| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:54 am Post subject: Comparing MY Jupiter-9 85mm f2 silver, black & black MC |
 |
|
nixland wrote:
Well, in several posts that I read, many confirmed that the silver is sharper than the black MC, but still, knowing that the QC of the latest Jupiter lens (J-9 MC) might be not as strict as the earlier version, I still consider that my J-9 MC could be not a good copy one.
So that’s why I add the word “MY” in the title 
The black J-9 was the the first lens that capture my heart into manual lens world.
I spot it on the local flea market, tried it and suddenly amazed by it’s unique rendering.
At broad day light outdoor, It glows and hazy and has low constrast at wide open, but indoor it shines.
This lens is a gate opener for my passion to explore manual lens (positive side) and the unstoppable LBA later on, especially portrait lenses (very negative side  ). I will not sell this poor black J-9, it’s too memorable.
Later on I bought the silver J-9 and the black MC J-9.
I was very surprised that the silver J-9 is a very good performer, knowing that it’s the oldest version.
The black MC has better color but it still has the glow on outdoor shots, and has a more pronounced bokeh ring.
Below are some comparison shots taken with the three J-9.
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
Last edited by nixland on Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:04 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
Sequence for all comparison shots, from top to bottom : silver, black, black MC
Sharpness, contrast and "glowing" test outdoor at wide open.
100% crop
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
Last edited by nixland on Mon Sep 26, 2011 9:05 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
Bokeh, sharpness and 'glowing' test ...... sounds odd, there is a 'glowing' test
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
Bokeh, color and CA ...
the silver has a green cast
also the black version ...
the MC has better color ...
All three has no CA spotted
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
Bokeh highlights
The silver one has the creamiest bokeh of them all
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BRunner
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 705
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2011 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BRunner wrote:
Nice comparison, thanks for sharing. My experiences are in line with your findings. My latest version with new barrel, but without MC has best color rendering and is as sharp as my silver version which has slightly better contrast WO, but strong green color cast. I tried about 5 other black versions, but all of them was worse than the two above mentioned. More dreamy WO and/or worse color rendering, than my latest black version.
_________________
.: APO-Maniac :. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
| BRunner wrote: |
| Nice comparison, thanks for sharing. My experiences are in line with your findings. My latest version with new barrel, but without MC has best color rendering and is as sharp as my silver version which has slightly better contrast WO, but strong green color cast. I tried about 5 other black versions, but all of them was worse than the two above mentioned. More dreamy WO and/or worse color rendering, than my latest black version. |
Ah yes, I spot the latest black J-9 without MC too, but at that time I thought that the MC is better so I skipped it . Thanks for adding the info about the latest non-MC black J-9.
My non-MC black J-9 is the older one.
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Tervueren
Joined: 18 May 2011
Posts: 1177
Location: West Sussex, United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-08
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Tervueren wrote:
Thanks, very interesting, especially atm as I look for one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
pst
Joined: 25 Aug 2010
Posts: 108
Location: Austria
Expire: 2013-08-17
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pst wrote:
Nice comparison!
But MY M42 silver J9 definetly is not as sharp as yours! It also has the "glow".
S/N 6401027 labeled in arabic letters.
_________________
Regards, Patrick. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6943
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 23, 2011 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I have owned 2 alu versions; I still have the 2nd. I would not call the J9 a sharp lens. It's quite good, but sharpness is not its strength.
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
@Tervueren: you're welcome.
@pst & martin: thanks for the info.
So now we can not generalize that the silver always sharper It depends on the copy, either the silver, the black and the black MC.
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kram
Joined: 06 Feb 2010
Posts: 1344
Location: Portland, OR
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Kram wrote:
nixland, thanks for the very interesting test.
Someone just loaned me a silver J9 to try with the option to buy if I like it. I must test it outdoors but I did test it indoors today and it seems to have some CA, especially wide open. Don't want to hijack the thread but I can post my simple test if you'd like to see it. It's M42 version.
Agree with Martin that sharpness is not it's strong suit. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jesito
Joined: 24 Aug 2007
Posts: 5745
Location: Olivella, Catalonia, (Spain)
Expire: 2015-01-07
|
| Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jesito wrote:
I've owned two black copies and one silver, and found the silver one much better than the others, not specially sharp wide open but very good at 5,6 upwards. Nice for portraits. I keep the silver copy only.
Regards,
Jes.
_________________
Jesito, Moderator 
Jesito's backsack:
Zooms Sigma 70-300, Tamron 35-135 and 70-210 short, 70-210 long, 28-70 CF Macro, 35-70, 35-80, Vivitar 70-210 KA, Tamron 70-250.
Fixed Industar-50, , Tamron 24mm, Tamron 135mm, Sands Hunter 135mm, Pancolar 50mm, Volna-3, many Exakta lenses
DSLR SIGMA SD9 & SD14, EOS 5D, Sony A700 and NEXF3, Oly E-330, E-400, E-450, E-1
TLR/6x6/645 YashicaMat, Petri 6x45, Nettar, Franka Solida, Brilliant
SLR Minolta X300, Fuji STX II, Praktica VLC3, Pentax P30t, EXA500, EXA 1A, Spotmatic(2), Chinon CM-4S, Ricoh, Contax, Konica TC-X , Minolta 5000, 7000i, 3Sxi, EOS 500 and CX
Rangefinders Chinon 35EE, Konica C35 auto, Canonet 28, Yashica Lynx, FED-2, Yashica electro 35, Argus C3 & C4, Regula Cita III, Voigtlander Vitoret (many), Welta Welti-I, Kodak Signette 35, Zorki-4, Bessa-R & L, Minolta Weathermatic, olympus XA2
Compact Film Konica C35V, Voigtlander Vitorets, Canon Prima Super 105, Olympus XA2 and XA3
Compact Digital Olympus C-5050, Aiptek Slim 3000, Canon Powershot A540, Nikon 5200, SIGMA DP1s, Polaroid X530, IXUS55, Kodak 6490, Powershot G9 and G10
CSCCanon EOS-M, Samsung NX100 and NX210, Lumix G5, NEX-F3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
| Kram wrote: |
nixland, thanks for the very interesting test.
Someone just loaned me a silver J9 to try with the option to buy if I like it. I must test it outdoors but I did test it indoors today and it seems to have some CA, especially wide open. Don't want to hijack the thread but I can post my simple test if you'd like to see it. It's M42 version.
Agree with Martin that sharpness is not it's strong suit. |
Kram, please do post the sample photos. It will be a good reference to us.
By the way I never spot any CA with my 3 Jupiter. Maybe it shows up in extreme condition.
| Jesito wrote: |
I've owned two black copies and one silver, and found the silver one much better than the others, not specially sharp wide open but very good at 5,6 upwards. Nice for portraits. I keep the silver copy only.
Regards,
Jes. |
Thanks for the info Jes.
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 1389
Location: Berlin, DE
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
It's interesting how different this "same" lens can be, isn't it?
My results are comparable to yours, with exceptions. I tested M39 alu, early M39 black, and a late (made in 2000) MC version. The black M39 version came out the sharpest.
The alu version had warm color cast, the black M39 lens is greenish, the MC version is slightly cool but true to original colors.
I found bokeh produced by the MC version the busiest when shot wide open. Strange but true! Alu and M39 black versions were the same.
Since that test, I also acquired a modern version of non-MC Jupiter-9. It's made in the 80's, still has old-style barrel with knurled focusing ring, and has slightly golden coating on all lens elements. This is probably the most common model around. Surprisingly, my sample was practically as sharp as the alu and M39 black versions, with none of the "glow" that is visible with the MC version.
The first image is a resize of the picture taken with the black M39 version of Jupiter-9. Next, there's a 100% crop from that lens followed by the 100% crop of the MC version. Note that, even as the two lenses are shot wide open, there's quite a lot of difference in rendering between the two. The MC lens looks like it has a smaller effective aperture - yet this is not the case! Shutter speed with the old lens was 1/1600, while the MC lens had 1/2000, meaning it transmits more light to the sensor for whatever reason.
Histograms: old lens / MC lens.
_________________
List of lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nixland
Joined: 30 Jan 2011
Posts: 577
Expire: 2012-07-29
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 3:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
nixland wrote:
@aoleg: Wow, thanks a lot for sharing your experience with the J-9.
More information is good for complete reference of this J-9 lens.
So each version can have a good and bad performance. I was lucky I had the sharp silver version
_________________
Carl Zeiss Jena: Biotar 58/2 1Q, DDR Pancolar 80/1.8 MC, Biotar 75/1.5, Biotar 10cm/2, DDR Sonnar 135/3.5 MC
Carl Zeiss C/Y: Planar 50/1.4 T*, Planar 85/1.4 T*, Planar 100/2 T*, Sonnar 135/2.8 T*
Leica: Summicron-R 35/2 v1, Summicron-R 50/2, Summilux-R 80/1.4, Summicron-R 90/2
Pentax: A 50/1.2
Minolta: Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Rokkor MC 85/1.7, Rokkor MC 100/2, MD 200/2.8
Olympus: Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2, Zuiko 50/1.2, Zuiko MC Auto-T 85/2, Zuiko Auto-T 100/2
Nikon: Nikkor 28/2.8 Ais, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikkor 105/1.8, 300/2.8 ED (Ais)
Canon: FD 50/1.2 L, FD 85/1.2 L
Sony: 135/2.8 STF
Jupiter: 85/2 Alu
Cyclop: 85/1.5
Meyer-Optic: Trioplan 100/2.8, Orestor 100/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5
Samyang: 8/3.5 FE, 14/2.8, 85/1.4, 85/1.4 UMC
FOR SALE
Carl Zeiss Jena Biotar 10cm/2 || Carl Zeiss ZE Distagon 28/2 || Minolta Rokkor MD 35/1.8 || Rokkor-X MC 85/1.7 || Rokkor MD 85/1.7 || Olympus Zuiko MC Auto-W 21/2 || Olympus 100/2 || Nikon Nikkor 35/1.4 || Canon: FD 55/1.2 || Vivitar 90/2.5 Series 1 VMC || Tamron: 90/2.5 SP
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
| martinsmith99 wrote: |
| I have owned 2 alu versions; I still have the 2nd. I would not call the J9 a sharp lens. It's quite good, but sharpness is not its strength. |
You just have not been lucky. My silver J9 is really sharp wide open. I bought it just for curiosity after I sold my MC ones.
I ended up keeping it because it's really good (and you know I have some good lenses).
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2011 8:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
| aoleg wrote: |
| It's interesting how different this "same" lens can be, isn't it? |
The fact is, it's not the same lens. The design changed with the MC version, which was made glowing wide open on purpose, because that's how most photographers wanted it for portraits.
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Posts: 1694
Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
i have a question about silver jupiter 9 in m39 mount? will i be able to reach infinity using it with m39-m42 adapter ring on dSLR? i have opportunity to acquire one locally
_________________
my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
There is a silver RF lens in my opinion best from all.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JohnBee
Joined: 11 Mar 2010
Posts: 179
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
JohnBee wrote:
| Attila wrote: |
| There is a silver RF lens in my opinion best from all. |
What does RF mean? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
WolverineX
Joined: 19 Apr 2009
Posts: 1694
Location: Zagreb , Croatia , Europe
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
WolverineX wrote:
| JohnBee wrote: |
| Attila wrote: |
| There is a silver RF lens in my opinion best from all. |
What does RF mean? |
RF is for rangefinder. Silver jupiter 9 in m39 mount was lens for russian rangefinder cameras like Zorki
_________________
my tools:Oly E-M5 + 45mm/1.8 + Oly E-520 + 12-60 + 14-42 + 70-300 + Sigma 105mm + FL-50R + EC20 + SRF-11 ring flash
http://forum.mflenses.com/wolverinex-testing-my-lenses-series-link-list-t39524.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
simbon4o
Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 390
Location: Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
simbon4o wrote:
you must search for the longer design lens(oldest ones)
They are closer to the original zeiss design!
Well it is a Russian production so there will be bad copies but as close you get to the original the better they are! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Smoli4
Joined: 01 Jul 2011
Posts: 606
Location: Haifa, Israel
Expire: 2013-06-07
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 9:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Smoli4 wrote:
Those longer jupiters are just the RF version. they wont work on a dslr |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
simbon4o
Joined: 19 Dec 2011
Posts: 390
Location: Bulgaria
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2012 9:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
simbon4o wrote:
| Smoli4 wrote: |
| Those longer jupiters are just the RF version. they wont work on a dslr |
That's not exactly true Helios 40(version 1 is M39 and works on dslr, and with a slight modification with infinity focus) and there are M42 versions of this lens with this design. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
