View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2698 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
Thanks Jes, I haven't seen that link before but I'm glad I have now. Thank you. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnBar
Joined: 21 Jun 2012 Posts: 581 Location: Liverpool
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JohnBar wrote:
Here's my method
1 remove element
2 with little finger gently rub a blob of PC into lens until PC gets almost transparent
3 leave overnight
4 remove PC with chamois leather dampened with lighter fluid
5 dry off with fresh dry chamois leather, no fibres to stick to lens!!
I would advise caution rinsing with warm water, it can react with coating to form haze.
get chamois from Poundland, 16 squares sewn together for £1, unpick the stitches and you get 16x lens cleaning cloths _________________ Rectilux 3FF Series single focus anamorphic attachments
http://www.transferconvert.co.uk/cinemania/rectilux-3ff.html
Regular News on https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rectilux/704770636267200 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SonicScot
Joined: 01 Dec 2011 Posts: 2698 Location: Scottish Highlands
|
Posted: Fri Aug 31, 2012 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SonicScot wrote:
Gonna practice these methods next time I spot some fungus. _________________ Gary
Currently active gear....
Sony a7
E-M1 Mkll
Rubinar 1000/10 + 2x matched extender
Tamron 500/8 55BB
Sigma 100-300/4
Vivitar Series 1.... 200/3, 70-210/3.5 (V1 by Kiron), 135/2.3, 105/2.5 macro, 90/2.5 macro (Bokina), 90-180/4.5 Flat Field Macro, 28-90mm f/2.8-3.5
Carl Zeiss.... 180/2.8, 135/3.5, 85/1.4, 35/2.4 Flektagon, 21/2.8 Distagon
Nikon.... 55/3.5 micro, 50/1.2
Elicar 90/2.5 V-HQ Macro
Zhongyi Speedmaster 85/1.2
Jupiter-9 85/2
Helios.... 58/2 44-3
Hartblei 45/3.5 Super-Rotator TS-PC
Zenitar 16/2.8 fisheye
Samyang 8/3.5 fisheye
Nodal Ninja 4, Neewer leveling tripod base
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/gazsus/ Website http://garianphotography.co.uk/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
s58y
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 Posts: 131 Location: Eastern NY
Expire: 2013-09-10
|
Posted: Sat Sep 01, 2012 12:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
s58y wrote:
This lens might be a bargain at 43 Euros. If you set out looking for a lens with a spectacular fungus infection, how long would it take and how much would you have to pay for a lens like this? This one just fell right into your lap with almost no effort _________________
flickr photostream
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
In the meanwhile I send it back (about a week ago). The seller asked for my bank account data but I didn't get any refunds yet!
Aaand now the icing on the cake: The seller is selling the same lens again. Still "without fungus"!!!!
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=160882421332
So s58y, there's your chance
PS: I made another pic of the fungus and posted it in the gallery:
http://forum.mflenses.com/fungus-in-lens-apo-rodagon-r-75-4-on-bellows-t52772,highlight,%2Bfungus.html _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
s58y
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 Posts: 131 Location: Eastern NY
Expire: 2013-09-10
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
s58y wrote:
ForenSeil wrote: |
...
So s58y, there's your chance
...
|
I guess I'll have to pass this time -- I never buy anything from non-US ebay sites, and even on US ebay I never import anything remotely expensive into the US. Besides, my knowledge of German is embrarassingly poor, and for all I know. "ohne ... fungus ..." means "textbook fungus". _________________
flickr photostream
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
s58y wrote: |
ForenSeil wrote: |
...
So s58y, there's your chance
...
|
I guess I'll have to pass this time -- I never buy anything from non-US ebay sites, and even on US ebay I never import anything remotely expensive into the US. Besides, my knowledge of German is embrarassingly poor, and for all I know. "ohne ... fungus ..." means "textbook fungus". |
Hmmm Well I'm somewhat closer to western NY than eastern. Out nearer the Niagara frontier, "ohne" is German for "without".
I'm with you though, up to a point, on the matter of purchase outreach. I pretty much limit myself to North America ex Mexico.
I'm attracted to the Canadian lenses because Canada is a wonderfully chilly country and therefore, one hopes, less friendly to fungus growth. I always have concern about the FL and LA glass, for example. It's like a year-round fungus incubator down there!! That's simply not a problem or concern in, for example, Manitoba. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 2877
|
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 9:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
LA is a former desert. It's lowest humidity climate imaginable. _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
s58y
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 Posts: 131 Location: Eastern NY
Expire: 2013-09-10
|
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
s58y wrote:
fermy wrote: |
LA is a former desert. It's lowest humidity climate imaginable. |
I assume that's Louisiana, not Los Angeles. _________________
flickr photostream
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jeff Zen
Joined: 17 Jun 2009 Posts: 262 Location: Northwest USA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 21, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jeff Zen wrote:
Wow, I've purchased lenses advertised as clean that had fungus before, but nothing as obvious or defined as yours. This has to be a new record! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
s58y wrote: |
fermy wrote: |
LA is a former desert. It's lowest humidity climate imaginable. |
I assume that's Louisiana, not Los Angeles. |
My sister lives in Pasadena, CA. To her, also, LA would mean Los Angeles . . . even within the context of my earlier post and being used alongside FL, for Florida, and my reference to fungus. Anything east of the San Gabriel Mountains lies outside my sister's frame of reference. The Pacific Ocean defines the western border of that same frame.
So even though I laughed my butt off I understand that for some folks, regardless any and all evidence to the contrary, "LA" means Los Angeles.
But for the record, yes of course you are correct that when I typed "LA" I was using the USPS designation for Louisiana, just as my use of "FL" reflected the USPS designation for Florida. Both of those states strike me as fungus havens when compared with, for example, Manitoba's much colder climate. It's again only just MHO, but to me Canadian lenses in general are interesting and attractive for that reason, other things being equal. When I come across a southern lens being offered for sale, it does give pause . . . . especially if it's an oldie that appears to have been stored in a leather lens case, aka, fungal incubator!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fermy
Joined: 17 Feb 2012 Posts: 2877
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
fermy wrote:
Having lived for 5 years in Pasadena, CA, I am just like your sister _________________ Many lenses and some film bodies for sale here: http://forum.mflenses.com/canon-fd-minolta-md-c-mounts-m42-pentax-and-more-t50465.html
Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/96060788@N06/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
s58y
Joined: 05 Sep 2010 Posts: 131 Location: Eastern NY
Expire: 2013-09-10
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
s58y wrote:
I'll have to admit that when I saw "LA", I first thought of "Los Angeles" (but not for long).
For the record, I used to live in CA until 1956, and spent months in the L.A. area from 1955-1957. I've never even been to LA (or TX, OK, AR, MS, AL, AK, and HI). _________________
flickr photostream
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
maxcastle
Joined: 14 Apr 2012 Posts: 492
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 9:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
maxcastle wrote:
fermy wrote: |
Having lived for 5 years in Pasadena, CA, I am just like your sister |
steady on _________________ my humble blog is
http://rolotomassi.blog.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Farside
Joined: 01 Sep 2007 Posts: 6549 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2013-12-27
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 12:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Farside wrote:
maxcastle wrote: |
fermy wrote: |
Having lived for 5 years in Pasadena, CA, I am just like your sister |
steady on |
Quite.
Mind you, perhaps the bracing ocean air has something to do with it. _________________ Dave - Moderator
Camera Fiend and Biograph Operator
If I wanted soot and whitewash I'd be a chimney sweep and house painter.
The Lenses of Farside (click)
BUY FRESH FOMAPAN TO HELP KEEP THE FACTORY ALIVE ---
Foma Campaign topic -
http://forum.mflenses.com/foma-campaign-t55443.html
FOMAPAN on forum -
http://www.mflenses.com/fs.php?sw=Fomapan
Webshop EU
http://www.fomafoto.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
At the risk of ending too abruptly this thread's excursion into geographic orgasmia, I'd like to return (at least temporarily) to the OP's original, though perhaps less titillating, topic: fungus in lenses.
I am curious to know the opinions of other posters regarding the contribution, if any, to fungal enhancement of lens storage within leather cases. Goodness knows, after a period of time, the cases themselves smell like fungal factories. It is easy, perhaps too easy, to jump to conclusions based alone upon that odor.
But manual focus lenses, speaking in general, oftentimes are older. And years ago leather lens cases were ubiquitous. So what are we fungus-phobes to do with those old cases? Do we cast them unceremoniously into the trash? Is there, instead, a way to rehabilitate those old lens cases, a way to kill whatever fungus they might harbor, a process which will make them safe?
If it's not already clear, I rather fancy the old leather lens cases. They were at one time, perhaps at moment of original sale, part of our lenses, at least in a manner of speaking. They were part of the original "package". I think they are quite neat. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011 Posts: 2726 Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Leather, cloth, cushion etc. are not easy to clean well enough to kill the fungus, so you can forget decontaminating lens cases unless you're throwing them into a jar with holes in top into a pressure cooker for 30min etc.. That might of course destroy some cases.
(Pressure cookers a somewhat more effective and if you do it correctly less harmful for the cases than a oven)
You can put a air dehumidifier into your cabinet to prevent any fungus groth. But that won't kill any fungus.
I never store lenses in old lens cases until I'm selling them. My lenses are living in cabinet and the old lens cases in a box.
Not only because of fungus/risk of infection and smell but because I also simply don't like to use them.
Anyway I won't care much about lens cases. Lens cases can be easily replaced and very most people don't care much about if it's original or not. _________________ I'm not a collector, I'm a tester
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 4:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I'm wondering about using a UV lamp to kill fungus. UV is used to kill bacteria in water treatment, and although fungus is different, I wonder if it wouldn't like UV. Even the cases interior could be treated. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
I'm wondering about using a UV lamp to kill fungus. UV is used to kill bacteria in water treatment, and although fungus is different, I wonder if it wouldn't like UV. Even the cases interior could be treated. |
It's my opinion exposure to ultraviolet is a splendid potential remedy.
It's important never to look at a UV light, though . . one powerful enough to kill fungus, I mean. It can damage human eyes.
As an extension of the ultraviolet idea, I think exposure of the leather cases to high energy radiation might also work. I'm thinking of the kind of devices used to irradiate food in order to kill pathogens.
I have an old Kodak Aero Ektar 24" (610mm) f/6.0 telephoto lens that might work. The gamma rays emitted by the large thorium rear element of that lens should kill off some fungus. I knew if I waited long enough I'd find a use for this lens.
I wonder if there exist services for this purpose. You would send in your leather cases, they would irradiate them and return them sans fungus, then you store the cases in a manner which excludes moisture . . . . like you should have done in the first place!
If I started such a business I would name it: "Second Chance Irradiation"
Last edited by guardian on Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:33 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57850 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Good solution is only story it properly, even if cleaned, killed etc fungus will come back in humid , dark environment. Proper storage stop growing all cleaning risk lens safety and coating. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
guardian
Joined: 18 Mar 2009 Posts: 1749
|
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
guardian wrote:
Attila wrote: |
Good solution is only story it properly, even if cleaned, killed etc fungus will come back in humid , dark environment. Proper storage stop growing all cleaning risk lens safety and coating. |
Agreed good comment. No question proper follow-on care is pivotal. Otherwise fungus returns.
Most of my leather was not cared for properly early on. But if I could just kill the fungus one time, then going forward I would be much more careful. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|