| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
woodrim
 Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4069 Location: Charleston
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nixland
 Joined: 30 Jan 2011 Posts: 585
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2011 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
Wow, it's very impressive!!
Could you show us the size of the lens? (by putting the CF/SD card beside itu maybe). Thanks. _________________ Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woodrim
 Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4069 Location: Charleston
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Sorry to take so long, Nix... and thanks for your interest. I rather like this lens, but I am also partial to Komura.
 _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iangreenhalgh1
 Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Beautiful pics, looks like a very special lens, you should try shooting some portraits with it.
Are Komura lenses sold under other brands? Can't say I've ever seen a Komura branded lens. Promura, yes, but Komura, no. In fact, I have a Promura 4.5/300 I need to take apart and clean. If Promura is a rebrand of Komura you just motivated me to get the screwdrivers out. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woodrim
 Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4069 Location: Charleston
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Mar 28, 2011 10:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Ian: I am not familiar with Promura. Thanks for the reminder about portraits. I did finally get a chance with two of my girls ...
 _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nixland
 Joined: 30 Jan 2011 Posts: 585
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue Mar 29, 2011 2:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
Thanks for the comparison photos. Cute small lens indeed.  _________________ Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woodrim
 Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4069 Location: Charleston
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
iangreenhalgh1
 Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 3:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Very nice shots, so much sharper than either my Primotar 135 or Jupiter 11A 135, definitely want to pick up any komuras I see! _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woodrim
 Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4069 Location: Charleston
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 2:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Don't buy one for sharpness alone. I doubt it's as sharp as Jupiter (I don't have Primotar). I just happen to like Komura as a package - IQ, handling, build quality.
In fact, I am having trouble with this lens that I do not yet fully understand. Too many of my pictures are lacking sharpness and also seem to have a strangeness about them. I wonder about refraction, except I only use down to f/5.6. I cannot yet tell if it's a focus problem, infinity, or something more sinister. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woodrim
 Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4069 Location: Charleston
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
It's worse than I thought - the lens checks out okay. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nesster
 Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
show us some of the strangeness!
With my 135/2.3 komura I saw strangeness when I attempted to use it on an ES-II, but so far it's been fine on a K100D. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spotmatic
 Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
What's so sinister about it? It's probably an Ernostar type, just like my Komura 80mm f/1.8 (M42). Very soft wide open, but it quickly gets better while stopping down. Also the color definition of the Komuras are very good and your samples show it.
Some samples with my 80mm f/1.8 Komura: http://forum.mflenses.com/a-winter-walk-ii-komura-80mm-f-1-8-t23752.html _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woodrim
 Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4069 Location: Charleston
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
What I implied by my last post is that the problem has turned out to be me. And I think a combination of things... first, it looked as though it focused past infinity, so I have been backing off a tad as I do with most M42 adapted lenses. Problem was that I never confirmed it and just now it proved good at infinity, so I was in error to back off. Beyond that, I had to have been experiencing movement, so I'll have to redouble my attention to that.
Some pictures were so sharp that I was confused at what was going on, but that should have told me it was me, not the lens. To comply with Nesster, here is one strangeness image that was certainly not infinity. The in-focus area looks distorted to my eyes. Movement? Well, it was 1/60 sec. I'm getting too old to still be making these mistakes.
And here's one where I probably made that unnecessary adjustment:
Peter: I would love to add the 80mm f/1.8 to my Komura collection, but the prices!!!!! _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
woodrim
 Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4069 Location: Charleston
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Nesster: I use a SONY A200, 10mp CCD.
Peter: That 80mm seems to be a no excuses lens. Of course, you do have a way with lenses. I presume it has the many blade diaphragm characteristic of Komura lenses? Thus the bokeh. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Spotmatic
 Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
| woodrim wrote: |
Nesster: I use a SONY A200, 10mp CCD.
Peter: That 80mm seems to be a no excuses lens. Of course, you do have a way with lenses. I presume it has the many blade diaphragm characteristic of Komura lenses? Thus the bokeh. |
In my example the diahpragm is perfectly round at all f/stops. Not a star like in your copy.
BTW: I'm glad the lens is not at fault but that it was you  _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Attila
 Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57994
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue May 10, 2011 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| woodrim wrote: |
Don't buy one for sharpness alone. I doubt it's as sharp as Jupiter (I don't have Primotar). I just happen to like Komura as a package - IQ, handling, build quality.
|
+1 I had Komura 135, 200mm sharpness was average , all other thing was great especially their color rendering. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oldhand
 Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6015 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
This is a beautiful portrait lens.
Here is a shot from today
Tom
#1
Crop from above
#2
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Minolfan
 Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3451 Location: Netherlands
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Lovely portrait!
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oldhand
 Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6015 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| Minolfan wrote: |
Lovely portrait!
 |
Thank you.
That was in a very thoughtful mood.
She is usually quite bright and cheerful.
Taken with the same lens - Sankyo Kohki Komura 105mm f2.5
#1
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Doc Sharptail
 Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1493 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
 _________________
D-810, F2, FTN, FT-3 in Black
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f2 H.C. nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Minolfan
 Joined: 30 Dec 2008 Posts: 3451 Location: Netherlands
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 19, 2022 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Minolfan wrote:
Very nice again! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John Shriver
 Joined: 24 Dec 2009 Posts: 204
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
John Shriver wrote:
Looks to me that it's a Unidapter lens. Does the rear have "UNI. P" engraved on it? That would indicate Unidapter for Pentax.
My Komura 100/1.8 currently has a UNI P mount on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jamaeolus
 Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 3200 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
 _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oldhand
 Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6015 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| John Shriver wrote: |
Looks to me that it's a Unidapter lens. Does the rear have "UNI. P" engraved on it? That would indicate Unidapter for Pentax.
My Komura 100/1.8 currently has a UNI P mount on it. |
Yes, it has UN P on the back.
I'll get a picture as soon as I can
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Oldhand
 Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6015 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2022 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Images of the lens itself.
The lens is quite short. The lens hood is attached to a filter and a stepping ring.
Tom
#1
#2
#3
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|