Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Zett P-Color 2.5/90 SMC, wow projector lenses continued
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 2:23 am    Post subject: Zett P-Color 2.5/90 SMC, wow projector lenses continued Reply with quote

The lens has a very good reputation, some put it in the same league with Leitz Super-Colorplan P2. I have some other projection lenses to compare with. It is true that sharpness and detail rendered by Zett lens are amazing. CA (purlple fringing) is also quite present, especially in contrast light conditions.

A speculation says this lens might be a rebranded Carl Zeiss P-Sonnar 2.5/90. If someone used the latter, it would be curious to clear out the similarities and differences.

Here are some test shots from Zett put on Sony Nex and custom adapter.

#1


#2


#3 A sunset test


#4 The same scene some time later, in a dimmer light


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 9:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is this same lens as Zett super talon 90mm 2.5 smc?


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 10:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You have some full size images?


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 11:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks good indeed!


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 2:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Here is a SOOC original. I manage to upload only one.



There is a bold speculation on origins and similarities of this lens to some others, including Zeiss, Leitz and ISCO. The hypothesis concerning Super Talon might be considered among others. Although their barrels are different.

Here are some links which provide speculation with some more or less hard facts. They are partly in German, easily translatable:

https://www.photoscala.de/2009/12/18/pradovit-diaprojektoren/
https://yashica.boards.net/thread/990/zeiss-zett
https://www.fotocommunity.de/forum/analoge-fotografie/zett-objektive---35730
https://www.digicamclub.de/showthread.php?t=20790


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 2:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote



PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 3:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I had thought it was widely accepted that Zett was another name for Zeiss projector lenses... but I've never looked into it. Mark mentions it here:
https://deltalenses.com/whats-in-a-name/
So I would guess he knows more about it.

I've never seen a Zett P-Color, but it does indeed look like the P-Sonnar 90 mm f/2.5 in terms of quality and rendering, which also suffers from the same purple/blueish CAs. Mark has tested it, and it did okay, but wasn't outstanding in terms of sharpness:
https://deltalenses.com/projector-lens-group-test-1-fast-90s/

I also think it does provide nice results with appropriate lighting, but does have problems with CAs in challenging situations (like the highway image you showed with the lights). I still think it's a capable lens overall, even though I personally prefer the Braun Ultralit-PL 90 mm f/2.4 overall. The P-Planar I have is in a pretty bad condition unfortunately, so I don't know how that one compares.

Here's a shot with the P-Sonnar:

#1


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 3:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice, I think this lens shines particularly as a bokeh lens. CA is quite obvious, but I could work around that (or in PP).


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 4:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you, simple.joy, for the useful info completing the question!

I find the Zett very sharp, at least my copy looks a bit better in this respect than P-Planar and P-Sonnar samples do. But testing in better light should be beneficial to conclusions. CA is very strong indeed.

From what I read in various discussions and publications, Zett might be Zeiss Ikon, located in Braunschweig and swallen by Voigtlander, and not the Zeiss Oberkochen.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 5:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

alex ph wrote:
Here is a SOOC original. I manage to upload only one.



There is a bold speculation on origins and similarities of this lens to some others, including Zeiss, Leitz and ISCO. The hypothesis concerning Super Talon might be considered among others. Although their barrels are different.

Here are some links which provide speculation with some more or less hard facts. They are partly in German, easily translatable:

https://www.photoscala.de/2009/12/18/pradovit-diaprojektoren/
https://yashica.boards.net/thread/990/zeiss-zett
https://www.fotocommunity.de/forum/analoge-fotografie/zett-objektive---35730
https://www.digicamclub.de/showthread.php?t=20790


interesting result, right side lot more sharper than the left one, can be the adapter issue?


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 5:08 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Summary of some information from photoscala.de and other German sources:

Zett was founded in 1928 by Erich Zillmer in Braunschweig (Brunswick) in northeastern Germany. In 1956 (or maybe 1964, depending on the source you believe) he sold it to Voigtländer which sold it in 1969 to Zeiss Ikon. During these times up to 100'000 projectors per year were produced. 1972 when Zeiss Ikon went bankrupt the Brunswick optical workshops went to Rollei, but the projetor stuff remained at Zeiss Ikon.

In the 1980s the former Zett workshops were producing not only Zeiss projectors, but also the expensive Leica Pradovit 150 and 250 series as well as the Hasselbald projectors. Carl Zeiss sold the Zeiss Ikon (including the former Zett) to the finnish Wärtsilä group in 1989. They sold the Zett (projectors) to Leica (now "Leica Projektion GmbH "), and Leica focused on producing only their own P150/155/255 series. Interestingly, from 1996 on they went back to the old Zeiss constructions, selling them as Leica P600.

In 2004 the name changed again, to "Zett Optics", and the company was sold to Allegra Capital. They sold it to Ventizz Capital Fund IV, L.P., and the lights finally went off in 2015 when the last 25 workers lost their jobs.

https://www.photoscala.de/2009/12/18/pradovit-diaprojektoren/

S


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 5:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kiddo wrote:
interesting result, right side lot more sharper than the left one, can be the adapter issue?


It certainly may. I inserted the lens staight into the adapter, aligned it to my sight, but did not have a rubber sponge to assure its tight location.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 5:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

stevemark wrote:
Summary of some information from photoscala.de and other German sources


Thank you, Stephan, for summing up the info in German!

Re-reading it, I note that Zeiss Ikon and Zeiss Oberkochen might be the same enterprise, which I thought was not.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 6:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

alex ph wrote:
kiddo wrote:
interesting result, right side lot more sharper than the left one, can be the adapter issue?


It certainly may. I inserted the lens staight into the adapter, aligned it to my sight, but did not have a rubber sponge to assure its tight location.


probably, if fit into a proper adapter, this lens would be sharp all over the image , if it´s not adapter issue, maybe an element it´s not correctly inserted
what is the outside diameter of the rear part of the lens?


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 6:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I will check it later with a better fit, when back to my "secondary" equipment and paraphernalia.

I don't have a caliper with me, but it looks like the standard 42.5mm.


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

alex ph wrote:
stevemark wrote:
Summary of some information from photoscala.de and other German sources


Thank you, Stephan, for summing up the info in German!

Re-reading it, I note that Zeiss Ikon and Zeiss Oberkochen might be the same enterprise, which I thought was not.


There's the BIG pre-WWII "Zeiss Ikon AG Dresden" (not the same as Carl Zeiss Jena of course, but Carl Zeiss Jena was main shareholder, and CZJ was 100% daughter of the Zeiss Foundation).

Immediately after the war, still 1945, the Carl Zeiss Foundation was moved to Heidenheim in (now) Western Gernamy, followed in 1946 by the foundation of "Opton Optische Werke" in Oberkochen (later "Zeiss Oberkochen") for reserach and lens production.

Later on, after WWII, the Dresden camera factories were completely dismantled by the Soviets, and partly transferred to Ukraine ("Kiev" cameras). Zeiss Ikon was re-established 1948 in Stuttart (Western Germany) for the production of cine and still cameras.

In 1956 the Zeiss Foundation (not Carl Zeiss Oberkochen, and not Zeiss Ikon Stuttgart) bought Voigtländer, but Voigtländer remained independent from Zeiss Ikon.

After 1965 cooperation between Voigtländer and Zeiss Ikon was established; later they were unified as "Zeiss Ikon-Voigtländer Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH". This company (and NOT Zeiss Oberkochen) went bankrupt in 1972. Several shareholders, among the Zeiss Oberkochen, Rollei and a state bank of Niedersachsen, re-established "Optische Werke Voigtländer GmbH, Braunschweig". That one lasted until 1974 (including a short term cooperation with Asahi resulting in the 2/28mm and 3.5/15mmm lenses) and then was dissolved.

Carl Zeiss and Yashica (Kyocera) started the Contax RTS line in 1974 which lasted until 2005 when finally Cosina entered the game.


Sources:
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeiss_Ikon
https://www.zeiss.de/consumer-products/home/content/newsroom/articles/cameras-from-zeiss.html

NOTE THAT THESE SOURCES TO SOME EXTENT ARE CONTRATDICTIONARY!


PostPosted: Sun Jan 14, 2024 6:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow, thank you! The story is even more complex than I thought it to be, with two homonyme Zeiss and the split between the Western and Eastern CZJ after the WWII.