View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2022 8:48 pm Post subject: Elmo Projection 1.2/50: always closer |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
An Elmo projection 1.2/50 lens put on Sony Nex keeps a notable central sharpness but does not cover an APS-C completly and swirls on edges. For this reason it remains a "character lens", even though in some way less queer than Ro-109-1A, Som Berthiot or Benoist Berthiot with similar parameters.
The lack of diaphragm in its case cannot be compensated with a cardboard snap-on ring, as it would vignette the image even more. But it still looks not bad.
The shots are taken WO and tweaked a bit: mostly exposure is reduced and contrast boosted.
#1 At MFD on a custom helical adapter
#2 Further
#3 Close to infinity, to reach the rainbow
#4 Back to close up
#5 OOF gradual dissolution
#6 Explicit swirl
#7 Pure bokeh
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7796 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2022 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
It's certainly a 'character lens' - but a very good one, it has plenty of character.
_________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2022 10:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7584 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2022 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
If you made cardboard snap-on ring in different shapes, you have a budget Petzval Art Lens. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16664 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 6:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
_________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Crazy Leica Fox
Joined: 29 Apr 2017 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Crazy Leica Fox wrote:
My favorites are #3 and #6.
#3 is like what Instagram "influencers" try to achieve with their fancy apps but can never quite reach. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 12:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you fellows!
Crazy Leica Fox, do you think the future of Instagram is more and more users with mirrorless cams and strange lenses?
Calvin, I made a simple cardboard aperture ring with a baroque shape. I think, the lens speed beacame kind of f2.8 with it. To my surprise, the ring does not vignette the lens more than when it is WO.
Here is a couple of shots WO and with the ring on, which changes a bit the bokeh and the DOF.
#1 WO
#2 Ring on
#3 WO
#4 Ring on
Besides, this lens is also very good at infinity in the central part of the frame.
#5 Here is an example
#6 WO unprocessed, 100% crop from the previous
#7 Twilight rendering is also nice, unless you catch a circular stray reflection on the sensor
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2971 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
These photos tickle me.... _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Where did you place the cardboard in? Front lens or inside the group? On m4/3 might turn to be sharp all across the image lens ; btw ,what is the baroque shape cardboard? Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 4:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Jamaeolus, nice to hear!
Kiddo, it is as simple as that: just a piece of thin cardboard in front of the lens, which is not even black. I commonly use quickly made ones on various projection lenses, leaving a small "ear" on the ring to easily pull it out the barrel. This time the "ear" got too short, so some paper dust is formed, coming from my atempts to catch the ring.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Interesting, I've read that on colorplan, best place would be berween the third and fourth elements,,not on front of the lens; |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 6:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
I have no doubts that optically speaking this would be more correct. Just you need machinery and skills to do it. A small paper circle made of useless package cardboard is a quicker solution. It might change bokeh and DOF in a less evident manner, but it still does. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7584 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
I have no doubts that optically speaking this would be more correct. Just you need machinery and skills to do it. A small paper circle made of useless package cardboard is a quicker solution. It might change bokeh and DOF in a less evident manner, but it still does. |
YES. Just some pint light source will give you ninja star shaped bokeh. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 9:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Would a round ring instead baroque one, make any difference? What about mounting it on the mount side of the lens (as there are some lenses that have their diaphragm on the back) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2022 10:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Would try it with different light sources.
As long as the flange distance of this particular lens is very short, and I need to fix it in the adapter in a way that it is almost completely inside the tube and amost touching the sensor, there is very little space for a back aperture ring. That might be done, I think, but of a more solid material than the poor cardboard spreading paper dust here and there. If I stumble upon a well adapted material, I would be tempted to test.
The aperture shape, even of such snap-on rings, normally changes the bokeh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2971 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2022 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
An aperture that is very close to sensor will probably give more pronounced vignetting. _________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Crazy Leica Fox
Joined: 29 Apr 2017 Posts: 73
|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2022 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Crazy Leica Fox wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
Crazy Leica Fox, do you think the future of Instagram is more and more users with mirrorless cams and strange lenses? |
No, that would be too much work. Instagram is all about instant gratification, simply pushing a button to apply an effects filter and uploading the result.
jamaeolus wrote: |
These photos tickle me.... |
I was waiting for the Tickle Me Elmo reference! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2022 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
jamaeolus wrote: |
An aperture that is very close to sensor will probably give more pronounced vignetting. |
Ah, that makes sense!
Got now much of material about tickled Elmo.
Next step is to convince Instagram people to use mirrorless and to come discuss it here. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
#1
#2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2022 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Some low light urban shots, including some better showing the bokeh shape with the cardboard aperture on and off, and one which shows the flare (always on Sony Nex).
#1
#2
#3 Cosmic flare
Bokeh variations
#4 WO
#5 With aperture ring on
#6 At MFD or almost with my setup
#7 Just bokeh with the snap on aperture ring
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2022 7:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Ingredients
#1
#2
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|