Home
SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

...and now some from today
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:31 am    Post subject: ...and now some from today Reply with quote

Shoot in the castle of Vigoleno last Autumn, on B&W film with Contax G2 rangefinder and Sonnar 2.8/90 lens:


























Direct links:
http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/179/vig0601hx5.jpg
http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/9631/vig0602pk3.jpg
http://img225.imageshack.us/img225/6393/vig0603it2.jpg
http://img405.imageshack.us/img405/9624/vig0604xh0.jpg
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/5208/vig0605vh6.jpg
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1322/vig0606sh9.jpg
http://img89.imageshack.us/img89/1847/vig0607iq7.jpg
http://img214.imageshack.us/img214/3751/vig0608ic5.jpg


PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 2:57 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like this series! Did you use your Epson 4490 for these? The fountain
shot is superb! Even though these are digitally scanned they seem...more
organic to me, for want of a better expression.


PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 3:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

katastrofo wrote:
I like this series! Did you use your Epson 4490 for these? The fountain
shot is superb! Even though these are digitally scanned they seem...more
organic to me, for want of a better expression.


Yes, I scanned with the 4490. I am trying to improve my scanning technique. Still looking for good tips though.
The "organicity" (on which I completely agree upon) is due to a series of factors: the use of film, having scanned from a print (instead of from a negative), but most of all, the use of Carl Zeiss lenses. As you can see also in the Distagon 35mm images, and even if shot with a digital camera, the "organicity" is always there. And you don't have to rob a bank. I paid my 35mm Distagon 135Eur.