View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
womble
Joined: 28 Sep 2009 Posts: 987 Location: Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:57 pm Post subject: Central Park (SMC "K" 135mm f/2.5) |
|
|
womble wrote:
Some from Central Park. All shot with Kodak CN400BW film rated at 320 ASA, Pentax MX, Pentax K 135mm f/2.5 lens.
Other images available on flickr [link=http://www.flickr.com/photos/31364196@N04/sets/72157624178063817/]here.[/link]
Best wishes, Kris. _________________ Kris Lockyear
Digital: Pentax K-3iii
35mm film SLRs: various Pentax bodies from a H2 to a SF7, favourites the MX and LX
Rangefinder: Zeiss Super Ikonta IV, FED2, Zorkii-4, Industar 26m, Jupiter 8, 11 and 12 lenses
Medium format: various folders, Yashica Mat 124 G. Lubitel 2
LF: Horseman LE 5x4 view camera.
MF lenses (favourites) Pentax "K" 200mm f/2.5; "K" 135mm f/2.5; "K" 50mm f/1.2; "K" 35mm f/2; "K" 30mm f/2.8; "K" 28mm f/3.5 shift; "K" 15mm f/3.5; M 100mm f/2.8; M 40mm f/2.8; Jupiter-9 85mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Very nice set, like your results at 320 with this film. Especially like the comp
in the last. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
Excellent result
I especially love the first two, and you got a fine version of that last _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
paperinik
Joined: 11 Jan 2009 Posts: 100 Location: Adro, italy
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
paperinik wrote:
Cool photos.
The digital print is really well done also. I mean, they pop on my screen as few other BW. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fish4570
Joined: 06 Jan 2010 Posts: 4514 Location: At the confluence of the Locust Fork of the Warrior River and Black Creek, Alabama
Expire: 2012-03-21
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fish4570 wrote:
The top two are priceless. What a range of facial expressions ... _________________ Paul
I chase Light
http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
I really love the last one! _________________ Fujifilm X-Pro2 / Fujifilm X-T1 / some Sonnar & Takumar lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
Excellent. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
+1 impressive quality _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rbelyell
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
these are really nice shots; i am very much liking your b&w work!
i notice that many times you set the camera below the iso setting of the film: here you shot 400 film at 320. could you tell me why you do that and if, when you develop the film, you have to tell the developer that you shot it that way.
thanks
tony _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
rbelyell wrote: |
these are really nice shots; i am very much liking your b&w work!
i notice that many times you set the camera below the iso setting of the film: here you shot 400 film at 320. could you tell me why you do that and if, when you develop the film, you have to tell the developer that you shot it that way.
|
Negative film likes slight overexposure, far more than underexposure. So you can shoot at ASA320 without the need to pull during processing. _________________ Fujifilm X-Pro2 / Fujifilm X-T1 / some Sonnar & Takumar lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
The Kodak CN400BW (which is one of my fav films) shows increased contrast when slightly overexposed (at least to my experience).
These are great shots. Thanks for sharing. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rbelyell
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
the opinion is this film works best overexposed, but these images to me look a tad underexposed...am i crazy? _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski
Joined: 12 Jan 2009 Posts: 287 Location: Czech Republic
|
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 12:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski wrote:
second photo (the girl) is famous!
(nice contrast btw, i didnt know, that this C41 processed B&W film looks so great. time to buy roll or two... ) _________________ Rokkor (MD 45/2.0, MC PF 50/1.7), Porst Color Reflex MC Auto 55/1.2, Jupiter 135/3.5
Minolta X-700, Minolta Dynax 4, Flexaret IIa (later version), Flexaret VI
Voigtländer Avus 9x12 (1927-1935 version)
Epson V500 + VueScan/Linux + RawTherapee 4.x + GIMP/wavelett sharpen plugin
Meopta Magnifax III (up to 6x9) + Opemus III (up to 6x6), Rodenstock Rodagon 50/2.8, Meopta Anaret 105/4.5
Proud user of czech films! company homepage: foma.cz, buy here: fomafoto.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eeyore_nl
Joined: 09 Nov 2008 Posts: 837 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Aug 09, 2010 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eeyore_nl wrote:
rbelyell wrote: |
the opinion is this film works best overexposed, but these images to me look a tad underexposed...am i crazy? |
I would rather say they look like high contrast.
In my first reply, I overlooked that the film is Kodak BW400CN. While officially rated as an ASA 400 film, I prefer to use it as an ASA 200 film. At 400 or higher, the "grain" (actually dye clouds) get rather ugly.
Shot at ASA 200, it is a great film, in my opinion. _________________ Fujifilm X-Pro2 / Fujifilm X-T1 / some Sonnar & Takumar lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
womble
Joined: 28 Sep 2009 Posts: 987 Location: Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
womble wrote:
These chromogenic BW films have a very wide exposure latitude. Setting a high ISO (or under exposing them) gives contrasty and more grainy images, setting a low ISO (or over exposing them) gives finer grain but flatter contrast images. Of course, the contrast can be boosted either in software or by the choice of paper at the printing stage.
I admit I use this as my 'lazy man' film when I am forcing myself out of my comfort zone and trying to take quick 'street' shots. When I am taking photos I have time to meter properly and fuss over, I use Delta 100. It is also useful when using an older camera if you don't have 100% faith in the metering or the accuracy of the shutter speed. It is a very forgiving film. I am trying a roll of 120 through my Lubitel at the moment. I shot a roll of Velvia 50 through the Lubi (a very unforgiving film!) and they are all about a stop or a stop and a half under-exposed. They were all very carefully metered using my handheld meter too. They should scan OK though.
K. _________________ Kris Lockyear
Digital: Pentax K-3iii
35mm film SLRs: various Pentax bodies from a H2 to a SF7, favourites the MX and LX
Rangefinder: Zeiss Super Ikonta IV, FED2, Zorkii-4, Industar 26m, Jupiter 8, 11 and 12 lenses
Medium format: various folders, Yashica Mat 124 G. Lubitel 2
LF: Horseman LE 5x4 view camera.
MF lenses (favourites) Pentax "K" 200mm f/2.5; "K" 135mm f/2.5; "K" 50mm f/1.2; "K" 35mm f/2; "K" 30mm f/2.8; "K" 28mm f/3.5 shift; "K" 15mm f/3.5; M 100mm f/2.8; M 40mm f/2.8; Jupiter-9 85mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
#1 for me, excellent! _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
womble
Joined: 28 Sep 2009 Posts: 987 Location: Hertfordshire
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
womble wrote:
Orio wrote: |
#1 for me, excellent! |
That is my favourite too. Perversely, the Pentax Photo Gallery accepted the other three but not that one!
Best wishes, Kris. _________________ Kris Lockyear
Digital: Pentax K-3iii
35mm film SLRs: various Pentax bodies from a H2 to a SF7, favourites the MX and LX
Rangefinder: Zeiss Super Ikonta IV, FED2, Zorkii-4, Industar 26m, Jupiter 8, 11 and 12 lenses
Medium format: various folders, Yashica Mat 124 G. Lubitel 2
LF: Horseman LE 5x4 view camera.
MF lenses (favourites) Pentax "K" 200mm f/2.5; "K" 135mm f/2.5; "K" 50mm f/1.2; "K" 35mm f/2; "K" 30mm f/2.8; "K" 28mm f/3.5 shift; "K" 15mm f/3.5; M 100mm f/2.8; M 40mm f/2.8; Jupiter-9 85mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Michael Markey
Joined: 17 Sep 2010 Posts: 20 Location: UK
|
Posted: Tue Sep 28, 2010 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Michael Markey wrote:
I do like those Kris.
Must try 320 the next time that I use 400cn. I mostley use XP2 or APXS.
I have started to set for overexposure with Superia XTRA and it gives much better results.
That`s a nice lens too.
I`ve been debating whether to get a 135 for my Pentax ME.
Looks like you`ve decided it for me
Michael |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DiegoV
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 91 Location: Mira, Portugal
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 3:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DiegoV wrote:
#2 for me. All of them are good, though. Nice series. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|