View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
scsambrook
Joined: 29 Mar 2009 Posts: 2167 Location: Glasgow Scotland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
scsambrook wrote:
I'm late coming into this discussion, but doesn't the lens remind us of the old 135/225 F2.8/5.6 'Twin Tamron'? The style is different but the idea's exactly the same. Back in the early 1960s I had a 135/225 f4.5 of almost exactly similar styling as this lens, same aperture scales, but with more chrome trim. I think the brand was 'Sankor'. Not sure if that helps or just muddies the waters still further . . . _________________ Stephen
Equipment: Pentax DSLR for casual shooting, Lumix G1 and Fuji XE-1 for playing with old lenses, and Leica M8 because I still like the optical rangefinder system. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
The Tamron twin tele/converto/etc (they had various names) set is quite well known, several members here have them, and I myself have had 6-7 copies of different variants at various times.
There were two basic versions, one a tiny 135/4.5 and the other a 135/2.8 both with matched tc's. The small one was made in black, zebra and bright aluminum finishes, and in several brands. The big one did not have such extreme cosmetic variations. There are quite a few posts here on these.
This looks like it is a matched set indeed, but does not look at all like any known Tamron product, and certainly not like these two lenses. It is someone else's matched set, and quite uncommon.
Komura certainly made lenses that had a similar layout, but this does not look like a Komura product either.
I have had several old Sankors, and there were apparently two major variants of their 135/2.8s, but neither is at all similar.
In some ways it reminds me of a Kyoei, but feels not quite right.
If I had to choose a most similar lens I would have to say maybe Kawakami/Kawanon, but I would be speculating. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 2:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
And old preset Tokina also, which are extremely similar to Kawanon. The basic structure closely matches either.
But both would imply a considerable cosmetic variant here. Totally redone focus ring and preset rings. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Thanks for the feedback fellas.
To make it a little easier, here is the lens on its own without the distraction of the converter.
It is yet to have a T mount fitted.
The observation that these are a matched set look to be on the money as well.
Here is a re-connected view and the knurling is identical as is the Lens Made in Japan script
OH
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 4:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
OK, a T mount has finally arrived and fits like a glove.
And so I took it for a quick spin.
Point it anywhere but up and wide open it is not too shabby - see first pic.
Point it anywhere near horizontal and - well what do you think.
It gets worse as it is stopped down.
Number 2 and number 4 are wide open. Numbers 3 and 5 are f5.6
Hmmm ...............
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Ha - I have become so accustomed to shooting without a lens hood that I forgot just how badly some lenses behave without one, and how well behaved they can become with one.
Here is take two with suitably shielded lens.
Much better I think.
Again these pairs are shot firstly wide open, then @ f5.6
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Always, always use a hood, the bigger the better. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2014 4:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Always, always use a hood, the bigger the better. |
Yes sensei.
Here is a 100% crop of number 6 above.
This lens is not too shabby at all.
OH
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8982 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
A spiratone perhaps
Click here to see on Ebay _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3693 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Being in fact Sankor (E serial). And possibly Sonnar design (many small separations between glued elements can be seen).
_________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2014 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Thanks everyone for the feedback.
A Sankor perhaps.
Here is the lens, now sporting its new T mount for PK and its new lens hood courtesy of an old Sun lens.
More images to follow.
Cheers
OH
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6009 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2014 10:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Accidentally let the lens tip and fall onto the table last night from a height of around 1-1/2 inches.
Serendipitously this loosened the screw securing the front element.
A quick unscrew and I was able to clean up the fungus between the two elements.
The lens is now as clean as a whistle.
Finally, some images that show this lens' potential.
Not too shabby.
Many thanks Mo.
OH
<100% crop:
<100% crop:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2014 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Well, thats why a hammer is in my lens tools bag.
Its not just for when I get frustrated.
Looking good. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011 Posts: 800 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Tue Apr 22, 2014 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Accidentally let the lens tip and fall onto the table last night from a height of around 1-1/2 inches.
Serendipitously this loosened the screw securing the front element.
A quick unscrew and I was able to clean up the fungus between the two elements. |
thats what a friend calls "a happy accident" _________________ Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|