View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
KhanX
Joined: 06 Sep 2007 Posts: 430 Location: Bangkok, Thailand, München, Göttingen, Germany
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:14 am Post subject: P. ANGENIEUX F 35 1:2.5 RETROFOCUS is the best lens or not? |
|
|
KhanX wrote:
Hi everybody,
My last post give me a lot of knowledges. I've more question about Paris Angenieux F35 1:2.5. exakta mount. How about the quality? I saw it on ebay.com, the price is 395 USD (not including shipping cost) do you think it's valueable? If I win, I need to buy exakta adaptor to Olympus 4/3. The adaptor price is 170 USD from the Kindai shop, Japan.
I've search the information of this lens on internet but it's too little to decide. Could you please introduce me for any detail of this lens?
Thanks a lot for all answer. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I don't know the Angenieux 35mm, probably is very good but for that money, you could buy a Distagon 1.4/35 or a Summicron 2/35, both of which are faster and (much probably) better lenses.
And if you consider the price for the adapter, you would also end up saving quite a lot of cash. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 7:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
I didn't know there was an Exakta adapter extant for 4/3. But 170USD?
That seems awfully steep!
Bill |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abbazz
Joined: 23 Jun 2007 Posts: 1098 Location: Jakarta
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 8:47 am Post subject: Re: P. ANGENIEUX F 35 1:2.5 RETROFOCUS is the best lens or n |
|
|
Abbazz wrote:
KhanX wrote: |
I've more question about Paris Angenieux F35 1:2.5. exakta mount. How about the quality? |
Angénieux lenses are good lenses but you can find better quality for less money elsewhere.
There is a buying frenzy on Internet with collectors (mainly from China) willing to pay big bucks for anything bearing the name Angénieux. The 35/2.5 in Exakta mount is famous because it was the first retrofocus lens for 35mm SLRs. Leave this lens to collectors and, as suggested by Orio, buy a better Zeiss or Leica lens for less money.
Cheers!
Abbazz _________________ Il n'y a rien dans le monde qui n'ait son moment decisif, et le chef-d'oeuvre de la bonne conduite est de connaitre et de prendre ce moment. - Cardinal de Retz
The 6x9 Photography Online Resource:
http://artbig.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
"Angénieux" - this name sounds like a thunder in the ears of some collectors. They are said to be legendary lenses, but there is always a considerable amount of myth in any legend.
If you look at some test done by photo magazines in the 70s and 80s, Angénieux lenses did not outperform Nikkors or Canon lenses and did not get close to Leica and Zeiss lenses.
It's a bit like driving a Rolls Royce. A Mercedes is at least as good, but not as expensive. Still some people want to have the badge "Rolls Royce" at their car... _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KhanX
Joined: 06 Sep 2007 Posts: 430 Location: Bangkok, Thailand, München, Göttingen, Germany
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KhanX wrote:
Thanks for all reply.
I'll test it when I receive this lens from Ebay. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Please, do not misunderstand us. An Angénieux is by no means bad! It is just a little too expensive. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Your country is beautiful, please select nice subjects and share your results here. Many thanks in advance! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Helios
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 537 Location: East of France
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helios wrote:
Hi , I own a couple of Angenieux M42 Lenses . They are very good , not more . In the 90/100 mm range , takumars 105 and 85 are better , and my 100 f/2,5 Rokkor too , but nor far away ... than the 2,5/90mm . In the 135mm focal length , Apo-Zenitar 135 , Takumar 3,5/135, J-37, are undoubtly over . The 135 is at the level of some oldies from germany , such as Schneider Tele-Xenar , Steinheil Tele-Quinar , Czj Sonnar . I compared 30 years ago A retrofocus angénieux 28mm vs smc-Takumar 3,5/28 . I bought the tak (brand new) , because the contrast was better , and colors more saturated .
So I left a second hand retrofocus (not cheap , 400 frf 1970 = 250 today euros ! )
I own a second copy of the 2,5/90 with some work to do on it (filter thread shocked, fungus, dust , helico?d grease completely dry , etc .... )
Yet , if you want the "nec plus ultra" , in 100mm range , what about a Kinoptik Apochromat f/2 100 mm ? a true legend in terms of overall quality . Price are far away from Angénieux .... ($2000) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Nice to see you here Helios! Thank you for inform us about these lenses. Personally I don't have any clue about French lenses. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
I searched for a Kinoptic Apochromat once on Ebay. Found one, at the cost of about half of my car. I never searched since. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Helios
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 537 Location: East of France
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Helios wrote:
Older Angénieux lenses (First Exakta range, M42) are not among the bests Angénieux produced . It is said last Alpa and Exakta Angénieux range were better , but what about Kern and Leitz optics of this time ? I appreciate to own some .I think french optics can be very good to excellent . One of my first 35mm camera I used was a Foca PfIII (Leica III clone ) with a collapsible 3,5/50mm lens (did you say Elmar copy ? ....)
This lens was fantastic , I took dias with Kodachrome 25, and they are among the sharpest pictures I ever took . Some owners of Foca Universal with the Oplarex 1,9/50 say that this camera and lens give results as good as Leica M3 with Summicron. Yet this camera was a bit more expensive than a M3 ...
So , glory for Angénieux, Berthiot , Kinoptik .... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
patrickh
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Helios - welcome indeed. Oh no - now we pursue French lenses as well as Russian, German, etc?
patrickh
PS I will have to look but I think photodo had some resolution tests on an Angeieux. _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Helios wrote: |
Hi , I own a couple of Angenieux M42 Lenses . ... |
Hi and welcome! Nice to have you with us. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Helios
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 537 Location: East of France
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Helios wrote:
Thanks for the welcome , everybody ! I picked a portrait with Angénieux 2,5/90
http://photos1.blogger.com/hello/94/3348/1024/IMGP2303.jpg
Hope this url work . otherwise see my blog ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
This is pleasant result, looks nice for portrait. I remember for your Pentacon 135mm zebra shoot in portrait action, that lens is my favorite. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
KhanX
Joined: 06 Sep 2007 Posts: 430 Location: Bangkok, Thailand, München, Göttingen, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KhanX wrote:
Thank a lot for all comments.
Helios, you details is great for me. I'll take any comment of yours for me to decide before buy Angenieux lens.
_________________ Camera : Leica M8, Sony Nex5, Sigma SD14, Canon 5D, Olympus E-1, Panasonic DMC L1, Pentax K10D Grand Prix, Nikon D1X, Contax RTS III, Contax 167MT, Exakta RTL1000, Minolta X-700, Canon T90, Canon F-1, Pentacon Six TL
Lens :
Tele : Canon FD 300mm f2.8 s.s.c. fluorite, Mamiya 645 500mm f5.6, Pentacon 500mm f5.6, Sigma APO 300mm f4 macro, Nikkor Reflex C 500mm f8, Canon FD 200mm f2.8 s.s.c., Rubinar 300mm f4.5 mirror
Macro : Vivitar Series 1 90mm f2.8, Vivitar VMC 100mm f2.8 Macro, Panagor PMC 90mm f2.8, Edicar 90mm f2.8 Macro, Nikon Micro 55mm f3.5, Takumar 50mm f4 Macro, Nikon Non AI 55mm f3.5 Micro, SMC Takumar 100mm f4 macro, Canon FD 100mm f4 Macro, Canon FD 200mm f4 Macro, Volna-9 50mm f2.8
Short tele : Pentacon Six 120mm f2.8, Carl Zeiss Contax T* 100mm f2, Meyer optik Trioplan 100MM F2.8, Porst 135mm f1.8, Sigmatel ys 135mm f1.8, Schneider 135mm f3.5, Makinon 135mm f3.5, Komura 135mm f3.5, Hexanon 100mm f2.8, Schneider Variogon 80-240mm 4.5, Schneider 135mm f4
Normal : Canon 50mm f0.95, Schneider 50mm f0.95, Hexanon 57mm f1.2, Hexanon 40mm f1.8, Taylor hobson 50mm f1.8, Cooke Kinetal 50mm f1.8, Canon EF 28mm f2.8, Leica 14-50mm f2.8-3.5 Mega O.I.S., Carl Zeiss Contax Distagon 18mm f4, Carl Zeiss Contax Planar T* 50mm f1.4, Carl Zeiss Contax 35mm f1.4, Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm f3.5-5.6 Macro, Yashica 35mm f2.8, Helios 44-2/58, Helios 85mm f1.5, Pentax SMC-M 50mm f1.4, Pentax SMC-F 28mm f2.8, Minolta MD Rokkor 28mm f2.8, Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm f2.8, Minolta MD Rokkor 50mm f1.7, Minolta MC PF Rokkor 50mm f1.4, Porst 28mm f2.8, Meyer - Optik Lydith 30mm f3.5, Nikon AIS 50mm f1.2, Tamron SP 28mm f2.8 adaptall, Pentax SMC Takumar 85mm f1.8, Vivitar Series 1 55mm f1.2, Canon FD 85mm f1.2L, Canon FD 55mm f1.2L, Angenieux 135mm f3.5, Cooke Kinetal 75mm f2.6, Steinheil 85mm f2.8, Leica M 50mm f2, Zeiss flextogon 35mm f2.4, Pancolar 50mm f1.8, Schneider Xenar 85mm f4
Wide : Leica Elmerit M 28mm f2.8 asph, Zeiss Contax 21mm f2.8, Zeiss Flextogon 20mm f2.8, Exakta 24mm f2.8 macro, Tokina 17mm f4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
DANG this portrait is SHARP!
What camera did you take it with? _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Helios
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 537 Location: East of France
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helios wrote:
Yes , it is sharp . Anyway these two lenses (135mm too) are prone to huge flare until f/8 ! and this picture was made using a 60mm sunshade ....In the "sharpness" "tray" , SMC Takumar 1,8/85 is a bit more contrasty ... And for absolute sharpness , the 1,7 / 50mm SMC M and the 1,4A are undoubtly better ...
I took some pictures in 2002 at a weekly vintage show , and this picture is one of the most saturated I'd ever took (On film Agfacolor, scanned with sprintscan 35+ Polaro?d) I think the american lab did a good "saturation boost job" , the other picture are also very warm and saturated . Lenses I used this day were : smc takumar 3,5/28, 1,8/55 , and the Angénieux Y12 2,5/90 .
Angénieux lenses of my range are not perfect but near ...
Another tip : only alpa and exacta mounts provide automatic diaphragm . Other mounts such as Rectaflex, M42 , LTM39 (of course...) have only manaul setting ring , without any "click" ...
So , if I had the oppotunity to buy a third, fourth, fifth "Lens from Paris" , I 'll do so . The only problem nowadays seems to be the price ....
Here the Angénieux Y12 :
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2018/2175855338_fe6f1c3359_b.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2382/2175843556_32313870ce_b.jpg
More pics on Flickr's.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|