View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:25 am Post subject: M42 -> EOS adapter, damage to camera possible? |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
Hello,
I am quite new to MF lenses on my Canon EOS 30D. Until now I used a simple machined M42 to EOS adapter without AF focus confirmation ship.
Based on a review by Bob Atkins, I ordered a M42 to EOS adapter with a chip glued on it from a Russian company called Rugift (Bob Atkins speaks highly of them). It has not arrived yet, but I have some worries about that chip:
While it would be very helpful to have a focus assist, is there any risk that the chip can short circuit or damage the AF circuit in my camera? How critical is the alignment of the chip on the adapter? Does anyone have those Rugift adapters, and how well do they work?
Thanks in advance for your answers! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 11:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Welcome! We have many Canon owners I hope they are reply to you soon. I never heard this kind of problem with adapters. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SkedAddled
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 1440 Location: Michigan, USA
Expire: 2021-08-12
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 5:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SkedAddled wrote:
There have been issues reported, but these seem to be rare.
Ebay has some suggested articles linked during certain search results,
and one of them was about how someone had a chip fry his EOS camera.
Unfortunately, ebay isn't responding for me right now. Once I can get
back on their system, I'll look for that article and post the link for you. _________________ Craig
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard!?
Canon Digital EOS 5D Mk IV, EOS 50D, Powershot S3 iS
Vivitar 28 f/2.8 OM - Zuiko 50 f/1.8 OM - Tamron SP 28-80 f/3.5 AD2[Favorite!] - Hanimar 135 f/3.5 M42 - Soligor 135 f/2.8 T4 - Tamron SP 60-300 f/3.8 AD2 - Soligor 75-260 f/4.5 M42 - Soligor 400 f/6.3 T4 - Soligor 500 f/8 T2 Cat + Matched 2X TC - Addiction Growing!
This is us -- We drive these -- We're named these |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 7:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Hi, and welcome. Most of us here with Canon cameras use EOS adapters with AF-confirm chips and I've never heard of any problem with shorting out the contacts or any other damage to the camera - the chip is identical to the contacts on Canon lenses.
I don't know of any particular problems with Rugift but maybe you can find something if you search for it on our forum (use the search link at the top of the page). I think, in the main, complaints have been about the price and speed of delivery.
One or two of us here have bought adapters from a very helpful Ebay seller in Hong Kong who I would recommend. His site has videos and other information which will be interesting for you. And he will answer any questions you might have.
Click here to see on Ebay
Who is Bob Atkins? _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Well, I have not experieced any damage, but somtimes my chipped adapters produce ERR messages or even a high pitched sound in the cam . And I constantly have a weird feeling when I use the adapters, for the same reason that you mention.
That's one of the reasons why I do not use them any more. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
Well, I have not experieced any damage, but somtimes my chipped adapters produce ERR messages or even a high pitched sound in the cam . And I constantly have a weird feeling when I use the adapters, for the same reason that you mention.
That's one of the reasons why I do not use them any more. |
Thanks!
Did you try different brands, btw? Or didn't you want to risk that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 8:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I know our member tried different brands, because not every adapter support perfectly infinity focus. I hope Orio, F16Sunshine and many others able to suggest you good ones. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SkedAddled
Joined: 19 Oct 2008 Posts: 1440 Location: Michigan, USA
Expire: 2021-08-12
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SkedAddled wrote:
I managed to find the article I was looking for. It talks of Nikon-to-EOS, but it probably has to do with AF-confirm chips in general.
Admittedly, this seems to be a rare occurrence, but it's worth keeping in mind when outfitting DSLRs.
CAUTION: AF-Confirm Nikon Adapter for EOS cameras _________________ Craig
Of course I'm all right! Why? What have you heard!?
Canon Digital EOS 5D Mk IV, EOS 50D, Powershot S3 iS
Vivitar 28 f/2.8 OM - Zuiko 50 f/1.8 OM - Tamron SP 28-80 f/3.5 AD2[Favorite!] - Hanimar 135 f/3.5 M42 - Soligor 135 f/2.8 T4 - Tamron SP 60-300 f/3.8 AD2 - Soligor 75-260 f/4.5 M42 - Soligor 400 f/6.3 T4 - Soligor 500 f/8 T2 Cat + Matched 2X TC - Addiction Growing!
This is us -- We drive these -- We're named these |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
eeyore_nl wrote: |
LucisPictor wrote: |
Well, I have not experieced any damage, but somtimes my chipped adapters produce ERR messages or even a high pitched sound in the cam . And I constantly have a weird feeling when I use the adapters, for the same reason that you mention.
That's one of the reasons why I do not use them any more. |
Thanks!
Did you try different brands, btw? Or didn't you want to risk that? |
I have tried several noname brands and can't remember which adapter I got from what seller. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
SkedAddled wrote: |
I managed to find the article I was looking for. It talks of Nikon-to-EOS, but it probably has to do with AF-confirm chips in general.
Admittedly, this seems to be a rare occurrence, but it's worth keeping in mind when outfitting DSLRs.
CAUTION: AF-Confirm Nikon Adapter for EOS cameras |
Thanks for the link.
Actually, my Nikon-EOS-adapters are the most reliable ones I have... _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
peterqd wrote: |
Hi, and welcome. Most of us here with Canon cameras use EOS adapters with AF-confirm chips and I've never heard of any problem with shorting out the contacts or any other damage to the camera - the chip is identical to the contacts on Canon lenses.
I don't know of any particular problems with Rugift but maybe you can find something if you search for it on our forum (use the search link at the top of the page). I think, in the main, complaints have been about the price and speed of delivery.
One or two of us here have bought adapters from a very helpful Ebay seller in Hong Kong who I would recommend. His site has videos and other information which will be interesting for you. And he will answer any questions you might have.
Click here to see on Ebay
Who is Bob Atkins? |
Does the one in that image have the stopdown flange?
I have an M42 EOS with the flange and was thinking of sanding it off as I don't need it. I like the adapter as it has an focus confirm chip that seems to be accurate. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
I have an M42 EOS with the flange and was thinking of sanding it off as I don't need it. I like the adapter as it has an focus confirm chip that seems to be accurate. |
The adapter I got has a flange indeed. It arrived this morning, and both focus and metering seem to be spot on. If it keeps working like that, I am very happy! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Rense
Joined: 12 Sep 2008 Posts: 250 Location: Arnhem, The Netherlands
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 10:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Rense wrote:
I use that adapter on my 20D no problems here. _________________ [5D][20D][50D][70D][EOS-M][Tamron Adaptall lenses][M42 lenses]
for complete gearlist, click here.
Last edited by Rense on Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:16 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Never had a problem. _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
Does the one in that image have the stopdown flange?
I have an M42 EOS with the flange and was thinking of sanding it off as I don't need it. I like the adapter as it has an focus confirm chip that seems to be accurate. |
Why? What benefit will that give? _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Hi Peter
If I remove the flange, I can set the desired aperture I want to shoot at, swicth the A/M switch to A to open up to focus, then switch back to M to take the shot.
It's just a bit quicker than turning the aperture selector back and forth to focus and meter. I have a few non-AF confirm adapters without the flange and use them as above. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 7448 Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
martinsmith99 wrote: |
Hi Peter
If I remove the flange, I can set the desired aperture I want to shoot at, swicth the A/M switch to A to open up to focus, then switch back to M to take the shot.
It's just a bit quicker than turning the aperture selector back and forth to focus and meter. I have a few non-AF confirm adapters without the flange and use them as above. |
Ah, I see, that makes sense. I always focus first, before I set the aperture. Do you have any lenses without an A-M switch? (Tamron, Helios-44M4, Domiplan for instance) _________________ Peter - Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
My m42 lenses all have the A/M switch. My other lenses do not.
For studio work the A/M switch speeds things up. I used a Volna for my last studio shoot and had to keep opening up to focus then count 6 clicks to stop down to F8. Sadly the Volna has gone to it's new home today. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|