First Roll of TMAX100 on Canon A1

djmike · Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan

Here is my first roll of TMAX100 on Canon A1 with FD 50/1.8, developed by local store. I think they have high contrast.
Need comment or advise. Mike

marty · Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 767 Location: Italy

Hi, Mike.
Indeed they look contrasty, specially #2: darkest parts totally black and no detail in brightest either. Did you scan prints or negatives? Not knowing it's difficult to guess the problem (if any). Then how was the light when you took the shots (e.g. bright sunlight, or rainy or overcast)? Many variables are involved.

Cheers, Marty.

djmike · Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan

Marty, Thanks. They are developed and scanned at store. It seems I have to find another store for this film.
Mike

marty · Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 767 Location: Italy

Have you looked at the negatives ? Let's say the 2nd one. Do yo see any texture in the bike tires or the car ones? How about the ground behind the car tire? If you see clearly detail there then is probably just a poor scan job.
If you do not see anything there then could be underexposure, but difficult to say without seeing the neg. What caused the U/E is just matter of guess as for me, could be a human error or camera fault or maybe the contrast of the scene was simply beyond the latitude of the film. You see what I mean when I say many variables. All in in all is just your first BW film if I'm understanding right. First thing I'd check the camera meter against a trusted one (either another camera or an external one) just to be sure. If it's ok I 'd try then a different film, maybe it will match better with the shop developing workflow. BW film is rather different than C-41 color stuff, there is much more interaction within exposure and processing (many different options for development). Just check the darkroom section or bw gallery and you'll see what I mean. I hope I succeeded in giving you some good tip to point you in the right direction rather than make even more confusion Smile

.

Cheers, Marty.

Nesster · Expire: 2014-02-20

I notice that scanner auto exposure is often not set correctly; though it can yield 'good enough' scans, especially for small prints, detail can be lost. Seems to have something to do with the average tones of the scene.

If you scan the film yourself, you can manually adjust the dark and light points - it's better to get a scan that looks too flat and then to adjust it in post.

djmike · Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan

Marty, thanks.
I check the film further, it seems I can see the car tire/ground and some detail on the saddle. It's auto scanning probelm. I shall ask the Store to rescan it.
Mike

LucisPictor · Expire: 2013-12-03

I agree. I like high contrast b&w, but this is too much.

martinsmith99 · Expire: 2013-11-18

I use Tri-X and find it low contrast. I was expecting to see similar results.

It looks like the lowlights are clipped.

Orio · Expire: 2012-12-04

T-Max is more contrasted than TX (reason why I like it better), but in this case it's surely the scanner's fault.

martinsmith99 · Expire: 2013-11-18

Thanks for clarifying Orio. I'll add to the ever-extending list of films to try.