View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 8:50 pm Post subject: Rangefinder recommendation |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
I expect this will start a discussion!
I'm thinking about buying a rangefinder. My father always preferred them to SLRs, and I have his old Beauty Light-O-Matic III with Biokor-S 1.9/45 lens (from about 1961) which is beautifully solid and well-built. Unfortunately the round-the-lens selenium meter ist kaput. Something like that would be perfect. Any suggestions?
Just one stipulation - I don't want one with only auto mode. It has to have manual mode too, preferably metered. Old-fashioned matchneedle metering would be fine.
Oh, and no Leica suggestions please! _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I also prefer them over any SLR.
Canon QL-17 no matter is QL III or just QL-17 both are great it has manual mode and auto mode both.
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/filmcamera/japanese/canon-ql-17-fuji-sensia-100/?
There is so many excellent one but lack of manual mode , let me know if interest. Also need to know if you are interest about Russian Leica or Contax clone. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
Fed 4. If you like it, then upgrade to a Yashica of some kind (Minister?) If you like that, upgrade some more to a Contax. Before you know it, you will have your Leica (that you claim not to want just because your wife is watching) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 9:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
+1
Also if you don't already have a Konica C35, buy one. Best bang for the buck. _________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011 Posts: 960 Location: Austin
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
I had a Petri 7s for several years. It also has an around the lens meter. I had the 2.8 version which was sharp as a tack. There was also a 1.9 version, but I have not seen results from it.
Mine died when it fell out of my backpack while I was riding a bike...
They are pretty common though, and usually pretty cheap. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Sep 11, 2011 10:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
There are plenty of cheap ones.
Canon, Yashica, Konica Minolta all made excellent rangefinders.
The real problem is condition.
A very high proportion of those you will pick up on ebay have something wrong with them. Sometimes the fix is very simple. Sometimes it is a hopeless case. Its rarely possible to tell from the outside.
Personally, I have had great luck with Yashicas. I have a 1000 and a Lynx 14E, both were quite easy to get in gear - except for the lightmeters. I hear good things abou the Lynx 5000 also.
If you want a meter on your rangefinder, thats another issue. One more system that time can destroy, and another thing to fix. Personally I just carry around my indestructible cheap old plastic Sekonic. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
For metered ones, I may try to find a Kodak Retina III. However, the downside to meters, especially if you go vintage, is that they die off. In lieu of a meter, I guess a lot. Since I cut my teeth on a K1000 and had to learn which aperture and shutter combinations work on various focal lengths, I'm within a half-stop on about 90% of the photos I take unmetered. To that end, I would suggest a Retina II or IIa.
All the cameras suggested so far are fine for 35mm film. However, I'm developing a taste in viewfinder medium format photography, even though I took two shots today on my 6X9 and forgot to readjust the focus. Anyway, those are my thoughts. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
I forgot to add (because I'm quite tired tonight) that there's a free Android app (a couple actually) for light metering. I have BeeCam and it seems quite accurate. You can even adjust its settings and thereby compensate for your specific camera's quirks. And its free. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tikkathree
Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Posts: 755 Location: Lovely Suffolk in Great Britain
Expire: 2012-12-28
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
tikkathree wrote:
I'm firstly going to have a rant about "serious" EBay vendors who "haven't got a battery so light meter untested". For XX sake a few standard batteries don't cost a lot!!
Right, feeling slightly better now I'm not yet wise or experienced enough to say which rangefinder is intrinsically better than another but so far I like the compact simplicity of the Canon A35F
the clunky "go anywhere-ness" of the Yashica MG-1
and the big geared lens controls of my Mamiya Auto. Mind you I'm still on my first film in this one so it could turn out to be a pup!
_________________ I used to think digital was fun but then I discovered film, then I found old lenses and then, eventually I found rangefinders.
EOS 5DII, loadsalenses
Canon G9 IR conv,
MF: TLR, 645 and folders
35mm: Oly OM Pro bodies 1, 2, 3 and 4; Soviet RF kit |
|
Back to top |
|
|
berraneck
Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 972 Location: prague, czech republic
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 7:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
berraneck wrote:
do you need some RF with interchangeable lenses or not? in the first case, Bessa R2/3/4A or M , or Konica Hexar RF might be interesting regarding it´s price. for the second option, I´d go for Olympus 35RD or 35SP. If you could live only with autoexposure (though precise and correctable via ISO setting and highlight-button), I wouldn´t forget Olympus XA - it´s 35/2,8 lens is tack sharp and the size of camera fits your pocket _________________ equipment doesn´t count, good photographs do |
|
Back to top |
|
|
coffeebitte
Joined: 18 Aug 2011 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
coffeebitte wrote:
I am selling a Minolta 7s2 on ebay
http://www.ebay.ca/itm/260851322282?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
Told my wife I wanted to keep it for myself but she grunted at me and told me to resell it cuz we have to pay our bills.
I bet in 10 years this little camera will be worth a lot more than what I can get for it on ebay these days _________________ Two men looked outside prison bars. One saw mud, the other saw stars. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
coffeebitte
Joined: 18 Aug 2011 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
coffeebitte wrote:
I also have a fed but i hate this bulky camera. It's an 1980 olympic version.
who the hell would want to carry a camera this heavy with a mesely 3.5 apperture.
I am sure it's built well but this one I have no reason to keep so I am selling for as low as it will sell _________________ Two men looked outside prison bars. One saw mud, the other saw stars. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
+1
I have a couple of Vivitar 35ES RFs that are good, but Tv mode only.
FEDs & Zorkis are good fun, with the usual caveat of FSU cameras. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Thanks for the replies so far, a lot to think about and research.
I forgot to mention I already have a Zorki. I've used it for one film only and that's it. I detest the viewfinder and I don't trust the shutter speeds. I'm guessing the Fed is similar.
Luis and David: Years ago I was able to judge exposure fairly accurately too, but I soon forgot that skill when I got a camera with a meter and it would be fun to learn it again. I have a Weston handheld meter I could use if needed.
What made me think about using a rangefinder was the meeting in London on Wednesday, when we'll be doing mainly street work. I think I'll take Dad's camera and my meter and see if I can get to love it. It really is well built, very sharp lens and generally in very nice condition apart from the meter over-reading the light. It's a shame to let it die. Here are some pics:
_________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
That looks like a really nice looking camera....if you want to try another rangefinder look up the Yashica Minister D. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
There are a bunch of Japanese models from the 60s and 70s that are worth while - and much to my surprise (I know: I shouldn't be surprised) I really like the Konica Auto S2 (and probably would like the others in the series): it is one of the large form factor 35mm rf's, has shutter priority ae and manual exposure. About the only drawbacks are: I need to compensate about 2 stops on the meter, and when I extend the built in lens shade I see it in the view finder. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Xpres
Joined: 11 Dec 2007 Posts: 964 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-10-28
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 12:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Xpres wrote:
Peter, I was wondering what to take along on wednesday... it may well be a rangefinder.. which may well be a Zorki. _________________ Film... and sometimes SD14, 5D2 and some other suff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
The best rangefinder in the affordable range is the Kiev-4 in my opinion.
Beautiful large viewfinder (better than Contax) and you can mount different lenses on it,
like the excellent Russian Jupiter-8, Jupiter-3, Jupiter-12, Jupiter-9, Jupiter-11 and the Orion.
(and the Zeiss for Contax rangefinder should you be inclined for the expense)
The only problem is that light meter will not work.
You'll need to use a hand meter, there are some that are very small and pocketable,
I use this one which fits inside a very small pocket
and it does it's job fine:
http://www.sekonic.com/Products/L-208/Overview.aspx
It will meter better than the built-in meters and you'll be able to use it
with other cameras also. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Orio wrote: |
The best rangefinder in the affordable range is the Kiev-4 in my opinion.
Beautiful large viewfinder (better than Contax) and you can mount different lenses on it,
like the excellent Russian Jupiter-8, Jupiter-3, Jupiter-12, Jupiter-9, Jupiter-11 and the Orion.
(and the Zeiss for Contax rangefinder should you be inclined for the expense)
The only problem is that light meter will not work.
You'll need to use a hand meter, there are some that are very small and pocketable,
I use this one which fits inside a very small pocket
and it does it's job fine:
http://www.sekonic.com/Products/L-208/Overview.aspx
It will meter better than the built-in meters and you'll be able to use it
with other cameras also. |
+10 _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
I thought I'd quickly try out the Beauty with my Weston Master meter and the Minolta X500 as a check. I found a half-exposed roll of HP5 and finished it off with some quick shots around the garden, which I'll develop this evening probably.
The meter and the X500 were hanging round my neck but this heavy camera has no strap at present, so trying not to drop it while I was metering was a huge challenge. I gripped it between my knees! Plus I had to keep putting my glasses on and off to read the meters!
The controls on the Beauty are quite awkward. The focus knob is at about 7 o'clock as you look at the front of the lens. You need your right hand for the shutter button and for gripping the camera, so your left fingers have to curl round underneath the lens to find it, and there's a real risk of blocking the meter with your thumb. The aperture control is better, at 3 o'clock, which is fine for your left hand, but I kept moving it as I was focussing. The shutter speed control is OK, a simple ring, but difficult to find without looking.
One nice feature is that the shutter buttom is locked when the advance lever is snapped home. The shutter only fires when the lever is pulled out to its operating position.
I suppose I'd get used to the controls if I used only this camera all the time, but that won't happen. It was a present from my mother so I have to keep it, but I doubt I'll be using it any more. Now I'm going to make a list of all your suggestions and do some research. _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 5:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
By the way, normally I'd have heartily recommended the Kiev also, and concurred with my own +10!
But I'm currently punishing my Kiev for allowing me to mis-load the film, resulting in some interesting overlap and film skewing. These were some good shots, too
But. I'll forgive Kiev very soon and therefore will give my +10 now rather than in 2-3 days _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IANUS
Joined: 14 Oct 2008 Posts: 276 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
IANUS wrote:
I tried several rangefinders and finally settled with a Bessa R and a Werra camera.
I had those:
- Olympus 35RC, small, light, very good results but only usable in auto aperture mode (at least with my fingers) and longest time is 1/15s. Since I got a Rollei 35 I am not using this camera.
- Fed 5: Didn't like it for mechanical reason. Viewfinder/Rangefinder is awful, especially with glasses.
- Kiev ??: Nearly the same as the Fed
- Bessa R: Modern camera with big viewfinder and light meter. Much cheaper than a Leica. Comes with 39mm leica Screw mount to adopt a large range of classic lenses. VC lenses are great - especially the superwides.
- Werra: Very good rangefinder and finish of the camera. 3 interchangeable lenses (35mm Flektogon, 50mm Tessar and 100mm Cardinar). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish4570
Joined: 06 Jan 2010 Posts: 4514 Location: At the confluence of the Locust Fork of the Warrior River and Black Creek, Alabama
Expire: 2012-03-21
|
Posted: Tue Sep 13, 2011 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fish4570 wrote:
konica s III, all manual, superb lens. _________________ Paul
I chase Light
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
mo wrote: |
That looks like a really nice looking camera....if you want to try another rangefinder look up the Yashica Minister D. |
They're huge! I thought they were 120 RFs when I saw one in the flesh. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Sat Sep 17, 2011 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
mo wrote: |
That looks like a really nice looking camera....if you want to try another rangefinder look up the Yashica Minister D. |
They're huge! I thought they were 120 RFs when I saw one in the flesh. |
The Yashica Minister D was my first real camera....I still have it. _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|