaster lens made by Kobori. They are also seen under other labels, including Tefnon.
Some of the lenses are considered quite good. The 28-200 manual focus zoom has received some praise. The 28-70 Promaster that I have used I find good but not outstanding.
I've seen comments on the net that the chairs of Minolta and Kobori sat on each other's boards and that Kobori manufactured some Minolta lenses.
Awaiting Ian's experience and comments. _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Minolfan
Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3439 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
I had forgotten that I have a 28-200mm AF Vivitar, made by Kobori.
That lens is good indeed! So there is some hope .. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2014 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Tefnon and Koboron were house brands of Kobori.
You can spot Vivitars made by Kobori by the 77xxxxx serial number.
I have that 28-200 as a Tefnon, it is surprisingly good, tests have shown it to be better than the Kiron 28-200 and the other 28-200s of that time.
I'll try to shoot some samples with my Koboron lens this week. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 7:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I tested the Koboron today. Immediately I was struck by how the thing suffers terribly from veiling flare - just the brightness of the sky in the top of the frame is enough to cause severe veiling flare! This is a lens that needs a hood, sadly I don't have a 67mm hood. I have ordered one and will repeat the test, but without a hood, the contrast is very low and the lens is hyper-susceptible to flare.
24mm setting,wide open:
100% crop from centre:
24mm setting, 1 stop closed:
100% crop from centre:
24mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
50mm setting, wide open:
100% crop from centre:
50mm setting, 1 stop closed:
100% crop from centre:
50mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
70mm setting, wide open:
100% crop from centre:
70mm setting, 1 stop closed:
100% crop from centre:
70mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
Quite interesting results - contrast is poor, colours a little muted, but sharpness and CA control are both pretty good I think. Wide open it's not that sharp, but acceptable, a tiny bit of visible CA but nothing to worry about. Closed 1 stop, it gets quite sharp and the CA goes, closed two stops and it's sharp.
It's sharper at the 70mm end and the contrast is better at this end too. The 24mm end looks to be the weakest.
Distortion looks pretty mild, I don't see any strong barrel distortion at the wide end or pincushion distortion at the long end. There will be some distortion of course, but it isn't noticeable to me in these test shots so I expect it won't be a problem.
All in all, it's not that bad at all, I need to try it again with a hood. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cyrano
Joined: 15 Feb 2013 Posts: 857 Location: UK
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cyrano wrote:
A hood should make a difference but it doesn't look like it will make a great deal of difference. I don't think it's very good at all I'm afraid. _________________ A whole bunch of stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SXR_Mark
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 506 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2014 8:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SXR_Mark wrote:
Wow, that is really bad.That lens must have really ineffective AR coatings. It reminds me of my uncoated dialytes! At least with the dialytes the focal length was large so I could use a really deep hood. With 24mm FL I would be surprised if a hood could be made deep enough to rescue its performance. For what you paid it was worth a punt though. _________________ Olympus OM-D E-M1 for everything |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
The flare is worst at the wide end and not that bad at the long end. The glass is clean, it's multi-coated, so must just be a case of poor coatings and/or poor internal light baffling.
Fixing the contrast and sharpening and the results look okay, although the 24mm end is rather less good:
24mm, 2 stops closed:
70mm, 2 stops closed:
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cyrano
Joined: 15 Feb 2013 Posts: 857 Location: UK
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
cyrano wrote:
I've just seen the price and with an effective hood and your pp it can only be described as a good thing. _________________ A whole bunch of stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
If it had decent coatings, it would be a good lens as the sharpness and CA control are very good, but the contrast and flare are very poor.
I did a second test on a closer subject. Sun was directly behind me back but there was still a lot of flare from the bright chrome.
24mm setting, wide open:
100% crop from centre:
24mm setting, 1 stop closed:
100% crop from centre:
24mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
50mm setting, wide open:
100% crop from centre:
50mm setting, 1 stop closed:
100% crop from centre:
50mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
70mm setting, wide open:
100% crop from centre:
70mm setting, 1 stop closed:
100% crop from centre:
70mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
Again, the sharpness is good, wide open it is acceptably sharp, 1 stop closed the sharpness is good and 2 stops closed it is very good, with the 70mm end being a bit sharper than the 24mm end.
The flare and low contrast, however, is very poor and this is worse at the 24mm end than the 70mm end. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Aug 14, 2014 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I did some PP to these samples and the result is not bad realy:
24mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
50mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
70mm setting, 2 stops closed:
100% crop from centre:
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2015 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Just to give an update - the fault was a mysterious greasy deposit on the sensor of my NEX-3. Once cleaned off, the contrast returned to normal and this lens is a really good performer. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wadidiz
Joined: 28 Dec 2016 Posts: 36 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wadidiz wrote:
I received a Koboron 24-70mm/3.5-4.8 in a package I bought and am surprised by the performance. It is in top condition, is all metal/glass/rubber, feels very precise & smooth and gives better-than-expected pictures. I tend to only use fixed-focus lenses but I'm actually starting to carry this instead. This photo is from my window, shot wide open at 70mm, ISO 250 on Sony A7. Will continue to test. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3072 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
That did seem like an unnatural amount of flare.
Glad you figured out the problem and every thing is good.
Anxious to see a few improved shots. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
devinw
Joined: 19 Aug 2016 Posts: 207 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
devinw wrote:
I was going to say.. It sure seems like there is a hazy deposit on one or more of the elements. Glad to hear you got it fixed up. _________________
Camera: Sony a6300
E-Mount: Zeiss/Sony 16-70 f/4, Samyang 12mm f/2
Rokkor: MD PG 50mm f1.4, MD 100mm Macro f3.5, MD 135mm f2.8, MD Zoom 35-70mm f3.5, MD Zoom 75-150 f4
Canon FD: nFD 50mm f1.4, Tokina AT-X 100-300mm f4
My Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/westonde/
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wadidiz
Joined: 28 Dec 2016 Posts: 36 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wadidiz wrote:
devinw wrote: |
...Glad to hear you got it fixed up. |
I suppose the "you" you and Uddhava are referring to is the person who posted two years ago and not me, who posted today? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uddhava
Joined: 22 Aug 2012 Posts: 3072 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2021-06-21
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uddhava wrote:
Wadidiz wrote: |
devinw wrote: |
...Glad to hear you got it fixed up. |
I suppose the "you" you and Uddhava are referring to is the person who posted two years ago and not me, who posted today? |
You would be correct. Your sample shows this to be a decent lens. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wadidiz
Joined: 28 Dec 2016 Posts: 36 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2017 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wadidiz wrote:
Another shot from my window with the Koboron. (I noticed the spots on my A7 sensor.) I'm surprised that I can find out almost nothing about Koboron except they apparently made lenses for Vivitar and Minolta and the not-so-encouraging photos earlier in this thread. The lens is somewhat heavy but I can't find any plastic that adds to the weight. Very solid and precise feel, focus and focal-length shift.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bmwtraveler
Joined: 07 Aug 2010 Posts: 23 Location: Bakersfield,Ca
|
Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2017 6:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bmwtraveler wrote:
That was the house brand for Cambridge Camera Exchange,New York,good dealer in the 70s,went down hill later,B & H lives there now,they also sold a SLR I think as the Lindenblatt KL-2,designed by Topcon,Cima took over from Topcon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
teapeng
Joined: 20 Jan 2017 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 6:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
teapeng wrote:
@Wadidiz, how do you attach this lens onto the A7? Which adapter were you using? I found a dirt cheap of this lens, thinking of buying it. Vintage lens just look sexy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Wadidiz
Joined: 28 Dec 2016 Posts: 36 Location: Stockholm, Sweden
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2017 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wadidiz wrote:
teapeng wrote: |
@Wadidiz, how do you attach this lens onto the A7? Which adapter were you using? I found a dirt cheap of this lens, thinking of buying it. Vintage lens just look sexy. |
I use a generic FD-E-mount adapter I bought on Ebay from a dealer called maxsuperdeal in Germany for around €10. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
juanpabloalvarez
Joined: 18 Mar 2024 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Mon Mar 18, 2024 10:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
juanpabloalvarez wrote:
Hello, is there still someone here in 2024? I have a Tokina 24-70 identical to this Kobori. I bought it like new. I plan to try it with a Sony a7IV as soon as I get an adapter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|